Factors Influencing Prolonged Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay after Craniotomy for Intracranial Tumor in Children: A 10-year Analysis from a University Hospital.
Brain tumor
Craniotomy
Length of stay
Pediatric intensive care unit
Postoperative complications
Journal
Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine
ISSN: 0972-5229
Titre abrégé: Indian J Crit Care Med
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101208863
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2023
Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
31
01
2023
accepted:
04
02
2023
entrez:
24
3
2023
pubmed:
25
3
2023
medline:
25
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admission is routinely practiced in pediatric and adult craniotomy. This study aims to identify the factors associated with an ICU stay of more than one day (prolonged ICU stay, PIS) after pediatric brain tumor surgery. Medical records of children who underwent craniotomy for brain tumor during a 10-year period were reviewed and analyzed. Perioperative variables were examined and compared between the one-day ICU stay (ODIS) and PIS groups. A total of 314 craniotomies performed on 302 patients was included. Patients requiring postoperative ICU care for more than a day represented 37.9% of the sample. Significant factors found in the multivariate analysis affecting prolonged ICU length of stay included operative time ≥360 minutes (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.438; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.223-4.861; While most children undergoing a craniotomy for brain tumor need a postoperative ICU care of ≤1 day, slightly more than a one-third in our study stayed longer. The prediction of a PIS can be beneficial for optimal resource utilization, increasing ICU bed turnover rate, reduction of operation cancellation, and improved preparation for parent expectations. Sangtongjaraskul S, Lerdsirisopon S, Sae-phua V, Kanta S, Kongkiattikul L. Factors Influencing Prolonged Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay after Craniotomy for Intracranial Tumor in Children: A 10-year Analysis from a University Hospital. Indian J Crit Care Med 2023;27(3):205-211.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) admission is routinely practiced in pediatric and adult craniotomy. This study aims to identify the factors associated with an ICU stay of more than one day (prolonged ICU stay, PIS) after pediatric brain tumor surgery.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Medical records of children who underwent craniotomy for brain tumor during a 10-year period were reviewed and analyzed. Perioperative variables were examined and compared between the one-day ICU stay (ODIS) and PIS groups.
Results
UNASSIGNED
A total of 314 craniotomies performed on 302 patients was included. Patients requiring postoperative ICU care for more than a day represented 37.9% of the sample. Significant factors found in the multivariate analysis affecting prolonged ICU length of stay included operative time ≥360 minutes (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.438; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.223-4.861;
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
While most children undergoing a craniotomy for brain tumor need a postoperative ICU care of ≤1 day, slightly more than a one-third in our study stayed longer. The prediction of a PIS can be beneficial for optimal resource utilization, increasing ICU bed turnover rate, reduction of operation cancellation, and improved preparation for parent expectations.
How to cite this article
UNASSIGNED
Sangtongjaraskul S, Lerdsirisopon S, Sae-phua V, Kanta S, Kongkiattikul L. Factors Influencing Prolonged Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay after Craniotomy for Intracranial Tumor in Children: A 10-year Analysis from a University Hospital. Indian J Crit Care Med 2023;27(3):205-211.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36960121
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24418
pmc: PMC10028711
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
205-211Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023; The Author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: None
Références
Front Neurol. 2019 Nov 28;10:1243
pubmed: 31849815
Crit Care Med. 2003 Dec;31(12):2782-7
pubmed: 14668615
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2019 Apr 19;24(1):29-34
pubmed: 31003227
Neurocrit Care. 2009;10(1):4-10
pubmed: 18256793
World Neurosurg. 2014 Jan;81(1):165-72
pubmed: 23182731
Pediatr Neurosurg. 2011;47(6):423-9
pubmed: 22776999
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2011 Jan;23(1):25-9
pubmed: 21252705
Surg Neurol Int. 2015 May 25;6(Suppl 6):S271-4
pubmed: 26069848
J Neurosurg. 2008 Aug;109(2):222-7
pubmed: 18671633
Neurosurgery. 2012 Apr;70(4):936-43; discussion 943
pubmed: 21993188
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016 Sep;18(3):363-71
pubmed: 27231823
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010 Nov;11(6):718-22
pubmed: 20308930
Neurol India. 2022 May-Jun;70(3):1095-1101
pubmed: 35864645
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016 May;17(5):564-8
pubmed: 26722960
Axone. 1995 Dec;17(2):42-5
pubmed: 8695536
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021 May;30(5):813-821
pubmed: 33653816
J Neurosurg. 2011 Dec;115(6):1236-41
pubmed: 21888476