Challenges and opportunities in remote sensing-based crop monitoring: a review.
Ground data
Remote Sensing
crop condition
crop monitoring
crop production
Journal
National science review
ISSN: 2053-714X
Titre abrégé: Natl Sci Rev
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101633095
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2023
Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
02
08
2022
revised:
12
12
2022
accepted:
15
12
2022
entrez:
24
3
2023
pubmed:
25
3
2023
medline:
25
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Building a more resilient food system for sustainable development and reducing uncertainty in global food markets both require concurrent and near-real-time and reliable crop information for decision making. Satellite-driven crop monitoring has become a main method to derive crop information at local, regional, and global scales by revealing the spatial and temporal dimensions of crop growth status and production. However, there is a lack of quantitative, objective, and robust methods to ensure the reliability of crop information, which reduces the applicability of crop monitoring and leads to uncertain and undesirable consequences. In this paper, we review recent progress in crop monitoring and identify the challenges and opportunities in future efforts. We find that satellite-derived metrics do not fully capture determinants of crop production and do not quantitatively interpret crop growth status; the latter can be advanced by integrating effective satellite-derived metrics and new onboard sensors. We have identified that ground data accessibility and the negative effects of knowledge-based analyses are two essential issues in crop monitoring that reduce the applicability of crop monitoring for decisions on food security. Crowdsourcing is one solution to overcome the restrictions of ground-truth data accessibility. We argue that user participation in the complete process of crop monitoring could improve the reliability of crop information. Encouraging users to obtain crop information from multiple sources could prevent unconscious biases. Finally, there is a need to avoid conflicts of interest in publishing publicly available crop information.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36960224
doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwac290
pii: nwac290
pmc: PMC10029851
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
nwac290Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of China Science Publishing & Media Ltd.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None declared.
Références
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Feb 07;21(4):
pubmed: 33562266
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 15;110(3):E185-92
pubmed: 23213258
Trends Plant Sci. 2019 Feb;24(2):152-164
pubmed: 30558964
Nat Commun. 2018 Apr 24;9(1):1627
pubmed: 29691405
Science. 2020 Apr 17;368(6488):266-269
pubmed: 32299946
Science. 1980 May 16;208(4445):670-9
pubmed: 17771086
Remote Sens Environ. 2020 Jun;242:111758
pubmed: 36082364
Agric Syst. 2017 Jul;155:269-288
pubmed: 28701818
Remote Sens Environ. 2019 Sep 15;231:
pubmed: 33414568
Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7819):37-40
pubmed: 32760042
Agric Syst. 2019 Jan;168:247-257
pubmed: 30774185