Low-Cost Technology-Aided Programs for Supporting People With Motor, Visual, and Intellectual Disabilities in Functional Forms of Occupation and Communication: Proof-of-Concept Study.
communication
intellectual disability
leisure
motor impairment
smartphone
stories
tablet
technology
visual impairment
Journal
JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies
ISSN: 2369-2529
Titre abrégé: JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101703412
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Mar 2023
24 Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
11
11
2022
accepted:
28
02
2023
revised:
16
01
2023
entrez:
24
3
2023
pubmed:
25
3
2023
medline:
25
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
People with motor, visual, and intellectual disabilities may have serious problems in independently accessing various forms of functional daily occupation and communication. The study was aimed at developing and assessing new, low-cost technology-aided programs to help people with motor or visual-motor and intellectual disabilities independently engage in functional forms of occupation and communication with distant partners. Two programs were set up using a smartphone interfaced with a 2-switch device and a tablet interfaced with 2 pressure sensors, respectively. Single-subject research designs were used to assess (1) the first program with 2 participants who were blind, had moderate hand control, and were interested in communicating with distant partners through voice messages; and (2) the second program with 2 participants who possessed functional vision, had no or poor hand control, and were interested in communicating with their partners through video calls. Both programs also supported 2 forms of occupational engagement, that is, choosing and accessing preferred leisure events consisting of songs and music videos, and listening to brief stories about relevant daily topics and answering questions related to those stories. During the baseline phase (when only a conventional smartphone or tablet was available), 2 participants managed sporadic access to leisure or leisure and communication events. The other 2 participants did not show any independent leisure or communication engagement. During the intervention (when the technology-aided programs were used), all participants managed to independently engage in multiple leisure and communication events throughout the sessions and to listen to stories and answer story-related questions. The findings, which need to be interpreted with caution given the nature of the study and the small number of participants, seem to suggest that the new programs may be viable tools for helping people with motor or visual-motor and intellectual disabilities independently access leisure, communication, and other forms of functional engagement.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
People with motor, visual, and intellectual disabilities may have serious problems in independently accessing various forms of functional daily occupation and communication.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The study was aimed at developing and assessing new, low-cost technology-aided programs to help people with motor or visual-motor and intellectual disabilities independently engage in functional forms of occupation and communication with distant partners.
METHODS
METHODS
Two programs were set up using a smartphone interfaced with a 2-switch device and a tablet interfaced with 2 pressure sensors, respectively. Single-subject research designs were used to assess (1) the first program with 2 participants who were blind, had moderate hand control, and were interested in communicating with distant partners through voice messages; and (2) the second program with 2 participants who possessed functional vision, had no or poor hand control, and were interested in communicating with their partners through video calls. Both programs also supported 2 forms of occupational engagement, that is, choosing and accessing preferred leisure events consisting of songs and music videos, and listening to brief stories about relevant daily topics and answering questions related to those stories.
RESULTS
RESULTS
During the baseline phase (when only a conventional smartphone or tablet was available), 2 participants managed sporadic access to leisure or leisure and communication events. The other 2 participants did not show any independent leisure or communication engagement. During the intervention (when the technology-aided programs were used), all participants managed to independently engage in multiple leisure and communication events throughout the sessions and to listen to stories and answer story-related questions.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The findings, which need to be interpreted with caution given the nature of the study and the small number of participants, seem to suggest that the new programs may be viable tools for helping people with motor or visual-motor and intellectual disabilities independently access leisure, communication, and other forms of functional engagement.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36961483
pii: v10i1e44239
doi: 10.2196/44239
pmc: PMC10131918
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e44239Informations de copyright
©Giulio E Lancioni, Nirbhay N Singh, Mark F O’Reilly, Jeff Sigafoos, Gloria Alberti, Valeria Chiariello, Lorenzo Desideri, Serafino Buono. Originally published in JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technology (https://rehab.jmir.org), 24.03.2023.
Références
Int J Dev Disabil. 2018 Nov 18;66(3):180-189
pubmed: 34141380
J Appl Behav Anal. 2017 Apr;50(2):345-356
pubmed: 28128442
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 16;18(6):
pubmed: 33809518
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022 Nov;17(8):957-964
pubmed: 33078974
Augment Altern Commun. 2019 Mar;35(1):26-41
pubmed: 30648902
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2018 Jan;31(1):114-119
pubmed: 28544583
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2018 Oct;62(10):900-921
pubmed: 29992653
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017 Apr;12(3):236-243
pubmed: 26730647
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Dec;34(12):4328-33
pubmed: 24139710
Augment Altern Commun. 2015;31(3):246-58
pubmed: 25791421
Assist Technol. 2018;30(4):201-208
pubmed: 28471273
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016 Nov;11(8):630-5
pubmed: 25585813
Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Jan-Feb;32(1):222-34
pubmed: 21041062
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019 Nov;14(8):753-754
pubmed: 31469019
J Intellect Disabil. 2020 Sep;24(3):289-308
pubmed: 30010467
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2014;24(3-4):332-48
pubmed: 24286346
Augment Altern Commun. 2019 Mar;35(1):13-25
pubmed: 30663899
Behav Modif. 2011 Jul;35(4):303-22
pubmed: 21411481
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2013 Apr;57(4):319-32
pubmed: 22404152
Autism Res. 2021 Sep;14(9):1948-1964
pubmed: 34101373
Int J Dev Disabil. 2021 Jan 8;68(5):781-783
pubmed: 36210905
Dev Neurorehabil. 2022 Apr;25(3):193-204
pubmed: 34895026
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021 Apr;16(3):340-349
pubmed: 31686569
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017 May;12(4):341-351
pubmed: 27293107
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018 Jul;13(5):437-444
pubmed: 29772940
Perspect Behav Sci. 2018 May 17;42(1):153-162
pubmed: 31976426
Behav Anal Pract. 2012 Summer;5(1):15-25
pubmed: 23326627
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Oct;34(10):3246-52
pubmed: 23891733
Behav Modif. 2019 Nov;43(6):879-897
pubmed: 31104482
Dev Neurorehabil. 2020 Oct;23(7):431-438
pubmed: 32118503
Res Dev Disabil. 2010 Sep-Oct;31(5):1047-53
pubmed: 20472393
Perspect Behav Sci. 2020 Aug 12;43(4):655-675
pubmed: 33381684
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 14;18(18):
pubmed: 34574584
Front Public Health. 2018 Aug 28;6:234
pubmed: 30211146
Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Jan;48:35-42
pubmed: 26529065