Multimodality imaging review of ulnar nerve pathologies.

Ulnar neuropathy hypothenar hammer syndrome magnetic resonance neurography peripheral nerve ultrasound snapping triceps syndrome ulnar nerve imaging ulnar nerve leprosy

Journal

The neuroradiology journal
ISSN: 2385-1996
Titre abrégé: Neuroradiol J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101295103

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2024
Historique:
pubmed: 25 3 2023
medline: 25 3 2023
entrez: 24 3 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The ulnar nerve is the second most commonly entrapped nerve after the median nerve. Although clinical evaluation and electrodiagnostic studies remain widely used for the evaluation of ulnar neuropathy, advancements in imaging have led to increased utilization of these newer / better imaging techniques in the overall management of ulnar neuropathy. Specifically, high-resolution ultrasonography of peripheral nerves as well as MRI has become quite useful in evaluating the ulnar nerve in order to better guide treatment. The caliber and fascicular pattern identified in the normal ulnar nerves are important distinguishing features from ulnar nerve pathology. The cubital tunnel within the elbow and Guyon's canal within the wrist are important sites to evaluate with respect to ulnar nerve compression. Both acute and chronic conditions resulting in deformity, trauma as well as inflammatory conditions may predispose certain patients to ulnar neuropathy. Granulomatous diseases as well as both neurogenic and non-neurogenic tumors can also potentially result in ulnar neuropathy. Tumors around the ulnar nerve can also lead to mass effect on the nerve, particularly in tight spaces like the aforementioned canals. Although high-resolution ultrasonography is a useful modality initially, particularly as it can be helpful for dynamic evaluation, MRI remains most reliable due to its higher resolution. Newer imaging techniques like sonoelastography and microneurography, as well as nerve-specific contrast agents, are currently being investigated for their usefulness and are not routinely being used currently.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36961518
doi: 10.1177/19714009231166087
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

137-151

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Ranjit Kumar Chaudhary (RK)

Department of Radiology, St. Vincent's Medical Center, Bridgeport, CT, USA.

Nikitha Karkala (N)

Department of Radiology, Northwell North Shore University Hospital, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, Queens, NY, USA.

Pankaj Nepal (P)

Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Elina Gupta (E)

Department of Radiology, St. Vincent's Medical Center, Bridgeport, CT, USA.

Neeraj Kaur (N)

Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC, Canada.

Prem Batchala (P)

Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

Joshua Sapire (J)

Department of Radiology, St. Vincent's Medical Center, Bridgeport, CT, USA.

Syed Intkhab Alam (SI)

Department of Radiology, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.

Classifications MeSH