India may need an additional metric to assess the endemicity of malaria in low surveillance districts.
Journal
PLOS global public health
ISSN: 2767-3375
Titre abrégé: PLOS Glob Public Health
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9918283779606676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
04
02
2022
accepted:
19
10
2022
entrez:
24
3
2023
pubmed:
25
3
2023
medline:
25
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
India's National Framework for malaria elimination is essentially dependent on Annual Parasite Incidence (API). API is the primary criterion for classifying states and districts into different categories: intensified control, pre-elimination, elimination, prevention and re-establishment of malaria. However, API's validity is critically dependent on multiple factors, one such important factor is Annual Blood Examination Rate (ABER) and is often considered as indicator of operational efficiency. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine whether the API is a sufficiently good malaria index to assess malaria endemicity in India. An in-depth analysis of malaria data (2017-19) was done to determine the appropriateness of API as a sole indicator of malaria endemicity. We stratified the Indian districts into three strata based on Annual Blood Examination Rate (ABER): <5, 5.0-5.0, >15, further APIs was compared with Slide Positivity Rates (SPRs) using sign rank test, independently in each stratum. API and SPR were found comparable (p-value 0.323) in stratum 2 only. However, in the case of lower ABER (<5%, strata 1), the API was significantly lower than the SPR, and higher ABER (>15%), the API was found substantially higher than the SPR. Thus, ABER tunes the validity of API and should avoid to use as a single indicator of malaria endemicity. API is an appropriate measure of malaria endemicity in high and moderate transmission areas where surveillance is good (ABER≥5%). However, it is vitally dependent upon surveillance rate and other factors such as population size, the selection of individuals for malaria testing. Therefore, where surveillance is poor (<5%), we propose that API should be complemented with SPR and the number of cases. It will significantly aid the design and deployment of interventions in India.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36962502
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000326
pii: PGPH-D-22-00177
pmc: PMC10021988
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e0000326Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2022 Yadav et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Malar J. 2010 Jan 20;9:26
pubmed: 20089158
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Dec;77(6 Suppl):69-78
pubmed: 18165477
Malar J. 2009 Sep 15;8:213
pubmed: 19754955
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Nov 10;5(11):e28951
pubmed: 34757321
PLoS Med. 2010 Jun 15;7(6):e1000290
pubmed: 20563310
J Commun Dis. 1997 Mar;29(1):41-5
pubmed: 9282528
Malar J. 2012 Apr 18;11:117
pubmed: 22513123
Malar J. 2020 Apr 16;19(1):156
pubmed: 32299426
Popul Health Metr. 2010 Feb 11;8:1
pubmed: 20181218
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Dec;5(12):
pubmed: 33380414