Caesarean section or vaginal delivery for low-risk pregnancy? Helping women make an informed choice in low- and middle-income countries.
Journal
PLOS global public health
ISSN: 2767-3375
Titre abrégé: PLOS Glob Public Health
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9918283779606676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
17
12
2021
accepted:
13
10
2022
entrez:
24
3
2023
pubmed:
25
3
2023
medline:
25
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Women's fear and uncertainty about vaginal delivery and lack of empowerment in decision-making generate decision conflict and is one of the main determinants of high caesarean section rates in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study aims to develop a decision analysis tool (DAT) to help pregnant women make an informed choice about the planned mode of delivery and to evaluate its acceptability in Vietnam, Thailand, Argentina, and Burkina Faso. The DAT targets low-risk pregnant women with a healthy, singleton foetus, without any medical or obstetric disorder, no previous caesarean scarring, and eligibility for labour trials. We conducted a systematic review to determine the short- and long-term maternal and offspring risks and benefits of planned caesarean section compared to planned vaginal delivery. We carried out individual interviews and focus group discussions with key informants to capture informational needs for decision-making, and to assess the acceptability of the DAT in participating hospitals. The DAT meets 20 of the 22 Patient Decision Aid Standards for decision support. It includes low- to moderate-certainty evidence-based information on the risks and benefits of both modes of birth, and helps pregnant women clarify their personal values. It has been well accepted by women and health care providers. Adaptations have been made in each country to fit the context and to facilitate its implementation in current practice, including the development of an App. DAT is a simple method to improve communication and facilitate shared decision-making for planned modes of birth. It is expected to build trust and foster more effective, satisfactory dialogue between pregnant women and providers. It can be easily adapted and updated as new evidence emerges. We encourage further studies in LMICs to assess the impact of DAT on quality decision-making for the appropriate use of caesarean section in these settings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36962691
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001264
pii: PGPH-D-21-01106
pmc: PMC10022020
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e0001264Subventions
Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International
Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2022 Dumont et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1358-1368
pubmed: 30322586
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 16;8(12):e025073
pubmed: 30559163
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 26;9(2):e87896
pubmed: 24586295
Hum Reprod. 2013 Jul;28(7):1943-52
pubmed: 23644593
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jan 26;17(1):88
pubmed: 28126032
BJOG. 2015 Apr;122(5):731-9
pubmed: 25209160
Sante Publique. 2021;32(5):497-505
pubmed: 35724165
BMJ. 2011 Jan 25;342:d276
pubmed: 21266421
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Dec;108(6):1517-29
pubmed: 17138788
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2019 Oct 29;15:62
pubmed: 31687033
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4:CD001431
pubmed: 28402085
Bull World Health Organ. 2021 Oct 01;99(10):693-707F
pubmed: 34621087
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 21;(7):CD000166
pubmed: 26196961
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):23
pubmed: 33407245
BMC Med. 2010 Nov 10;8:71
pubmed: 21067593
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Nov;33(11):853-865
pubmed: 27635953
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Feb 21;8(1):
pubmed: 32098136
Birth. 2005 Dec;32(4):252-61
pubmed: 16336366
Med Decis Making. 2020 Apr;40(3):379-398
pubmed: 32428429
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Apr;72:117-128
pubmed: 32900599
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Apr;7(4):e513-e522
pubmed: 30879511
Eur Urol. 2016 Jul;70(1):148-158
pubmed: 26874810
BMJ. 2007 Jun 23;334(7607):1305
pubmed: 17540908
Rev Saude Publica. 2017;51:105
pubmed: 29166440
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jun;6(6):
pubmed: 34130991
Implement Sci. 2020 Sep 4;15(1):72
pubmed: 32887669
Reprod Health. 2013 Jan 14;10(1):2
pubmed: 23317141
Reprod Health. 2018 Jul 24;15(1):130
pubmed: 30041661
Clin Exp Allergy. 2008 Apr;38(4):634-42
pubmed: 18266879
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Oct;143(1):24-31
pubmed: 29920679
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(4):389-94
pubmed: 17486457
Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 May;95(5):1113-35
pubmed: 22456657
BJOG. 2011 Mar;118(4):391-9
pubmed: 21134103
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020 Nov;65(6):777-788
pubmed: 32767740
PLoS Med. 2018 Jan 23;15(1):e1002494
pubmed: 29360829
Semin Perinatol. 2006 Oct;30(5):276-87
pubmed: 17011400
PLoS One. 2021 May 5;16(5):e0251072
pubmed: 33951101
Int J Womens Health. 2014 May 05;6:469-78
pubmed: 24851057
J Asthma. 2015 Feb;52(1):16-25
pubmed: 25162303
Lancet. 2000 Nov 11;356(9242):1677-80
pubmed: 11089840
Lancet. 2019 May 11;393(10184):1973-1982
pubmed: 30929893