What, how and who: Cost-effectiveness analyses of COVID-19 vaccination to inform key policies in Nigeria.
Journal
PLOS global public health
ISSN: 2767-3375
Titre abrégé: PLOS Glob Public Health
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9918283779606676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
05
09
2022
accepted:
10
02
2023
entrez:
24
3
2023
pubmed:
25
3
2023
medline:
25
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
While safe and efficacious COVID-19 vaccines have achieved high coverage in high-income settings, roll-out remains slow in sub-Saharan Africa. By April 2022, Nigeria, a country of over 200 million people, had only distributed 34 million doses. To ensure the optimal use of health resources, cost-effectiveness analyses can inform key policy questions in the health technology assessment process. We carried out several cost-effectiveness analyses exploring different COVID-19 vaccination scenarios in Nigeria. In consultation with Nigerian stakeholders, we addressed three key questions: what vaccines to buy, how to deliver them and what age groups to target. We combined an epidemiological model of virus transmission parameterised with Nigeria specific data with a costing model that incorporated local resource use assumptions and prices, both for vaccine delivery as well as costs associated with care and treatment of COVID-19. Scenarios of vaccination were compared with no vaccination. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were estimated in terms of costs per disability-adjusted life years averted and compared to commonly used cost-effectiveness ratios. Viral vector vaccines are cost-effective (or cost saving), particularly when targeting older adults. Despite higher efficacy, vaccines employing mRNA technologies are less cost-effective due to high current dose prices. The method of delivery of vaccines makes little difference to the cost-effectiveness of the vaccine. COVID-19 vaccines can be highly effective and cost-effective (as well as cost-saving), although an important determinant of the latter is the price per dose and the age groups prioritised for vaccination. From a health system perspective, viral vector vaccines may represent most cost-effective choices for Nigeria, although this may change with price negotiation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36963054
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001693
pii: PGPH-D-22-01313
pmc: PMC10032534
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e0001693Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Ruiz et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Am J Epidemiol. 1992 Aug 1;136(3):328-43
pubmed: 1415152
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Aug;7(8):
pubmed: 35914832
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 May;7(5):
pubmed: 35618305
Value Health. 2016 Dec;19(8):921-928
pubmed: 27987641
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 May;20(5):533-534
pubmed: 32087114
Epidemics. 2022 Dec;41:100648
pubmed: 36343495
BMC Med. 2021 Dec 1;19(1):318
pubmed: 34847950
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 May 28;14:1233-1243
pubmed: 34093019
Science. 2021 Mar 12;371(6534):1107-1109
pubmed: 33632897
Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1205-1211
pubmed: 32546824
Lancet. 2022 Apr 16;399(10334):1513-1536
pubmed: 35279232
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Nov;39(11):1201-1208
pubmed: 34557996
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Dec;6(12):
pubmed: 34857521
Health Econ. 2021 Mar;30(3):699-707
pubmed: 33368853
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Jul;5(7):e375-e385
pubmed: 32502389
PLoS Med. 2021 Oct 4;18(10):e1003815
pubmed: 34606520