Evaluation of 16 molecular assays for the detection of orthopox and mpox viruses.

Analytical sensitivity Monkeypox virus Mpox Negative percent agreement Orthopoxvirus Polymerase chain reaction Positive percent agreement

Journal

Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology
ISSN: 1873-5967
Titre abrégé: J Clin Virol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9815671

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2023
Historique:
received: 20 11 2022
revised: 28 02 2023
accepted: 12 03 2023
medline: 4 4 2023
pubmed: 25 3 2023
entrez: 24 3 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The current global mpox virus (MPXV) outbreak has been declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern by WHO, with more than 80,000 cases confirmed across multiple continents. Diagnosis is confirmed by PCR of viral DNA from vesicle and other swabs. The aim of this study was to assess commercial RT PCR assays for Orthopoxvirus (OPX) and MPXV for analytical sensitivity, and percent agreements and compare them to primer/probe sets employed at the Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory (VIDRL), Centers for Disease Control andPrevention (CDC) and US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID). Limits of detection (LOD), intra-run variability, cross-reactivity and performance on forty clinical samples was assessed on eleven commercial assays and five primer/probe combinations used at VIDRL, CDC and USAMRIID. All assays were able to detect OPX and MPXV (LOD 57 to 14,495 copies/mL) with intra-run coefficients of variation between Cycle thresholds of 0.58 and 3.44, and there was no unexpected cross-reactivity. All assays demonstrated 100% negative percent agreement with clinical samples and all but one yielded 100% positive percent agreement. Variations in LOD between assays may be dependent on the platform used and sample type. Despite the overall comparable performance of the assays assessed, it is important that routine laboratories perform in-house validations before implementing RT PCR for OPX and/or MPXV as reliable and accurate laboratory diagnosis of MPXV and isolation is crucial to containing the spread of this current outbreak and informing public health interventions and response.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The current global mpox virus (MPXV) outbreak has been declared a Public Health Emergency of International Concern by WHO, with more than 80,000 cases confirmed across multiple continents. Diagnosis is confirmed by PCR of viral DNA from vesicle and other swabs.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to assess commercial RT PCR assays for Orthopoxvirus (OPX) and MPXV for analytical sensitivity, and percent agreements and compare them to primer/probe sets employed at the Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory (VIDRL), Centers for Disease Control andPrevention (CDC) and US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID). Limits of detection (LOD), intra-run variability, cross-reactivity and performance on forty clinical samples was assessed on eleven commercial assays and five primer/probe combinations used at VIDRL, CDC and USAMRIID.
RESULTS
All assays were able to detect OPX and MPXV (LOD 57 to 14,495 copies/mL) with intra-run coefficients of variation between Cycle thresholds of 0.58 and 3.44, and there was no unexpected cross-reactivity. All assays demonstrated 100% negative percent agreement with clinical samples and all but one yielded 100% positive percent agreement.
CONCLUSIONS
Variations in LOD between assays may be dependent on the platform used and sample type. Despite the overall comparable performance of the assays assessed, it is important that routine laboratories perform in-house validations before implementing RT PCR for OPX and/or MPXV as reliable and accurate laboratory diagnosis of MPXV and isolation is crucial to containing the spread of this current outbreak and informing public health interventions and response.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36963141
pii: S1386-6532(23)00046-X
doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2023.105424
pmc: PMC10020139
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

105424

Informations de copyright

Crown Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no Conflicts of Interests to declare.

Auteurs

Georgina Papadakis (G)

Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, Royal Melbourne Hospital, at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Vic 3000, Australia.

Thomas Tran (T)

Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, Royal Melbourne Hospital, at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Vic 3000, Australia.

Julian Druce (J)

Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, Royal Melbourne Hospital, at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Vic 3000, Australia.

Chuan Kok Lim (CK)

Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, Royal Melbourne Hospital, at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Vic 3000, Australia.

Deborah A Williamson (DA)

Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, Royal Melbourne Hospital, at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Vic 3000, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Melbourne at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Vic 3000, Australia.

Kathy Jackson (K)

Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, Royal Melbourne Hospital, at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Vic 3000, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH