Understanding the complexity of deinking plastic waste: An assessment of the efficiency of different treatments to remove ink resins from printed plastic film.

Deinking Liquefaction Polymer resin Printed plastic film Solubility

Journal

Journal of hazardous materials
ISSN: 1873-3336
Titre abrégé: J Hazard Mater
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9422688

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 Jun 2023
Historique:
received: 16 01 2023
revised: 05 03 2023
accepted: 16 03 2023
medline: 25 3 2023
pubmed: 25 3 2023
entrez: 24 3 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Plastic packaging is usually heavily printed with inks to provide functional benefits. However, the presence of inks strongly impedes the closed-loop recycling of plastic films. Various media have already been studied for the deinking of plastic films, but there is little scientific insight into the effectiveness of different deinking techniques. Therefore, this study aims to obtain a systematic understanding by measuring the liquefaction and maximum solubility of 14 chemically different polymer resins in seven different media typically used in plastic deinking, such as acetone, ethyl acetate, sodium hydroxide solution, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide solution, formic acid, sulfuric acid, and N,N-dimethylcyclohexylamine. Our findings show that acid-based media are able to remove a broader range of polymer resins. Organic solvents are particularly effective against acrylics and related polymer resins. The deinking efficiency tests on pure resins are also confirmed by deinking four printed plastic films containing different classes of polymer resins. A basic cost and environmental impact analysis is given to evaluate scale-up potential of the deinking medium.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36963193
pii: S0304-3894(23)00521-6
doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131239
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

131239

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Sibel Ügdüler (S)

Laboratory for Circular Process Engineering (LCPE), Department of Green Chemistry and Technology, Ghent University, Graaf Karel De Goedelaan 5, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium.

Tine Van Laere (T)

Laboratory for Circular Process Engineering (LCPE), Department of Green Chemistry and Technology, Ghent University, Graaf Karel De Goedelaan 5, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium.

Tobias De Somer (T)

Laboratory for Circular Process Engineering (LCPE), Department of Green Chemistry and Technology, Ghent University, Graaf Karel De Goedelaan 5, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium.

Sergei Gusev (S)

Laboratory for Circular Process Engineering (LCPE), Department of Green Chemistry and Technology, Ghent University, Graaf Karel De Goedelaan 5, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium.

Kevin M Van Geem (KM)

Laboratory for Chemical Technology (LCT), Department of Materials, Textiles, and Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Ghent University, Technologiepark 121, B-9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium.

Andreas Kulawig (A)

Siegwerk Druckfarben AG & Co KGaA, Alfred-Keller-Str. 55, 53721 Siegburg, Germany.

Ralf Leineweber (R)

Siegwerk Druckfarben AG & Co KGaA, Alfred-Keller-Str. 55, 53721 Siegburg, Germany.

Marc Defoin (M)

Bostik, Crèvecœur-sur-l'Escaut, Hauts-de-France, France.

Hugues Van den Bergen (H)

Allnex, Anderlechtstraat 33, B-1620 Drogenbos, Belgium.

Dirk Bontinck (D)

Allnex, Anderlechtstraat 33, B-1620 Drogenbos, Belgium.

Steven De Meester (S)

Laboratory for Circular Process Engineering (LCPE), Department of Green Chemistry and Technology, Ghent University, Graaf Karel De Goedelaan 5, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium. Electronic address: Steven.DeMeester@UGent.be.

Classifications MeSH