Genome-wide analysis of a collective grave from Mentesh Tepe provides insight into the population structure of early neolithic population in the South Caucasus.
Journal
Communications biology
ISSN: 2399-3642
Titre abrégé: Commun Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101719179
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 03 2023
25 03 2023
Historique:
received:
07
09
2022
accepted:
08
03
2023
medline:
28
3
2023
entrez:
25
3
2023
pubmed:
26
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Despite the localisation of the southern Caucasus at the outskirt of the Fertile Crescent, the Neolithisation process started there only at the beginning of the sixth millennium with the Shomutepe-Shulaveri culture of yet unclear origins. We present here genomic data for three new individuals from Mentesh Tepe in Azerbaijan, dating back to the beginnings of the Shomutepe-Shulaveri culture. We evidence that two juveniles, buried embracing each other, were brothers. We show that the Mentesh Tepe Neolithic population is the product of a recent gene flow between the Anatolian farmer-related population and the Caucasus/Iranian population, demonstrating that population admixture was at the core of the development of agriculture in the South Caucasus. By comparing Bronze Age individuals from the South Caucasus with Neolithic individuals from the same region, including Mentesh Tepe, we evidence that gene flows between Pontic Steppe populations and Mentesh Tepe-related groups contributed to the makeup of the Late Bronze Age and modern Caucasian populations. Our results show that the high cultural diversity during the Neolithic period of the South Caucasus deserves close genetic analysis.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36966245
doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-04681-w
pii: 10.1038/s42003-023-04681-w
pmc: PMC10039893
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
319Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Science. 2019 Jul 12;365(6449):173-176
pubmed: 31296769
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Sep 24;110(39):15758-63
pubmed: 24019490
Mol Ecol. 2010 Mar;19(5):999-1013
pubmed: 20149088
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 28;11(1):21262
pubmed: 34711884
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 09;6:31326
pubmed: 27502179
Gigascience. 2015 Feb 25;4:7
pubmed: 25722852
Nature. 2015 Jun 11;522(7555):207-11
pubmed: 25731166
Nat Commun. 2019 Feb 4;10(1):590
pubmed: 30713341
Genome Biol. 2020 Sep 15;21(1):246
pubmed: 32933569
Curr Biol. 2021 Aug 23;31(16):3564-3574.e9
pubmed: 34256019
Science. 2019 Sep 6;365(6457):
pubmed: 31488661
Front Genet. 2022 Aug 22;13:884612
pubmed: 36072661
Nat Genet. 2006 Aug;38(8):904-9
pubmed: 16862161
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 23;13(4):e0195491
pubmed: 29684051
Bioinformatics. 2009 Jul 15;25(14):1754-60
pubmed: 19451168
Genetics. 2021 Apr 15;217(4):
pubmed: 33772284
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Feb 12;9:88
pubmed: 26868221
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2018 Dec;167(4):856-875
pubmed: 30351449
Genome Biol. 2016 Mar 31;17:60
pubmed: 27036623
Nat Rev Genet. 2020 Jun;21(6):355-366
pubmed: 32127690
Cell. 2020 May 28;181(5):1158-1175.e28
pubmed: 32470401
Science. 2011 Oct 7;334(6052):94-8
pubmed: 21940856
Cell. 2022 May 26;185(11):1842-1859.e18
pubmed: 35561686
Genetics. 2012 Nov;192(3):1065-93
pubmed: 22960212
Bioinformatics. 2013 Jul 01;29(13):1682-4
pubmed: 23613487
Science. 2022 Aug 26;377(6609):eabm4247
pubmed: 36007055
PLoS Genet. 2006 Dec;2(12):e190
pubmed: 17194218
Hum Mutat. 2011 Jan;32(1):25-32
pubmed: 20960467
Science. 2022 Aug 26;377(6609):982-987
pubmed: 36007054
BMC Bioinformatics. 2014 Nov 25;15:356
pubmed: 25420514
Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Sep;81(3):559-75
pubmed: 17701901
Genome Res. 2009 Sep;19(9):1655-64
pubmed: 19648217
Nat Commun. 2019 Mar 19;10(1):1218
pubmed: 30890703
Bioinformatics. 2009 Aug 15;25(16):2078-9
pubmed: 19505943
Nat Commun. 2015 Nov 16;6:8912
pubmed: 26567969
Nature. 2016 Aug 25;536(7617):419-24
pubmed: 27459054
Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2017 Feb 8;5:329-351
pubmed: 27813680