High resection rates of colorectal liver metastases after standardized follow-up and multimodal management: an outcome study within the COLOFOL trial.
Journal
HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association
ISSN: 1477-2574
Titre abrégé: HPB (Oxford)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100900921
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2023
Jul 2023
Historique:
received:
27
10
2022
revised:
27
01
2023
accepted:
03
03
2023
medline:
19
6
2023
pubmed:
27
3
2023
entrez:
26
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Outcome after colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) resection has improved over time, despite increased resection rates. Hence, it's crucial to identify all patients possible to treat with curative intent. The objectives of this study were to map recurrence pattern, treatment strategy and survival depending on treatment and follow-up strategy. In the COLOFOL-trial, patients with radically resected stage II-III colorectal cancer were randomized to high-frequency (6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months; HF) or low-frequency (12 and 36 months; LF) follow-up. In this study, all CRLM within 5 years were identified and medical files scrutinized. Overall survival (OS) was analysed in uni- and multivariable analyses. Primary endpoint was 5-year OS. Of 2442 patients, 235 (9.6%) developed metachronous CRLM of which 123 (52.3%) underwent treatment with curative intent, resulting in 5-year OS of 58%. Five-year OS for patients with CRLM was 43% after HF versus 24% after LF. The survival benefit was confirmed for HF 8 years from resection of the primary tumour, HR 0.63 (CI 0.46-0.85). A high proportion of metachronous CRLM was possible to treat with curative intent, yielding high survival rates. More intense follow-up after colorectal cancer resection might be of value in high-risk patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Outcome after colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) resection has improved over time, despite increased resection rates. Hence, it's crucial to identify all patients possible to treat with curative intent. The objectives of this study were to map recurrence pattern, treatment strategy and survival depending on treatment and follow-up strategy.
METHODS
METHODS
In the COLOFOL-trial, patients with radically resected stage II-III colorectal cancer were randomized to high-frequency (6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months; HF) or low-frequency (12 and 36 months; LF) follow-up. In this study, all CRLM within 5 years were identified and medical files scrutinized. Overall survival (OS) was analysed in uni- and multivariable analyses. Primary endpoint was 5-year OS.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Of 2442 patients, 235 (9.6%) developed metachronous CRLM of which 123 (52.3%) underwent treatment with curative intent, resulting in 5-year OS of 58%. Five-year OS for patients with CRLM was 43% after HF versus 24% after LF. The survival benefit was confirmed for HF 8 years from resection of the primary tumour, HR 0.63 (CI 0.46-0.85).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
A high proportion of metachronous CRLM was possible to treat with curative intent, yielding high survival rates. More intense follow-up after colorectal cancer resection might be of value in high-risk patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36967324
pii: S1365-182X(23)00075-8
doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.03.003
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
766-774Investigateurs
Peer Wille-Jørgensen
(P)
Erzsébet Horváth-Puhó
(E)
Søren Laurberg
(S)
Lars Påhlman
(L)
Andrew Renehan
(A)
Kenneth Smedh
(K)
Ingvar Syk
(I)
Henrik Christensen
(H)
Jesper Dan Nielsen
(JD)
Per Jess
(P)
Allan Gorm Pedersen
(AG)
Mogens Rørbæk Madsen
(MR)
Per Vadgaard Andersen
(PV)
Erling Østergaard
(E)
Pernilla Hansdotter Andersson
(PH)
Jonas Bengtsson
(J)
Mats Bragmark
(M)
Pamela Buchwald
(P)
Monika Egenvall
(M)
Parastau Farahnak
(P)
Joakim Folkesson
(J)
Michael Goldinger
(M)
Rolf Heuman
(R)
Kenneth Lindberg
(K)
Anna Martling
(A)
Pia Näsvall
(P)
Johan Ottosson
(J)
Birger Sandzén
(B)
Carlos Barberousse
(C)
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.