Durability of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) in Ethiopia.
Alpha-cypermethrin
Attrition
Bio-efficacy
Deltamethrin
Durability
Ethiopia
LLIN
Malaria
Physical-integrity
Survival
Journal
Malaria journal
ISSN: 1475-2875
Titre abrégé: Malar J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101139802
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Mar 2023
26 Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
03
02
2023
accepted:
22
03
2023
medline:
28
3
2023
entrez:
26
3
2023
pubmed:
27
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The functional survival time of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs), which varies across different field contexts, is critical for the successful prevention of malaria transmission. However, there is limited data on LLIN durability in field settings in Ethiopia. A three-year longitudinal study was conducted to monitor attrition, physical integrity, and bio-efficacy and residual chemical concentration of LLINs in four regions in Ethiopia. World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines were used to determine sample size, measure physical integrity, and calculate attrition rates, and functional survival time. Yearly bio-efficacy testing was done on randomly selected LLINs. An excel tool developed by vector works project was used to calculate the median functional survival time of the LLINs. Predictors of functional survival were identified by fitting binary and multivariate cox proportional hazards model. A total of 3,396 LLINs were included in the analysis. A total of 3,396 LLINs were included in the analysis. By the end of 36 months, the proportion of LLINs functionally surviving was 12.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.5, 15.6], the rates of attrition due to physical damage and repurposing were 48.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 45.0, 52.6] and 13.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.6, 14.6], respectively. The estimated median functional survival time was 19 months (95%CI 17, 21). Factors associated with shorter functional survival time include being in a low malaria transmission setting [Adjusted Hazards Ratio (AHR) (95%CI) 1.77 (1.22, 2.55)], rural locations [AHR (95%CI) 1.83 (1.17, 2.84)], and in a room where cooking occurs [AHR (95%CI) 1.28 (1.05, 1.55)]. Bioassay tests revealed that 95.3% (95%CI 86.4, 98.5) of the LLINs met the WHO criteria of bio-efficacy after 24 months of distribution. The LLIN survival time was shorter than the expected three years due to high attrition rates and rapid loss of physical integrity. National malaria programmes may consider, procuring more durable LLINs, educating communities on how to prevent damage of LLINs, and revising the current three-year LLIN distribution schedule to ensure sufficient protection is provided by LLINs against malaria transmission. While this paper contributes to the understanding of determinants impacting functional survival, further research is needed to understand factors for the rapid attrition rates and loss of physical integrity of LLINs in field settings.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The functional survival time of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs), which varies across different field contexts, is critical for the successful prevention of malaria transmission. However, there is limited data on LLIN durability in field settings in Ethiopia.
METHODS
METHODS
A three-year longitudinal study was conducted to monitor attrition, physical integrity, and bio-efficacy and residual chemical concentration of LLINs in four regions in Ethiopia. World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines were used to determine sample size, measure physical integrity, and calculate attrition rates, and functional survival time. Yearly bio-efficacy testing was done on randomly selected LLINs. An excel tool developed by vector works project was used to calculate the median functional survival time of the LLINs. Predictors of functional survival were identified by fitting binary and multivariate cox proportional hazards model.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 3,396 LLINs were included in the analysis. A total of 3,396 LLINs were included in the analysis. By the end of 36 months, the proportion of LLINs functionally surviving was 12.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.5, 15.6], the rates of attrition due to physical damage and repurposing were 48.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 45.0, 52.6] and 13.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.6, 14.6], respectively. The estimated median functional survival time was 19 months (95%CI 17, 21). Factors associated with shorter functional survival time include being in a low malaria transmission setting [Adjusted Hazards Ratio (AHR) (95%CI) 1.77 (1.22, 2.55)], rural locations [AHR (95%CI) 1.83 (1.17, 2.84)], and in a room where cooking occurs [AHR (95%CI) 1.28 (1.05, 1.55)]. Bioassay tests revealed that 95.3% (95%CI 86.4, 98.5) of the LLINs met the WHO criteria of bio-efficacy after 24 months of distribution.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The LLIN survival time was shorter than the expected three years due to high attrition rates and rapid loss of physical integrity. National malaria programmes may consider, procuring more durable LLINs, educating communities on how to prevent damage of LLINs, and revising the current three-year LLIN distribution schedule to ensure sufficient protection is provided by LLINs against malaria transmission. While this paper contributes to the understanding of determinants impacting functional survival, further research is needed to understand factors for the rapid attrition rates and loss of physical integrity of LLINs in field settings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36967389
doi: 10.1186/s12936-023-04540-3
pii: 10.1186/s12936-023-04540-3
pmc: PMC10041722
doi:
Substances chimiques
Insecticides
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
109Subventions
Organisme : FIC NIH HHS
ID : D43 TW011386
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
PLoS Med. 2011 Apr;8(4):e1001019
pubmed: 21532734
BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Feb 08;14:69
pubmed: 24507444
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015 Feb;92(2):286-93
pubmed: 25404079
Infect Dis Poverty. 2018 Nov 05;7(1):103
pubmed: 30392470
Parasit Vectors. 2017 Nov 13;10(1):564
pubmed: 29132421
Malar J. 2017 Oct 2;16(1):396
pubmed: 28969636
Malar J. 2013 Jul 15;12:242
pubmed: 23855778
Malar J. 2011 Apr 14;10:87
pubmed: 21492423
Malar J. 2011 Oct 13;10:299
pubmed: 21992483
Malar J. 2015 Mar 24;14:123
pubmed: 25890233
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 05;10(6):e0128499
pubmed: 26047494
Malar J. 2018 Jun 20;17(1):239
pubmed: 29925371
Parasit Vectors. 2020 Jan 20;13(1):35
pubmed: 31959237
Malar J. 2020 Feb 4;19(1):58
pubmed: 32019586
Malar J. 2016 Mar 18;15:176
pubmed: 26993981
Malar J. 2016 Feb 19;15:106
pubmed: 26891696
Malar J. 2014 Nov 27;13:464
pubmed: 25430956
Malar J. 2012 Jun 07;11:183
pubmed: 22676648
Med Vet Entomol. 2004 Jun;18(2):153-60
pubmed: 15189240
Parasit Vectors. 2014 Jan 04;7:6
pubmed: 24387635
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2012 Sep;87(3):407-411
pubmed: 22802441