Napabucasin plus nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine versus nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine in previously untreated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: an adaptive multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3, superiority trial.
Adenocarcinoma
Metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma
Napabucasin
Pancreatic cancer
Phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 3
Journal
EClinicalMedicine
ISSN: 2589-5370
Titre abrégé: EClinicalMedicine
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101733727
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2023
Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
28
03
2022
revised:
17
01
2023
accepted:
17
02
2023
entrez:
27
3
2023
pubmed:
28
3
2023
medline:
28
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Compared with normal cells, tumour cells contain elevated levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Increased levels of the antioxidant protein NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) and phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (pSTAT3) correlate negatively with the survival of patients with pancreatic cancer. Napabucasin is an investigational, orally administered ROS generator bioactivated by NQO1. In the open-label, phase 3 CanStem111P study (NCT02993731), adults with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) were randomised (1:1) to napabucasin plus nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine or nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine alone. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). In exploratory analyses, OS was evaluated in the subgroup of patients with tumours positive for pSTAT3 (biomarker-positive). Between 30 January 2017 and 20 February 2019, a total of 1779 patients were screened across 165 study sites in Austria, Australia, Belgium, Canada, China, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Singapore, Spain, Taiwan, Ukraine, and the US. Of the 565 and 569 patients randomised to the napabucasin and control treatment arms, respectively, 206 and 176 were biomarker-positive. Median (95% confidence interval [CI]) OS in the napabucasin and control treatment arms was 11.4 (10.5-12.2) and 11.7 (10.7-12.7) months, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.93-1.23). Due to the lack of OS improvement in the napabucasin arm, CanStem111P was terminated due to futility. In the biomarker-positive subgroup, no difference between treatment arms was found for OS. Grade ≥3 adverse events were reported in 85.4% and 83.9% of napabucasin-treated and control-treated patients, respectively. The incidence of gastrointestinal-related grade ≥3 events was higher with napabucasin (diarrhoea: 11.6% vs 4.9%; abdominal pain: 10.0% vs 4.8%). Our findings suggested that although the addition of napabucasin to nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine did not improve efficacy in patients with previously untreated mPDAC, the safety profile of napabucasin was consistent with previous reports. CanStem111P represents the largest cohort of patients with mPDAC administered nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine in the clinical trial setting. Our data reinforce the value of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as a platform for novel therapeutics approaches in mPDAC. The Sumitomo Pharma Oncology, Inc.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Compared with normal cells, tumour cells contain elevated levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Increased levels of the antioxidant protein NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1) and phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (pSTAT3) correlate negatively with the survival of patients with pancreatic cancer. Napabucasin is an investigational, orally administered ROS generator bioactivated by NQO1.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
In the open-label, phase 3 CanStem111P study (NCT02993731), adults with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) were randomised (1:1) to napabucasin plus nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine or nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine alone. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). In exploratory analyses, OS was evaluated in the subgroup of patients with tumours positive for pSTAT3 (biomarker-positive).
Findings
UNASSIGNED
Between 30 January 2017 and 20 February 2019, a total of 1779 patients were screened across 165 study sites in Austria, Australia, Belgium, Canada, China, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Singapore, Spain, Taiwan, Ukraine, and the US. Of the 565 and 569 patients randomised to the napabucasin and control treatment arms, respectively, 206 and 176 were biomarker-positive. Median (95% confidence interval [CI]) OS in the napabucasin and control treatment arms was 11.4 (10.5-12.2) and 11.7 (10.7-12.7) months, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.93-1.23). Due to the lack of OS improvement in the napabucasin arm, CanStem111P was terminated due to futility. In the biomarker-positive subgroup, no difference between treatment arms was found for OS. Grade ≥3 adverse events were reported in 85.4% and 83.9% of napabucasin-treated and control-treated patients, respectively. The incidence of gastrointestinal-related grade ≥3 events was higher with napabucasin (diarrhoea: 11.6% vs 4.9%; abdominal pain: 10.0% vs 4.8%).
Interpretation
UNASSIGNED
Our findings suggested that although the addition of napabucasin to nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine did not improve efficacy in patients with previously untreated mPDAC, the safety profile of napabucasin was consistent with previous reports. CanStem111P represents the largest cohort of patients with mPDAC administered nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine in the clinical trial setting. Our data reinforce the value of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as a platform for novel therapeutics approaches in mPDAC.
Funding
UNASSIGNED
The Sumitomo Pharma Oncology, Inc.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36969338
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101897
pii: S2589-5370(23)00074-3
pmc: PMC10036520
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
101897Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Tanios Bekaii-Saab has received research funding (paid to institution) from Agios, Arys, Arcus, Atreca, Boston Biomedical, Bayer, Amgen, Merck, Celgene, Lilly, Ipsen, Clovis, Seattle Genetics, Genentech, Novartis, Mirati, Merus, Abgenomics, Incyte, Pfizer, and Bristol Myers Squibb; served as a consultant (paid to institution) to Ipsen, Array, Pfizer, Seattle Genetics, Bayer, Genentech, Incyte, and Merck; served as a consultant (paid to self) to AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Eisai, Daichii Sankyo, Natera, TreosBio, Celularity, Exact Science, Sobi, Beigene, Xilis, AstraZeneca, and Foundation Medicine; served on independent data monitoring committees/data and safety monitoring boards (paid to self) for AstraZeneca, Exelixis, Lilly, PanCan, and 1Globe; participated in advisory boards for Imugene, Immuneering, and Sun Biopharma; and holds the following inventions/patents: WO/2018/183488 and WO/2019/055687. Takuji Okusaka has received research grants (paid to self and institution) from Eisai, Eli Lilly, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Oncology, AstraZeneca, Chugai, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Baxter, and Taiho; participates in advisory boards for Sumitomo Pharma Oncology, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Nihon Servier; and has been a member of speakers' bureaus at Eisai, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Sumitomo Pharma Oncology, AstraZeneca, Chugai, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Taiho, Nihon Servier, Ono, Yakult Honsha, Daiichi Sankyo, Nippon Shinyaku, Pfizer, and Mundipharma. Do-Youn Oh participates in advisory boards (paid to self) for AstraZeneca, Novartis, Genentech/Roche, 13 Merck Serono, Bayer, Taiho, ASLAN, Halozyme, Zymeworks, Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene, BeiGene, Basilea, Turning Point, Yuhan, Arcus Biosciences and IQVIA and has received research grants (paid to institution) from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Array, Eli Lilly, 15 Servier, BeiGene, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Handok. Makoto Ueno has been an invited speaker (paid to self) for Taiho, Yakult Honsha, AstraZeneca, Merck, Eisai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Servier, and Chugai and has received research grants (paid to institution) from Astellas, Taiho, Eisai, AstraZeneca, Ono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck, Incyte, and Chugai. Tatsuya Ioka is a member of speakers’ bureaus at and serves as an advisor to Taiho (paid to self), is on the advisory board (paid to self) at Incyte, and has received research grants (paid to institution) from AstraZeneca, Incyte, Eisai, and Astellas. Michele Reni has participated in advisory boards (paid to self) for Eli Lilly, Celgene, AstraZeneca, Shire, Baxter, Servier, SOTIO, Viatris, and Merck Sharp & Dohme. Hye Jin Choi has received consulting fees (paid to self) from AstraZeneca and Roche. Josep Tabernero has participated in advisory boards (paid to self) for Array, AstraZeneca, Avvinity, Bayer, Boehringer, Chugai, Daiichi Sankyo, F. Hoffman La Roche, Genentech, HalioDx, Hutinson, Ikena Oncology, IQVIA, Lily, Menarini, Merck Serono, Merus, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mirati, Neophore, Novartis, Orion, Peptomyc, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Samsung Biologics, Sanofi, Seattle Genomics, Servier, Taiho, Tessa, and Theramyc. Jian Li is a salaried employee of Sumitomo Pharma Oncology. Emma Foos was a salaried employee of Sumitomo Pharma Oncology at the time that these analyses were undertaken. Cindy Oh was a salaried employee of Sumitomo Pharma Oncology at the time that these analyses were undertaken. Eric Van Cutsem has participated in advisory boards Abbvie, ALX, Amgen, Array, Astellas, Astrazeneca, Bayer, Beigene, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi, GSK, Incyte, Ipsen, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck KGaA, Mirati, Novartis, Nordic, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Roche, Seattle Genetics, Servier, Takeda, Terumo, Taiho, Zymeworks. His institution has also received research grants from Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ipsen, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck KGaA, Novartis, Roche, Servier. Weijia Fang, Eric C. Anderson, Jonathan S. Goldberg, Sang Cheul Oh, David Goldstein, Marcus Noel, and Chung-Pin Li have nothing to disclose.
Références
J Biol Chem. 2018 May 18;293(20):7499-7507
pubmed: 29282291
Mol Carcinog. 2017 Jul;56(7):1825-1834
pubmed: 28639725
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e214708
pubmed: 33825840
N Engl J Med. 2011 May 12;364(19):1817-25
pubmed: 21561347
Ann Oncol. 2021 May;32(5):600-608
pubmed: 33539945
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Dec 1;25(23):7162-7174
pubmed: 31527169
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jun 24;12(6):
pubmed: 32599886
Ann Oncol. 2015 Sep;26 Suppl 5:v56-68
pubmed: 26314780
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2015 Sep;46(3):201-11
pubmed: 25972062
Oncol Lett. 2017 May;13(5):2996-3002
pubmed: 28521407
Genes (Basel). 2020 Dec 29;12(1):
pubmed: 33383713
N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 31;369(18):1691-703
pubmed: 24131140
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
Drugs. 2017 Jul;77(10):1091-1103
pubmed: 28573435
Cancer Cell. 2011 Apr 12;19(4):441-55
pubmed: 21481787
Carcinogenesis. 2015 Jan;36(1):142-50
pubmed: 25411359
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013 Dec;12(12):931-47
pubmed: 24287781
J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 May;17(5):887-98
pubmed: 23435739
Mol Cancer Res. 2019 Jul;17(7):1429-1434
pubmed: 31043490
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Apr;3(4):263-270
pubmed: 29397354
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 20;38(27):3185-3194
pubmed: 32706635
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Feb 10;112(6):1839-44
pubmed: 25605917
Neoplasma. 2012;59(1):52-61
pubmed: 22082308
Cancer Cell. 2011 Apr 12;19(4):456-69
pubmed: 21481788