Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative local staging of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
Rectal cancer
magnetic resonance imaging
neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
neoplasm staging
surgical pathology
Journal
Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey)
ISSN: 1305-3612
Titre abrégé: Diagn Interv Radiol
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101241152
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 03 2023
29 03 2023
Historique:
medline:
30
3
2023
entrez:
27
3
2023
pubmed:
28
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This paper aims to investigate the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in predicting the pathologic stage of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and the role of MRI in selecting patients with a pathologic complete response (ypCR). Restaging MRI (yMRI) examinations of 136 patients with LARC treated with neoadjuvant CRT followed by surgery were retrospectively analyzed by two radiologists. All examinations were performed on a 1.5 Tesla MRI machine with a pelvic phased-array coil. T2-weighted turbo spin-echo images and diffusion-weighted imaging were obtained. Histopathologic reports of the surgical specimens were the reference standard. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) of yMRI in predicting the pathologic T-stage (ypT), N-stage, and ypCR were calculated. The inter-observer agreement was evaluated using kappa statistics. The yMRI results showed 67% accuracy, 59% sensitivity, 80% specificity, 81% PPV, and 56% NPV in identifying ypT (ypT0-2 versus ypT3-4). In predicting the nodal status, the yMRI results revealed 63% accuracy, 60% sensitivity, 65% specificity, 47% PPV, and 75% NPV. In predicting ypCR, the yMRI results showed 84% accuracy, 20% sensitivity, 92% specificity, 23% PPV, and 90% NPV. The kappa statistics revealed substantial agreement between the two radiologists. Utilization of yMRI showed high specificity and PPV in predicting the tumor stage and high NPV in predicting the nodal stage; in addition, yMRI revealed moderate accuracy in the T and N classifications, mainly due to underestimating the tumor stage and overestimating the nodal status. Finally, yMRI revealed high specificity and NPV but low sensitivity in predicting the complete response.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36971272
doi: 10.4274/dir.2022.221333
pmc: PMC10679710
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
219-227Références
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Aug;18(8):2224-31
pubmed: 21347783
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Dec 1;23(23):7253-7262
pubmed: 28939744
Br J Cancer. 2017 Nov 7;117(10):1478-1485
pubmed: 28934761
Radiographics. 2019 Mar-Apr;39(2):367-387
pubmed: 30768361
Radiother Oncol. 2020 Apr;145:223-228
pubmed: 32065902
Radiology. 2013 Oct;269(1):101-12
pubmed: 23801777
World J Gastroenterol. 2020 Aug 7;26(29):4218-4239
pubmed: 32848330
Radiology. 2018 Jun;287(3):833-843
pubmed: 29514017
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Mar;208(3):W79-W84
pubmed: 27959622
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Oct 1;29(28):3753-60
pubmed: 21876084
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug;27(8):2732-2739
pubmed: 32172333
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2020 Feb;28(1):117-126
pubmed: 31753231
Radiographics. 2010 Mar;30(2):503-16
pubmed: 20228331
Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 Apr;59(4):255-63
pubmed: 26953983
Eur Radiol. 2013 Dec;23(12):3354-60
pubmed: 23821022
Eur Radiol. 2017 Oct;27(10):4445-4454
pubmed: 28409357
Eur J Radiol. 2020 Oct;131:109238
pubmed: 32905955
Abdom Imaging. 2015 Oct;40(7):2613-29
pubmed: 25759246
Radiother Oncol. 2014 Oct;113(1):18-23
pubmed: 25245559
Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2010 Oct;19(4):829-45
pubmed: 20883957
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Jun 1;71(2):456-61
pubmed: 18164860
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016 Oct;41(10):1906-17
pubmed: 27323759
Eur J Radiol. 2017 Oct;95:155-168
pubmed: 28987662
Radiology. 2009 Oct;253(1):116-25
pubmed: 19789256
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 5;14(2):e0211830
pubmed: 30721268
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Mar;60(3):274-283
pubmed: 28177989
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Sep;26(3):662-71
pubmed: 17729365
Ann Surg. 2004 Oct;240(4):711-7; discussion 717-8
pubmed: 15383798
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Sep;11(9):835-44
pubmed: 20692872
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Jun;31(6):1157-62
pubmed: 27055660
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019 Nov;44(11):3595-3605
pubmed: 31444557
JAMA Surg. 2020 Jul 1;155(7):657-658
pubmed: 32347912
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 8;11(1):5379
pubmed: 33686147
Radiother Oncol. 2012 Mar;102(3):371-6
pubmed: 22280807
Insights Imaging. 2019 Feb 13;10(1):15
pubmed: 30758688
Radiographics. 2010 May;30(3):699-716
pubmed: 20462989
Eur Radiol. 2018 Apr;28(4):1465-1475
pubmed: 29043428
Cancer Radiother. 2019 Jun;23(3):216-221
pubmed: 31109840
Eur Radiol. 2016 Feb;26(2):390-7
pubmed: 26065396