User interfaces for actuated scope maneuvering in surgical systems: a scoping review.
Minimally invasive surgery
Robotic scope control
Surgical systems
User interface
Journal
Surgical endoscopy
ISSN: 1432-2218
Titre abrégé: Surg Endosc
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8806653
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2023
06 2023
Historique:
received:
02
11
2022
accepted:
25
02
2023
medline:
5
6
2023
pubmed:
28
3
2023
entrez:
27
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A variety of human computer interfaces are used by robotic surgical systems to control and actuate camera scopes during minimally invasive surgery. The purpose of this review is to examine the different user interfaces used in both commercial systems and research prototypes. A comprehensive scoping review of scientific literature was conducted using PubMed and IEEE Xplore databases to identify user interfaces used in commercial products and research prototypes of robotic surgical systems and robotic scope holders. Papers related to actuated scopes with human-computer interfaces were included. Several aspects of user interfaces for scope manipulation in commercial and research systems were reviewed. Scope assistance was classified into robotic surgical systems (for multiple port, single port, and natural orifice) and robotic scope holders (for rigid, articulated, and flexible endoscopes). Benefits and drawbacks of control by different user interfaces such as foot, hand, voice, head, eye, and tool tracking were outlined. In the review, it was observed that hand control, with its familiarity and intuitiveness, is the most used interface in commercially available systems. Control by foot, head tracking, and tool tracking are increasingly used to address limitations, such as interruptions to surgical workflow, caused by using a hand interface. Integrating a combination of different user interfaces for scope manipulation may provide maximum benefit for the surgeons. However, smooth transition between interfaces might pose a challenge while combining controls.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
A variety of human computer interfaces are used by robotic surgical systems to control and actuate camera scopes during minimally invasive surgery. The purpose of this review is to examine the different user interfaces used in both commercial systems and research prototypes.
METHODS
A comprehensive scoping review of scientific literature was conducted using PubMed and IEEE Xplore databases to identify user interfaces used in commercial products and research prototypes of robotic surgical systems and robotic scope holders. Papers related to actuated scopes with human-computer interfaces were included. Several aspects of user interfaces for scope manipulation in commercial and research systems were reviewed.
RESULTS
Scope assistance was classified into robotic surgical systems (for multiple port, single port, and natural orifice) and robotic scope holders (for rigid, articulated, and flexible endoscopes). Benefits and drawbacks of control by different user interfaces such as foot, hand, voice, head, eye, and tool tracking were outlined. In the review, it was observed that hand control, with its familiarity and intuitiveness, is the most used interface in commercially available systems. Control by foot, head tracking, and tool tracking are increasingly used to address limitations, such as interruptions to surgical workflow, caused by using a hand interface.
CONCLUSION
Integrating a combination of different user interfaces for scope manipulation may provide maximum benefit for the surgeons. However, smooth transition between interfaces might pose a challenge while combining controls.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36971815
doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09981-0
pii: 10.1007/s00464-023-09981-0
pmc: PMC10234960
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4193-4223Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jul;33(7):2206-2216
pubmed: 30334160
J Biomed Inform. 2020 Jul;107:103463
pubmed: 32562897
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2010 Apr;19(2):105-9
pubmed: 20158410
Int J Med Robot. 2020 Aug;16(4):e2113
pubmed: 32304167
Surg Endosc. 2022 Nov;36(11):8397-8402
pubmed: 35182219
Int J Med Robot. 2022 Apr;18(2):e2358
pubmed: 34953033
J Minim Access Surg. 2020 Jul-Sep;16(3):235-238
pubmed: 31031326
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018 Sep;100(Suppl 7):4-13
pubmed: 30179048
Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1636-1655
pubmed: 29442240
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2018 Sep;11073:72-80
pubmed: 31098598
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2017 Dec;78(6):466-472
pubmed: 29134165
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Feb;289(2):341-8
pubmed: 23959091
Surg Innov. 2015 Aug;22(4):432-40
pubmed: 25249584
Ann Biomed Eng. 2021 Sep;49(9):2282-2296
pubmed: 33834351
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2019 Nov 04;2019:6909547
pubmed: 31781197
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jul;32(7):3386-3392
pubmed: 29667042
Laryngoscope. 2016 Mar;126(3):566-9
pubmed: 26372615
Surg Endosc. 2019 Dec;33(12):3919-3925
pubmed: 30746574
Int J Med Robot. 2021 Aug;17(4):e2251
pubmed: 33686793
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Mar;5(2):127-32
pubmed: 27134840
BMC Biomed Eng. 2019 May 29;1:12
pubmed: 32903302
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Jul;28(7):906-911
pubmed: 29893626
Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Feb;102(2):261-6
pubmed: 17156149
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2020 Jun;67(6):1530-1541
pubmed: 31494541
Hum Reprod. 1998 Oct;13(1O):2748-50
pubmed: 9804224
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2019 Mar;57(3):601-614
pubmed: 30280331
Ann Biomed Eng. 2018 Oct;46(10):1663-1675
pubmed: 29948372
Surg Endosc. 2018 May;32(5):2560-2566
pubmed: 29101564
Int J Med Robot. 2018 Dec;14(6):e1941
pubmed: 29971897
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Dec 16;13(12):673-697
pubmed: 35070028
Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Dec;25(12):1333
pubmed: 34185194
Surg Endosc. 2022 Apr;36(4):2334-2340
pubmed: 33977377
BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2019 Dec 02;1(1):e000019
pubmed: 35047780
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2020 Jul;13(3):448-452
pubmed: 31692277
Ann Coloproctol. 2019 Aug;35(4):181-186
pubmed: 31487765
World J Urol. 2022 Jan;40(1):283-289
pubmed: 34424374
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004 Feb;11(1):73-8
pubmed: 15104836
Surg Endosc. 2014 Sep;28(9):2600-5
pubmed: 24671354
Investig Clin Urol. 2021 Jan;62(1):14-22
pubmed: 33381927
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2018 Apr;65(4):797-808
pubmed: 28678698
Int J Med Robot. 2017 Mar;13(1):
pubmed: 27028565
Surg Endosc. 2000 Apr;14(4):395-9
pubmed: 10790562
Surg Endosc. 2021 May;35(5):2169-2177
pubmed: 32405893
Int J Med Robot. 2006 Dec;2(4):299-304
pubmed: 17520647
Int J Med Robot. 2009 Sep;5(3):319-26
pubmed: 19455594
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008 Jun;56(6):292-4
pubmed: 18563525
Int J Artif Organs. 2009 Aug;32(8):517-27
pubmed: 19844894
Surg Endosc. 2019 Nov;33(11):3696-3703
pubmed: 30623255
Chest. 2021 Feb;159(2):845-852
pubmed: 32822675
Int J Med Robot. 2020 Feb;16(1):e2050
pubmed: 31677219
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 May;272(5):1239-44
pubmed: 24760308
Endosc Int Open. 2018 Sep;6(9):E1134-E1139
pubmed: 30211304
Int J Med Robot. 2015 Sep;11(3):331-340
pubmed: 25156175
J Vis Surg. 2017 Apr 10;3:53
pubmed: 29078616
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2013 Nov;8(6):977-87
pubmed: 23568018
Urolithiasis. 2018 Feb;46(1):69-77
pubmed: 29170856
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473
pubmed: 30178033
Comput Aided Surg. 2005 Jan;10(1):1-13
pubmed: 16199377
Surg Innov. 2018 Oct;25(5):485-491
pubmed: 29938603
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):2404-2413
pubmed: 36750488
Int J Med Robot. 2023 Apr;19(2):e2475
pubmed: 36288569
Surg Endosc. 2017 Feb;31(2):981-986
pubmed: 27369284
Int J Med Robot. 2021 Feb;17(1):1-12
pubmed: 33047863
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018 Jan/Feb;24(1):1-12
pubmed: 28914699
Updates Surg. 2021 Jun;73(3):1029-1035
pubmed: 32936390
Surg Technol Int. 2008;17:187-91
pubmed: 18802900
Int J Med Robot. 2015 Dec;11(4):418-23
pubmed: 25640259
Asian J Surg. 2022 Jan;45(1):299-306
pubmed: 34147330
Surg Endosc. 2021 Aug;35(8):4890-4899
pubmed: 34028606
J Robot Surg. 2013 Sep;7(3):227-34
pubmed: 27000918
Laryngoscope. 2013 May;123(5):1168-72
pubmed: 23494460
Surg Endosc. 1998 Dec;12(12):1415-8
pubmed: 9822469
Gastroenterology. 2006 Mar;130(3):672-7
pubmed: 16530508
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2020 Jun;35(6):1111-1115
pubmed: 32222935
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 10;12(1):2299
pubmed: 35145155
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Mar;210(3):306-13
pubmed: 20193893
Visc Med. 2018 Feb;34(1):45-51
pubmed: 29594169
Endoscopy. 2015 Sep;47(9):815-9
pubmed: 25910062
Int J Med Robot. 2020 Apr;16(2):e2078
pubmed: 31945797
Int J Med Robot. 2018 Aug;14(4):e1930
pubmed: 29869407
Int J Med Robot. 2021 Oct;17(5):e2290
pubmed: 34060214
Surg Endosc. 2000 Apr;14(4):375-81
pubmed: 10790559
Surg Endosc. 2013 Dec;27(12):4478-84
pubmed: 23892760
Surg Innov. 2007 Dec;14(4):261-4
pubmed: 18178913
Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Jun;106(6):1075-80
pubmed: 21386833
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):3232-3235
pubmed: 32394173