Firearm legislation: The association between neighboring states and crude death rates.


Journal

The journal of trauma and acute care surgery
ISSN: 2163-0763
Titre abrégé: J Trauma Acute Care Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101570622

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 07 2023
Historique:
medline: 23 6 2023
pubmed: 29 3 2023
entrez: 28 3 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Few studies have examined the impact of interstate differences in firearm laws on state-level firearm mortality. We aim to study the association between neighboring states' firearm legislation and firearm-related crude death rate (CDR). The CDC Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System was queried for adult all-intent (accidental, suicide, and homicide) firearm-related CDR among the 50 states from 2012 to 2020. States were divided into five cohorts based on the Giffords Law Center Annual Gun Law Scorecard, and two groups were constructed: Strict (A, B, C) and Lenient (D, F). We examined the effect of (1) a single incongruent neighbor, defined as "Different" if the state is bordered by ≥1 state with a grade score difference >1, and (2) the average grade of all neighboring states, defined as "Different" if the average of all neighboring states resulted in a grade score difference >1. Strict states with similar average neighbors had significantly lower CDR compared with Strict states with different average neighbors (2.98 [1.91-5.06] vs. 3.87 [2.37-5.94], p = 0.02), while Lenient states with similar average neighbors had significantly higher CDR compared with Lenient states with different average neighbors (6.02 [4.56-8.11] vs. 4.7 [3.95-5.35], p = 0.002). Lenient states surrounded by all similar Lenient states had the highest CDR, which was significantly higher than Lenient states with ≥1 different neighbor (6.52 [5.09-8.96] vs. 5.19 [3.85-6.61], p < 0.001). However, Strict states with ≥1 different neighbor did not have higher CDR compared with Strict states surrounded by all similar Strict states (3.39 [2.17-5.35] vs. 3.14 [1.91-5.38], p = 0.5). We report a lopsided neighboring effect whereby Lenient states may benefit from at least one Strict neighbor, while Strict states may be adversely affected only when surrounded by mostly Lenient neighbors. These findings may assist policymakers regarding the efficacy of their own state's legislation in the context of incongruent neighboring states. Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Few studies have examined the impact of interstate differences in firearm laws on state-level firearm mortality. We aim to study the association between neighboring states' firearm legislation and firearm-related crude death rate (CDR).
METHODS
The CDC Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System was queried for adult all-intent (accidental, suicide, and homicide) firearm-related CDR among the 50 states from 2012 to 2020. States were divided into five cohorts based on the Giffords Law Center Annual Gun Law Scorecard, and two groups were constructed: Strict (A, B, C) and Lenient (D, F). We examined the effect of (1) a single incongruent neighbor, defined as "Different" if the state is bordered by ≥1 state with a grade score difference >1, and (2) the average grade of all neighboring states, defined as "Different" if the average of all neighboring states resulted in a grade score difference >1.
RESULTS
Strict states with similar average neighbors had significantly lower CDR compared with Strict states with different average neighbors (2.98 [1.91-5.06] vs. 3.87 [2.37-5.94], p = 0.02), while Lenient states with similar average neighbors had significantly higher CDR compared with Lenient states with different average neighbors (6.02 [4.56-8.11] vs. 4.7 [3.95-5.35], p = 0.002). Lenient states surrounded by all similar Lenient states had the highest CDR, which was significantly higher than Lenient states with ≥1 different neighbor (6.52 [5.09-8.96] vs. 5.19 [3.85-6.61], p < 0.001). However, Strict states with ≥1 different neighbor did not have higher CDR compared with Strict states surrounded by all similar Strict states (3.39 [2.17-5.35] vs. 3.14 [1.91-5.38], p = 0.5).
CONCLUSION
We report a lopsided neighboring effect whereby Lenient states may benefit from at least one Strict neighbor, while Strict states may be adversely affected only when surrounded by mostly Lenient neighbors. These findings may assist policymakers regarding the efficacy of their own state's legislation in the context of incongruent neighboring states.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36973873
doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003952
pii: 01586154-202307000-00018
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

122-127

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Références

National Vital Statistics System, Mortality 1999–2020 on CDC WONDER Online Database. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. 2022. Available at: http://wonder.cdc.gov/ucd-icd10.html .
Goldstick JE, Cunningham RM, Carter PM. Current causes of death in children and adolescents in the United States. N Engl J Med . 2022;386(20):1955–1956.
Kalesan B, Mobily ME, Keiser O, Fagan JA, Galea S. Firearm legislation and firearm mortality in the USA: a cross-sectional, state-level study. Lancet . 2016;387(10030):1847–1855.
Sen B, Panjamapirom A. State background checks for gun purchase and firearm deaths: an exploratory study. Prev Med . 2012;55(4):346–350.
Alban RF, Nuño M, Ko A, Barmparas G, Lewis AV, Margulies DR. Weaker gun state laws are associated with higher rates of suicide secondary to firearms. J Surg Res . 2018;221:135–142.
Siegel M, Pahn M, Xuan Z, Fleegler E, Hemenway D. The impact of state firearm laws on homicide and suicide deaths in the USA, 1991–2016: a panel study. J Gen Intern Med . 2019;34(10):2021–2028.
Knight B. State gun policy and cross-state externalities: evidence from crime gun tracing. American economic journal Economic policy . 2013;5(4):200–229.
Wright MA, Wintemute GJ, Webster DW. Factors affecting a recently purchased handgun's risk for use in crime under circumstances that suggest gun trafficking. J Urban Health . 2010;87(3):352–364.
Kaufman EJ, Morrison CN, Branas CC, Wiebe DJ. State firearm laws and interstate firearm deaths from homicide and suicide in the United States: a cross-sectional analysis of data by county. JAMA Intern Med . 2018;178(5):692–700.
Matthay EC, Galin J, Rudolph KE, Farkas K, Wintemute GJ, Ahern J. In-state and interstate associations between gun shows and firearm deaths and injuries. Ann Intern Med . 2017;167(12):837–844.
Fleegler EW, Lee LK, Monuteaux MC, Hemenway D, Mannix R. Firearm legislation and firearm-related fatalities in the United States. JAMA Intern Med . 2013;173(9):732–740.
Sumner SA, Layde PM, Guse CE. Firearm death rates and association with level of firearm purchase background check. Am J Prev Med . 2008;35(1):1–6.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Injury Prevention and Control. Welcome to WISQARS. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/ . Accessed September 4, 2022.
Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence. 2019 Gun Law State Scorecard 2019. Available at: https://giffords.org/lawcenter/resources/scorecard2019/ . Accessed September 4, 2022.
Gunn JF, Boxer P, Andrews T, Ostermann M, Bonne SL, Gusmano M, et al. The impact of firearm legislation on firearm deaths, 1991–2017. J Public Health (Oxf) . 2022;44(3):614–624.
Smart R, Morral AR, Smucker S, Cherney S, Schell TL, Peterson S, et al. The Science of Gun Policy: A Critical Synthesis of Research Evidence on the Effects of Gun Policies in the United States . 2nd ed. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 2020.
Kappelman J, Fording RC. The effect of state gun laws on youth suicide by firearm: 1981–2017. Suicide Life Threat Behav . 2021;51(2):368–377.
Zeoli AM, Goldstick J, Mauri A, Wallin M, Goyal M, Cunningham R. The association of firearm laws with firearm outcomes among children and adolescents: a scoping review. J Behav Med . 2019;42(4):741–762.
Chammas M, Byerly S, Lynde J, Mantero A, Saberi R, Gilna G, et al. Association between child access prevention and state firearm laws with pediatric firearm-related deaths. J Surg Res . 2023;281:223–227.
Liu Y, Siegel M, Sen B. Neighbors do matter: between-state firearm laws and state firearm-related deaths in the U.S., 2000–2017. Am J Prev Med . 2020;59(5):648–657.
Webster DW, Vernick JS, Hepburn LM. Relationship between licensing, registration, and other gun sales laws and the source state of crime guns. Inj Prev . 2001;7(3):184–189.

Auteurs

Majid Chammas (M)

From Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine/Jackson Memorial Hospital (M.C., G.D.P., J.P.M., I.A.R., R.R., N.N.), Miami, FL; Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Biostatistics, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine (H.K.), Miami, FL; Department of Surgery, Division of Acute Care Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine (M.C.), Jacksonville, FL; and Division of Emergency General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado/Denver Health (D.D.Y.), Denver, CO.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH