Association of Masticatory Efficiency and Reduced Number of Antagonistic Contacts Due to Extraction, Changing Dentition or Malocclusion in Children.

dental occlusion malocclusion mastication particle size tooth extraction

Journal

Dentistry journal
ISSN: 2304-6767
Titre abrégé: Dent J (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101716125

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Feb 2023
Historique:
received: 07 02 2023
revised: 17 02 2023
accepted: 23 02 2023
medline: 29 3 2023
entrez: 28 3 2023
pubmed: 29 3 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Tooth extraction, changing dentition and malocclusion can decrease area of occlusal contact and negatively affect masticatory efficiency. Aim of this study was to evaluate difference in masticatory efficiency in association with previously named factors. In this cross-sectional study masticatory efficiency parameters (number of particles, mean diameter and mean surface of particles) determined with optical scanning method were compared between children with healthy dentition (12 girls, 12 boys, age 3 to 14) and children with lost antagonistic contacts due to tooth extraction, changing dentition and malocclusions (12 girls, 12 boys, age 3 to 14). Number of chewed particles is significantly higher in a group of children with healthy dentition ( Children with lost antagonistic contacts have an impaired masticatory efficiency in comparison to children with complete dentition, but there is no difference regarding the aetiology of contact loss.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Tooth extraction, changing dentition and malocclusion can decrease area of occlusal contact and negatively affect masticatory efficiency. Aim of this study was to evaluate difference in masticatory efficiency in association with previously named factors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS METHODS
In this cross-sectional study masticatory efficiency parameters (number of particles, mean diameter and mean surface of particles) determined with optical scanning method were compared between children with healthy dentition (12 girls, 12 boys, age 3 to 14) and children with lost antagonistic contacts due to tooth extraction, changing dentition and malocclusions (12 girls, 12 boys, age 3 to 14).
RESULTS RESULTS
Number of chewed particles is significantly higher in a group of children with healthy dentition (
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Children with lost antagonistic contacts have an impaired masticatory efficiency in comparison to children with complete dentition, but there is no difference regarding the aetiology of contact loss.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36975561
pii: dj11030064
doi: 10.3390/dj11030064
pmc: PMC10047579
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

J Can Dent Assoc. 1994 May;60(5):443-6, 449
pubmed: 8004522
Spec Care Dentist. 1993 May-Jun;13(3):102-6
pubmed: 8153849
J Dent. 1990 Aug;18(4):185-9
pubmed: 2212200
J Texture Stud. 2019 Jun;50(3):194-216
pubmed: 30365162
Physiol Behav. 2018 Oct 1;194:456-465
pubmed: 29960013
J Oral Rehabil. 2012 May;39(5):338-48
pubmed: 22220913
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21167
pubmed: 21738616
J Oral Rehabil. 2003 Jul;30(7):720-2
pubmed: 12791158
Pediatr Dent. 2001 Nov-Dec;23(6):499-505
pubmed: 11800451
J Oral Rehabil. 1995 Jul;22(7):469-80
pubmed: 7562211
J Oral Rehabil. 2011 Oct;38(10):754-80
pubmed: 21241351
Spec Care Dentist. 1998 Jan-Feb;18(1):33-9
pubmed: 9791305
Physiol Behav. 2006 Aug 30;89(1):28-35
pubmed: 16581096
J Dent. 2012 Aug;40(8):639-43
pubmed: 22521703
Arch Oral Biol. 2013 Mar;58(3):286-92
pubmed: 22939374
J Am Dent Assoc. 1998 Sep;129(9):1261-9
pubmed: 9766107
Braz Oral Res. 2007 Apr-Jun;21(2):146-52
pubmed: 17589650
J Oral Rehabil. 1995 Feb;22(2):153-8
pubmed: 7722747
J Texture Stud. 2017 Aug;48(4):271-279
pubmed: 28766752
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jan;21(1):159-166
pubmed: 26925583
Physiol Behav. 2018 May 1;188:239-250
pubmed: 29452151
J Dent. 2013 May;41(5):443-8
pubmed: 23438416
J Dent Res. 1994 Nov;73(11):1677-83
pubmed: 7983253
Br J Nutr. 2014 Feb;111(3):403-14
pubmed: 24063732
Monogr Oral Sci. 2020;28:134-147
pubmed: 31940641
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1999 Aug;27(4):249-58
pubmed: 10403084
J Prosthet Dent. 1983 Mar;49(3):427-33
pubmed: 6573489
Adv Med Sci. 2006;51 Suppl 1:196-9
pubmed: 17458090
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2003 Oct;31(5):328-34
pubmed: 14667003
Front Physiol. 2020 Apr 03;11:263
pubmed: 32317982
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2017 Jun;18(2):116-120
pubmed: 28598182
J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Jun;87(6):667-73
pubmed: 12131890
Korean J Orthod. 2017 May;47(3):151-157
pubmed: 28523241
Eur J Oral Sci. 2009 Oct;117(5):580-6
pubmed: 19758256
Gerodontology. 2014 Sep;31(3):166-77
pubmed: 23170948

Auteurs

Odri Cicvaric (O)

Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia.

Renata Grzic (R)

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia.

Marija Simunovic Erpusina (M)

Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia.

Suncana Simonic-Kocijan (S)

Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia.

Danko Bakarcic (D)

Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia.

Natasa Ivancic Jokic (N)

Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, University of Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia.

Classifications MeSH