Harmonization of Newborn Screening Results for Pompe Disease and Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I.

MPS I digital microfluidics harmonization multiples of the median newborn screening pompe regression tandem mass spectrometry

Journal

International journal of neonatal screening
ISSN: 2409-515X
Titre abrégé: Int J Neonatal Screen
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101665400

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Feb 2023
Historique:
received: 30 01 2023
revised: 14 02 2023
accepted: 16 02 2023
medline: 29 3 2023
entrez: 28 3 2023
pubmed: 29 3 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In newborn screening, false-negative results can be disastrous, leading to disability and death, while false-positive results contribute to parental anxiety and unnecessary follow-ups. Cutoffs are set conservatively to prevent missed cases for Pompe and MPS I, resulting in increased falsepositive results and lower positive predictive values. Harmonization has been proposed as a way to minimize false-negative and false-positive results and correct for method differences, so we harmonized enzyme activities for Pompe and MPS I across laboratories and testing methods (Tandem Mass Spectrometry (MS/MS) or Digital Microfluidics (DMF)). Participating states analyzed proofof- concept calibrators, blanks, and contrived specimens and reported enzyme activities, cutoffs, and other testing parameters to Tennessee. Regression and multiples of the median were used to harmonize the data. We observed varied cutoffs and results. Six of seven MS/MS labs reported enzyme activities for one specimen for MPS I marginally above their respective cutoffs with results classified as negative, whereas all DMF labs reported this specimen's enzyme activity below their respective cutoffs with results classified as positive. Reasonable agreement in enzyme activities and cutoffs was achieved with harmonization; however, harmonization does not change how a value would be reported as this is dependent on the placement of cutoffs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36975849
pii: ijns9010011
doi: 10.3390/ijns9010011
pmc: PMC10059896
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : CDC HHS
ID : CDC-RFA-EH18-1804
Pays : United States

Références

J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2012 Nov 1;908:9-17
pubmed: 23122395
Genet Med. 2018 Aug;20(8):840-846
pubmed: 29095812
Clin Chem. 2015 Nov;61(11):1363-71
pubmed: 26369786
Mol Genet Metab. 2016 Aug;118(4):304-9
pubmed: 27238910
J Genet Couns. 2016 Apr;25(2):373-84
pubmed: 26315880
Clin Chem. 2011 Oct;57(10):1444-51
pubmed: 21859904
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013 Apr;51(4):741-51
pubmed: 23435100
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2020 Jun;6(2):
pubmed: 32352041
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Nov 26;58(12):2063-2072
pubmed: 32432561
J Pediatr. 2015 Jan;166(1):172-7
pubmed: 25444528
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2021 Jul 12;7(3):
pubmed: 34287245
Ital J Pediatr. 2018 Nov 16;44(Suppl 2):126
pubmed: 30442156
Genet Med. 2019 Mar;21(3):631-640
pubmed: 30093709
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2020 Sep 17;6(3):75
pubmed: 33123642
N C Med J. 2019 Jan-Feb;80(1):54-58
pubmed: 30622208
J Inherit Metab Dis. 2019 Jan;42(1):128-139
pubmed: 30740731
Clin Chem. 2017 Jul;63(7):1271-1277
pubmed: 28450385
Genet Med. 2012 Jan;14(1):76-80
pubmed: 22237434
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2020 Mar;6(1):
pubmed: 32064362
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2019 Jun;5(2):
pubmed: 31328175
Genet Med. 2018 Aug;20(8):847-854
pubmed: 29120458
Am J Med Genet A. 2021 Jan;185(1):134-140
pubmed: 33098355
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2020 Nov 02;6(4):
pubmed: 33147872
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2020 Oct 08;6(4):
pubmed: 33124616
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2018 Sep;4(3):
pubmed: 30882045
Clin Chem. 2009 Jan;55(1):158-64
pubmed: 18988750
Birth Defects Res. 2020 Mar 1;112(4):350-366
pubmed: 32115905
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2019 Mar;5(1):
pubmed: 30957052
Acta Paediatr. 2018 Dec;107(12):2059-2065
pubmed: 30242902
J Law Med Ethics. 2016 Jun;44(2):231-40
pubmed: 27338599
Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 May 11;10(5):
pubmed: 32403245
Int J Neonatal Screen. 2019 Jun 21;5(2):24
pubmed: 33072983
Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2011;17(1):9-14
pubmed: 22447749

Auteurs

M Christine Dorley (MC)

Tennessee Department of Health, Division of Laboratory Services, Nashville, TN 37243, USA.
College of Health Sciences & Public Policy, Walden University, Minneapolis, MN 55401, USA.

George J Dizikes (GJ)

Tennessee Department of Health, Division of Laboratory Services, Knoxville, TN 37920, USA.

Charles Austin Pickens (CA)

Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.

Carla Cuthbert (C)

Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.

Khaja Basheeruddin (K)

Illinois Department of Public Health, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.

Fizza Gulamali-Majid (F)

Maryland Department of Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

Paul Hetterich (P)

Virginia Department of General Services, Division of Consolidated Laboratory Services, Richmond, VA 23219, USA.

Amy Hietala (A)

Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, MN 55155, USA.

Ashley Kelsey (A)

Michigan Department of Health & Human Services, Lansing, MI 48906, USA.

Tracy Klug (T)

Missouri State Public Health Laboratory, Jefferson City, MO 65101, USA.

Barbara Lesko (B)

Department of Pathology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.

Michelle Mills (M)

Kansas Health and Environmental Laboratories, Topeka, KS 66620, USA.

Shawn Moloney (S)

Michigan Department of Health & Human Services, Lansing, MI 48906, USA.

Partha Neogi (P)

California Department of Public Health, Richmond, CA 94804, USA.

Joseph Orsini (J)

Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY 12208, USA.

Douglas Singer (D)

Ohio Department of Health, Reynoldsburg, OH 43068, USA.

Konstantinos Petritis (K)

Division of Laboratory Sciences, National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA.

Classifications MeSH