Long-Term Degradation Assessment of a Polyurethane-Based Surgical Adhesive-Assessment and Critical Consideration of Preclinical In Vitro and In Vivo Testing.

animal implantation model biodegradable surgical sealant biomaterial degradation long-term biocompatibility polyurethane adhesive

Journal

Journal of functional biomaterials
ISSN: 2079-4983
Titre abrégé: J Funct Biomater
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101570734

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Mar 2023
Historique:
received: 15 02 2023
revised: 08 03 2023
accepted: 18 03 2023
medline: 29 3 2023
entrez: 28 3 2023
pubmed: 29 3 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Tissue adhesives constitute a great possibility to improve conventional wound closure. In contrast to sutures, they enable nearly immediate hemostasis and can prevent fluid or air leaks. In the present study, a poly(ester)urethane-based adhesive was investigated which already proved to be suitable for different indications, such as reinforcing vascular anastomosis and sealing liver tissue. Using in vitro and in vivo setups, the degradation of the adhesives was monitored over a period of up to 2 years, to evaluate long-term biocompatibility and determine degradation kinetics. For the first time, the complete degradation of the adhesive was documented. In subcutaneous locations, tissue residues were found after 12 months and in intramuscular locations, tissue degradation was complete after about 6 months. A detailed histological evaluation of the local tissue reaction revealed good biocompatibility throughout the different degradation stages. After full degradation, complete remodeling to physiological tissue was observed at the implant locations. In addition, this study critically discusses common issues related to the assessment of biomaterial degradation kinetics in the context of medical device certification. This work highlighted the importance and encouraged the implementation of biologically relevant in vitro degradation models to replace animal studies or at least reduce the number of animals in preclinical testing prior to clinical studies. Moreover, the suitability of frequently used implantation studies based on ISO 10993-6 at standard locations was critically discussed, especially in light of the associated lack of reliable predictions for degradation kinetics at the clinically relevant site of implantation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36976092
pii: jfb14030168
doi: 10.3390/jfb14030168
pmc: PMC10058192
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Adhesys Medical GmbH

Références

Eur Surg Res. 2018;59(1-2):48-57
pubmed: 29462813
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2016 Apr;104(3):626-39
pubmed: 25891348
Biomaterials. 2005 Dec;26(35):7457-70
pubmed: 16024077
J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 1994;6(5):435-46
pubmed: 7841150
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2017 Mar;105(3):927-940
pubmed: 27813288
Lab Anim. 2020 Jun;54(3):251-260
pubmed: 31480934
Bioact Mater. 2020 Oct 15;6(4):1083-1106
pubmed: 33102948
Materials (Basel). 2015 Aug 28;8(9):5671-5701
pubmed: 28793529
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1250:109-124
pubmed: 32601941
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2015 Nov;103(11):3666-75
pubmed: 25904301
J Invest Surg. 2022 Jan;35(1):233-239
pubmed: 33535001
World J Hepatol. 2017 Aug 28;9(24):1030-1039
pubmed: 28932349
Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2014;42(3-4):271-92
pubmed: 25597240
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2022 Aug;110(8):1922-1931
pubmed: 35293688
Surg Innov. 2017 Oct;24(5):423-431
pubmed: 28715950
Biomaterials. 2011 Sep;32(26):6034-44
pubmed: 21641638
Nano Today. 2021 Feb;36:
pubmed: 33425002
Biomacromolecules. 2017 Oct 9;18(10):3009-3039
pubmed: 28862846
Biomaterials. 2000 Dec;21(23):2335-46
pubmed: 11055281
Eur Surg Res. 2021;62(4):255-261
pubmed: 34289469
Ann Anat. 2021 Nov;238:151782
pubmed: 34144156
Acta Biomater. 2008 Jul;4(4):783-90
pubmed: 18348913
Biomed Mater. 2006 Mar;1(1):R1-9
pubmed: 18458376
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 30;11(1):13598
pubmed: 34193930
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006 Feb;76(2):377-85
pubmed: 16270347

Auteurs

Lisanne Bremer (L)

Department of Biohybrid & Medical Textiles, Institute of Applied Medical Engineering, Helmholtz Institute for Biomedical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany.

Kerstin Hagemeister (K)

Adhesys Medical GmbH, 52078 Aachen, Germany.

Michaela Moss (M)

Institute for Laboratory Animal Science & Experimental Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany.

Lisa Ernst (L)

Institute for Laboratory Animal Science & Experimental Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany.

René H Tolba (RH)

Institute for Laboratory Animal Science & Experimental Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, 52074 Aachen, Germany.

Stefan Jockenhoevel (S)

Department of Biohybrid & Medical Textiles, Institute of Applied Medical Engineering, Helmholtz Institute for Biomedical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany.

Christian Apel (C)

Department of Biohybrid & Medical Textiles, Institute of Applied Medical Engineering, Helmholtz Institute for Biomedical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany.

Classifications MeSH