MyGood Trip, a Telemedicine Intervention for Physical Activity Recovery After Bariatric Surgery: Randomized Controlled Trial.

RCT bariatric surgery connected pedometer eHealth gastric bypass mixed methods research physical activity sleeve gastrectomy telemedicine

Journal

JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Mar 2023
Historique:
received: 27 11 2020
accepted: 25 01 2023
revised: 19 10 2021
medline: 29 3 2023
entrez: 28 3 2023
pubmed: 29 3 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Despite bariatric surgery showing significant weight loss trajectories for many patients, a substantial proportion regain weight after the first year following surgery. The addition of telemedicine to standard care could support patients with engaging in a more active lifestyle and thus improve clinical outcomes. Our aim was to evaluate a telemedicine intervention program dedicated to the promotion of physical activity including digital devices, teleconsultation, and telemonitoring the first 6 months following bariatric surgery. This study employed a mixed methods design based on an open-label randomized controlled trial. Patients were included during the first week after bariatric surgery; then, they were randomized into 2 intervention groups: The TelePhys group received a monthly telemedicine consultation focusing on physical activity coaching, while the TeleDiet group received a monthly telemedicine consultation involving diet coaching. Data were collected using a watch pedometer and body weight scale, both of which were connected wirelessly. The primary outcome was the difference between the 2 groups in the mean numbers of steps at the first and sixth postoperative months. Weight change was also evaluated, and focus groups and interviews were conducted to enrich the results and capture perceptions of the telemedicine provided. Among the 90 patients (mean age 40.6, SD 10.4 years; 73/90, 81% women; 62/90, 69% gastric bypass), 70 completed the study until the sixth month (n=38 TelePhys; n=32 TeleDiet), and 18 participants agreed to be interviewed (n=8 Telephys; n=10 TeleDiet). An increase in the mean number of steps between the first and sixth months was found in both groups, but this change was significant only in the TeleDiet group (P=.01). No difference was found when comparing both intervention groups. Interviewed participants reported having appreciated the teleconsultations, as the individualized tailored counseling helped them to make better choices about behaviors that could increase their likelihood of a daily life in better health. Weight loss followed by social factors (such as social support) were identified as the main facilitators to physical activity. Family responsibilities, professional constraints as well as poor urban policies promoting physical activity, and lack of accessibility to sport infrastructure were their major barriers to postoperative lifestyle adherence. Our study did not show any difference in mobility recovery after bariatric surgery related to a telemedicine intervention dedicated to physical activity. The early postoperative timing for our intervention may explain the null findings. eHealth interventions aiming to change behaviors and carried out by clinicians require support from structured public health policies that tackle patients' obesogenic environment in order to be efficient in their struggle against sedentary lifestyle-related pathologies. Further research will need to focus on long-term interventions. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02716480, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02716480.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Despite bariatric surgery showing significant weight loss trajectories for many patients, a substantial proportion regain weight after the first year following surgery. The addition of telemedicine to standard care could support patients with engaging in a more active lifestyle and thus improve clinical outcomes.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
Our aim was to evaluate a telemedicine intervention program dedicated to the promotion of physical activity including digital devices, teleconsultation, and telemonitoring the first 6 months following bariatric surgery.
METHODS METHODS
This study employed a mixed methods design based on an open-label randomized controlled trial. Patients were included during the first week after bariatric surgery; then, they were randomized into 2 intervention groups: The TelePhys group received a monthly telemedicine consultation focusing on physical activity coaching, while the TeleDiet group received a monthly telemedicine consultation involving diet coaching. Data were collected using a watch pedometer and body weight scale, both of which were connected wirelessly. The primary outcome was the difference between the 2 groups in the mean numbers of steps at the first and sixth postoperative months. Weight change was also evaluated, and focus groups and interviews were conducted to enrich the results and capture perceptions of the telemedicine provided.
RESULTS RESULTS
Among the 90 patients (mean age 40.6, SD 10.4 years; 73/90, 81% women; 62/90, 69% gastric bypass), 70 completed the study until the sixth month (n=38 TelePhys; n=32 TeleDiet), and 18 participants agreed to be interviewed (n=8 Telephys; n=10 TeleDiet). An increase in the mean number of steps between the first and sixth months was found in both groups, but this change was significant only in the TeleDiet group (P=.01). No difference was found when comparing both intervention groups. Interviewed participants reported having appreciated the teleconsultations, as the individualized tailored counseling helped them to make better choices about behaviors that could increase their likelihood of a daily life in better health. Weight loss followed by social factors (such as social support) were identified as the main facilitators to physical activity. Family responsibilities, professional constraints as well as poor urban policies promoting physical activity, and lack of accessibility to sport infrastructure were their major barriers to postoperative lifestyle adherence.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Our study did not show any difference in mobility recovery after bariatric surgery related to a telemedicine intervention dedicated to physical activity. The early postoperative timing for our intervention may explain the null findings. eHealth interventions aiming to change behaviors and carried out by clinicians require support from structured public health policies that tackle patients' obesogenic environment in order to be efficient in their struggle against sedentary lifestyle-related pathologies. Further research will need to focus on long-term interventions.
TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02716480, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02716480.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36976624
pii: v7i1e26077
doi: 10.2196/26077
pmc: PMC10132008
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02716480']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e26077

Informations de copyright

©Katia Lurbe i Puerto, Matthieu Bruzzi, Claire Rives-Lange, Tigran Poghosyan, Marion Bretault, Gilles Chatellier, Aurelie Vilfaillot, Jean-Marc Chevallier, Sebastien Czernichow, Claire Carette. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 28.03.2023.

Références

BMC Public Health. 2013 Dec 17;13:1194
pubmed: 24341761
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 15;383(16):1535-1543
pubmed: 33053284
Obes Res Clin Pract. 2012 Jan-Mar;6(1):e1-e90
pubmed: 24331170
Am J Health Promot. 2016 Sep;30(7):536-44
pubmed: 26559717
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Dec 1;8(12):e19237
pubmed: 33258787
Obes Surg. 2020 Mar;30(3):1118-1125
pubmed: 31912467
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 Jan-Feb;11(1):169-77
pubmed: 25304832
Obes Surg. 2017 Mar;27(3):586-598
pubmed: 27586525
J Telemed Telecare. 2018 Dec;24(10):651-660
pubmed: 30343656
J Telemed Telecare. 2017 Jun;23(5):529-535
pubmed: 27279467
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007 Nov-Dec;3(6):627-30; discussion 630
pubmed: 17950045
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2011 Sep-Oct;7(5):644-51
pubmed: 21962227
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 25;9(3):e92829
pubmed: 24667343
CMAJ. 2006 Mar 14;174(6):801-9
pubmed: 16534088
Obes Res Clin Pract. 2019 Mar - Apr;13(2):176-179
pubmed: 30826256
Obes Surg. 2021 Jul;31(7):3015-3025
pubmed: 33712935
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 May-Jun;10(3):524-30
pubmed: 24462340
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Jun;12(5):1072-1079
pubmed: 27246138
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015 Nov-Dec;11(6):1349-60
pubmed: 26421929
Obes Rev. 2021 Jul;22 Suppl 4:e13296
pubmed: 34080281
Trials. 2016 Mar 01;17(1):114
pubmed: 26927479
Obes Surg. 2016 Mar;26(3):649-59
pubmed: 26738895
Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Jan;91(1):106-14
pubmed: 19889820
Bariatr Surg Pract Patient Care. 2013 Jun;8(2):61-68
pubmed: 24761367
Interact J Med Res. 2014 Feb 06;3(1):e4
pubmed: 24509408
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2019 Dec;14(1):1612704
pubmed: 31072238
Obes Rev. 2015 May;16(5):376-92
pubmed: 25753009
JAMA. 2020 Sep 1;324(9):879-887
pubmed: 32870301
Mhealth. 2019 Feb 25;5:6
pubmed: 30976598
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jan 19;376(3):254-266
pubmed: 28099824
Digit Health. 2020 Jan 07;6:2055207619898987
pubmed: 32030193
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016 Aug;24(8):1660-8
pubmed: 27367821
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2015 Nov;23(6):470-8
pubmed: 26331982
Diabetes Care. 1999 Apr;22(4):623-34
pubmed: 10189543
J Mix Methods Res. 2010 Sep 20;4(4):342-360
pubmed: 22167325
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Feb;151:241-9
pubmed: 26820572
Obes Surg. 2015 Oct;25(10):1875-81
pubmed: 25702141
Obes Surg. 2017 Jan;27(1):51-58
pubmed: 27229736

Auteurs

Katia Lurbe I Puerto (K)

Service de Nutrition, Centre Spécialisé Obésité, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.

Matthieu Bruzzi (M)

Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.

Claire Rives-Lange (C)

Service de Nutrition, Centre Spécialisé Obésité, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Université de Paris, Paris, France.
METHODS team, Epidemiology and Biostatistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Center, INSERM 1153, Paris, France.

Tigran Poghosyan (T)

Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Université de Paris, Paris, France.

Marion Bretault (M)

Service de Nutrition, Centre Spécialisé Obésité, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Boulogne-Billancour, France.

Gilles Chatellier (G)

Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Unité de recherche clinique, Hôpital européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.

Aurelie Vilfaillot (A)

Unité de recherche clinique, Hôpital européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.

Jean-Marc Chevallier (JM)

Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Université de Paris, Paris, France.

Sebastien Czernichow (S)

Service de Nutrition, Centre Spécialisé Obésité, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Université de Paris, Paris, France.
METHODS team, Epidemiology and Biostatistics Sorbonne Paris Cité Center, INSERM 1153, Paris, France.

Claire Carette (C)

Service de Nutrition, Centre Spécialisé Obésité, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Centre d'investigation clinique, INSERM 1418, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.

Classifications MeSH