A Systematic Review of Dynamic, Kinematic, and Muscle Activity during Gymnastic Still Rings Elements.

biomechanics exercise technique men’s artistic gymnastics strength training load

Journal

Sports (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4663
Titre abrégé: Sports (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101722684

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Feb 2023
Historique:
received: 19 12 2022
revised: 17 02 2023
accepted: 20 02 2023
medline: 29 3 2023
entrez: 28 3 2023
pubmed: 29 3 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Still rings are a unique gymnastics apparatus allowing for a combination of dynamic and static elements in a specific technique. This review aimed to compile the dynamic, kinematic, and EMG characteristics of swing, dismount, handstand, strength, and hold elements on still rings. This systematic review was conducted in concordance with PRISMA in PubMed, EBSCOhost, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. In total, 37 studies were included, describing the strength and hold elements, the kip and swing elements, swing through or to handstand, and dismounts. The current evidence suggests that the execution of gymnastics elements on still rings and training drills requires a high training load. Specific preconditioning exercises could be used to train for the Swallow, iron cross, and support scale. Negative impacts of load during hold elements can be reduced by special support devices such as the Herdos or support belts. Another aspect is improving strength prerequisites by exercises such as bench presses, barbell exercises, and support belts, where the main focus should be on muscular coordination similar to the other considerable elements. Electromyography is an appropriate tool for the investigation of muscular coordination and force platforms for assessing a sufficient strength level to successfully perform elements on still rings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36976936
pii: sports11030050
doi: 10.3390/sports11030050
pmc: PMC10059656
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Références

J Biomech. 2003 Apr;36(4):545-52
pubmed: 12600345
Sports Med. 1992 May;13(5):337-56
pubmed: 1565928
Sports Biomech. 2023 Feb;22(2):186-194
pubmed: 35000554
Pediatr Radiol. 2009 Dec;39(12):1299-306
pubmed: 19847411
J Strength Cond Res. 2006 Feb;20(1):53-7
pubmed: 16503691
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2022 Mar 11;7(1):
pubmed: 35323611
BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2535
pubmed: 19622551
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2004 Sep;44(3):240-5
pubmed: 15756161
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Jun;33(6):1609-1618
pubmed: 28700510
Sports Health. 2015 Mar;7(2):161-5
pubmed: 25984262
Percept Mot Skills. 2011 Feb;112(1):109-21
pubmed: 21466084
Sports (Basel). 2021 May 28;9(6):
pubmed: 34071632
J Sports Sci Med. 2007 Mar 01;6(1):93-7
pubmed: 24149230
Curr Sports Med Rep. 2018 Nov;17(11):366-375
pubmed: 30407945
Sports (Basel). 2022 Mar 28;10(4):
pubmed: 35447859
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 18;16(22):
pubmed: 31752246
J Biomech. 1998 Jan;31(1):27-35
pubmed: 9596535
J Strength Cond Res. 2009 Nov;23(8):2381-8
pubmed: 19826284
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2019 Feb;59(2):330-334
pubmed: 29327826

Auteurs

Roman Malíř (R)

Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic.

Jan Chrudimský (J)

Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic.

Michal Šteffl (M)

Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic.

Petr Stastny (P)

Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, Charles University, 162 52 Prague, Czech Republic.

Classifications MeSH