Testing the stress gradient hypothesis in soil bacterial communities associated with vegetation belts in the Andean Atacama Desert.
Bacteria
Co-occurrence networks
Plant community
Soil microbiota
Vegetation belts
Journal
Environmental microbiome
ISSN: 2524-6372
Titre abrégé: Environ Microbiome
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101768168
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Mar 2023
28 Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
15
11
2022
accepted:
20
03
2023
medline:
29
3
2023
entrez:
28
3
2023
pubmed:
29
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Soil microorganisms are in constant interaction with plants, and these interactions shape the composition of soil bacterial communities by modifying their environment. However, little is known about the relationship between microorganisms and native plants present in extreme environments that are not affected by human intervention. Using high-throughput sequencing in combination with random forest and co-occurrence network analyses, we compared soil bacterial communities inhabiting the rhizosphere surrounding soil (RSS) and the corresponding bulk soil (BS) of 21 native plant species organized into three vegetation belts along the altitudinal gradient (2400-4500 m a.s.l.) of the Talabre-Lejía transect (TLT) in the slopes of the Andes in the Atacama Desert. We assessed how each plant community influenced the taxa, potential functions, and ecological interactions of the soil bacterial communities in this extreme natural ecosystem. We tested the ability of the stress gradient hypothesis, which predicts that positive species interactions become increasingly important as stressful conditions increase, to explain the interactions among members of TLT soil microbial communities. Our comparison of RSS and BS compartments along the TLT provided evidence of plant-specific microbial community composition in the RSS and showed that bacterial communities modify their ecological interactions, in particular, their positive:negative connection ratios in the presence of plant roots at each vegetation belt. We also identified the taxa driving the transition of the BS to the RSS, which appear to be indicators of key host-microbial relationships in the rhizosphere of plants in response to different abiotic conditions. Finally, the potential functions of the bacterial communities also diverge between the BS and the RSS compartments, particularly in the extreme and harshest belts of the TLT. In this study, we identified taxa of bacterial communities that establish species-specific relationships with native plants and showed that over a gradient of changing abiotic conditions, these relationships may also be plant community specific. These findings also reveal that the interactions among members of the soil microbial communities do not support the stress gradient hypothesis. However, through the RSS compartment, each plant community appears to moderate the abiotic stress gradient and increase the efficiency of the soil microbial community, suggesting that positive interactions may be context dependent.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Soil microorganisms are in constant interaction with plants, and these interactions shape the composition of soil bacterial communities by modifying their environment. However, little is known about the relationship between microorganisms and native plants present in extreme environments that are not affected by human intervention. Using high-throughput sequencing in combination with random forest and co-occurrence network analyses, we compared soil bacterial communities inhabiting the rhizosphere surrounding soil (RSS) and the corresponding bulk soil (BS) of 21 native plant species organized into three vegetation belts along the altitudinal gradient (2400-4500 m a.s.l.) of the Talabre-Lejía transect (TLT) in the slopes of the Andes in the Atacama Desert. We assessed how each plant community influenced the taxa, potential functions, and ecological interactions of the soil bacterial communities in this extreme natural ecosystem. We tested the ability of the stress gradient hypothesis, which predicts that positive species interactions become increasingly important as stressful conditions increase, to explain the interactions among members of TLT soil microbial communities.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Our comparison of RSS and BS compartments along the TLT provided evidence of plant-specific microbial community composition in the RSS and showed that bacterial communities modify their ecological interactions, in particular, their positive:negative connection ratios in the presence of plant roots at each vegetation belt. We also identified the taxa driving the transition of the BS to the RSS, which appear to be indicators of key host-microbial relationships in the rhizosphere of plants in response to different abiotic conditions. Finally, the potential functions of the bacterial communities also diverge between the BS and the RSS compartments, particularly in the extreme and harshest belts of the TLT.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
In this study, we identified taxa of bacterial communities that establish species-specific relationships with native plants and showed that over a gradient of changing abiotic conditions, these relationships may also be plant community specific. These findings also reveal that the interactions among members of the soil microbial communities do not support the stress gradient hypothesis. However, through the RSS compartment, each plant community appears to moderate the abiotic stress gradient and increase the efficiency of the soil microbial community, suggesting that positive interactions may be context dependent.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36978149
doi: 10.1186/s40793-023-00486-w
pii: 10.1186/s40793-023-00486-w
pmc: PMC10052861
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
24Subventions
Organisme : Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
ID : 11200319
Organisme : Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
ID : 3190194
Organisme : Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
ID : Ph.D. Fellowship 21210808
Organisme : Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
ID : FB21006
Organisme : Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
ID : ANID-MILENIO-CN2021-044
Organisme : Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo
ID : 1201278
Organisme : Severo Ochoa Program
ID : Postdoctoral contract
Organisme : NLHPC (ECM-02)
ID : Powered@NLHPC
Organisme : Agencia Estatal de Investigación of Spain
ID : SEV-2016-0672 (2017-2021)
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Microorganisms. 2021 Feb 11;9(2):
pubmed: 33670245
mSystems. 2017 May 30;2(3):
pubmed: 28593197
Nature. 2017 Nov 23;551(7681):457-463
pubmed: 29088705
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016 Dec 15;83(1):
pubmed: 27793827
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 10;9(11):e112609
pubmed: 25383887
New Phytol. 2022 Jun;234(6):1987-2002
pubmed: 35211983
Bioinformatics. 2011 Aug 15;27(16):2194-200
pubmed: 21700674
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 23;11(1):8878
pubmed: 33893339
Bioinformatics. 2007 Jan 15;23(2):259-61
pubmed: 17018536
New Phytol. 2022 Jun;234(6):2126-2139
pubmed: 35274744
Plant Physiol. 2009 Dec;151(4):2006-17
pubmed: 19854857
Plant Cell Environ. 2009 Jun;32(6):666-81
pubmed: 19143988
Nat Ecol Evol. 2020 Jan;4(1):40-45
pubmed: 31844189
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Sep 15;839:156086
pubmed: 35605870
Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 09;6:22226
pubmed: 26956399
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Dec;75(23):7537-41
pubmed: 19801464
Extremophiles. 2018 Jul;22(4):665-673
pubmed: 29687212
Int J Mol Sci. 2013 Apr 02;14(4):7370-90
pubmed: 23549270
F1000Res. 2016 Jun 27;5:1519
pubmed: 27853510
Med Hypotheses. 2010 Feb;74(2):214-5
pubmed: 19836146
Front Microbiol. 2018 Jun 29;9:1390
pubmed: 30008701
Sci Rep. 2016 Nov 18;6:36773
pubmed: 27857159
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2015 Feb;65(Pt 2):578-586
pubmed: 25404481
Sci Rep. 2019 Jan 31;9(1):1042
pubmed: 30705356
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017 Oct;15(10):579-590
pubmed: 28824177
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Nov 11;2019:4943150
pubmed: 31815142
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Apr 10;764:144231
pubmed: 33385649
PeerJ. 2019 Mar 26;7:e6657
pubmed: 30941274
J Eukaryot Microbiol. 1999 Jul-Aug;46(4):327-38
pubmed: 10461381
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Feb 18;117(7):3874-3883
pubmed: 32015118
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Aug 6;116(32):15979-15984
pubmed: 31270235
Science. 2000 Sep 1;289(5484):1542-1546
pubmed: 10968788
ISME J. 2012 Mar;6(3):610-8
pubmed: 22134646
Bioinformatics. 2012 Jan 1;28(1):112-8
pubmed: 22039212
Bioinformatics. 2010 Oct 1;26(19):2460-1
pubmed: 20709691
Annu Rev Microbiol. 2016 Sep 8;70:215-34
pubmed: 27607552
Genom Data. 2017 Jan 05;11:109-112
pubmed: 28116242
Microb Ecol. 2004 Jan;47(1):96-103
pubmed: 15259274
Front Microbiol. 2018 Nov 20;9:2710
pubmed: 30524385
Trends Plant Sci. 2018 Jan;23(1):25-41
pubmed: 29050989
BMC Bioinformatics. 2013 Jul 09;14:217
pubmed: 23837656
Trends Ecol Evol. 1994 May;9(5):191-3
pubmed: 21236818
BMC Microbiol. 2013 May 24;13:114
pubmed: 23705801
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 12;8(1):5875
pubmed: 29651160
Front Plant Sci. 2019 Mar 20;10:281
pubmed: 30949187
Sci Rep. 2021 May 24;11(1):10803
pubmed: 34031502
BMC Microbiol. 2008 Jul 24;8:125
pubmed: 18652685
Nature. 2012 Aug 2;488(7409):91-5
pubmed: 22859207
Science. 2005 Mar 25;307(5717):1915-20
pubmed: 15790844
Microb Biotechnol. 2013 Jan;6(1):36-44
pubmed: 22883414
ISME J. 2009 Oct;3(10):1127-38
pubmed: 19554036
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Nov 16;118(46):
pubmed: 34725254
Nature. 2015 Dec 24;528(7583):504-9
pubmed: 26610024
Front Microbiol. 2020 Apr 08;11:571
pubmed: 32322245
New Phytol. 2019 Aug;223(3):1047-1051
pubmed: 31304606
Trends Plant Sci. 2012 Aug;17(8):478-86
pubmed: 22564542
Nature. 2018 Aug;560(7717):233-237
pubmed: 30069051
Mucosal Immunol. 2010 Sep;3(5):450-60
pubmed: 20445502
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018 May;16(5):291-303
pubmed: 29379215
ISME J. 2019 Feb;13(2):442-454
pubmed: 30287886
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Aug 01;13:948736
pubmed: 35979075
Sci Data. 2018 Oct 30;5:180214
pubmed: 30375988
J Exp Bot. 2021 Jan 20;72(1):57-69
pubmed: 32995888
Glob Chang Biol. 2019 May;25(5):1733-1745
pubmed: 30706600
Microb Ecol. 2021 Nov;82(4):961-970
pubmed: 33660069
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2013;64:807-38
pubmed: 23373698
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2011 Jul;35(4):681-704
pubmed: 21361997
New Phytol. 2019 Apr;222(1):52-69
pubmed: 30449035
Cell Host Microbe. 2015 Mar 11;17(3):392-403
pubmed: 25732064
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2011 May;76(2):301-10
pubmed: 21261668
Nat Methods. 2010 May;7(5):335-6
pubmed: 20383131
Int J Phytoremediation. 2018 Jan 28;20(2):114-120
pubmed: 28613914
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Feb 24;112(8):E911-20
pubmed: 25605935
Front Microbiol. 2020 Jun 26;11:1424
pubmed: 32676064
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 23;8(1):12696
pubmed: 30140025
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Aug 22;285(1885):
pubmed: 30135157
Microbiome. 2017 Jan 17;5(1):2
pubmed: 28095877
Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 21;12(1):17715
pubmed: 36271133
Microb Biotechnol. 2020 Sep;13(5):1314-1335
pubmed: 31797528
Nature. 2012 Aug 2;488(7409):86-90
pubmed: 22859206
Science. 2020 Apr 17;368(6488):270-274
pubmed: 32299947
Science. 1960 Apr 29;131(3409):1292-7
pubmed: 14399717
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Aug 6;116(32):15760-15762
pubmed: 31320585