Enhancement of Ultrasound B-Mode Image Quality Using Nonlinear Filtered-Multiply-and-Sum Compounding for Improved Carotid Artery Segmentation.

active contour biomedical common carotid artery filtered multiply and sum filtered-delay multiply and sum ultrasound B-mode imaging

Journal

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Mar 2023
Historique:
received: 22 02 2023
revised: 12 03 2023
accepted: 16 03 2023
medline: 30 3 2023
entrez: 29 3 2023
pubmed: 30 3 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In ultrasound B-mode imaging, the axial resolution (AR) is commonly determined by the duration or bandwidth of an excitation signal. A shorter-duration pulse will produce better resolution compared to a longer one but with compromised penetration depth. Instead of relying on the pulse duration or bandwidth to improve the AR, an alternative method termed filtered multiply and sum (FMAS) has been introduced in our previous work. For spatial-compounding, FMAS uses the autocorrelation technique as used in filtered-delay multiply and sum (FDMAS), instead of conventional averaging. FMAS enables a higher frame rate and less computational complexity than conventional plane-wave compound imaging beamformed with delay and sum (DAS) and FDMAS. Moreover, it can provide an improved contrast ratio and AR. In previous work, no explanation was given on how FMAS was able to improve the AR. Thus, in this work, we discuss in detail the theory behind the proposed FMAS algorithm and how it is able to improve the spatial resolution mainly in the axial direction. Simulations, experimental phantom measurements and in vivo studies were conducted to benchmark the performance of the proposed method. We also demonstrate how the suggested new algorithm may be used in a practical biomedical imaging application. The balloon snake active contour segmentation technique was applied to the ultrasound B-mode image of a common carotid artery produced with FMAS. The suggested method is capable of reducing the number of iterations for the snake to settle on the region-of-interest contour, accelerating the segmentation process.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36980469
pii: diagnostics13061161
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13061161
pmc: PMC10047674
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Ministry of Higher Education
ID : FRGS/1/2019/TK04/UKM/03/4

Références

Ultrasonics. 2022 Apr;121:106669
pubmed: 35007837
Technol Health Care. 2023;31(1):217-237
pubmed: 35964219
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jan 08;21(2):
pubmed: 33429947
Int J Cardiol. 2019 Mar 1;278:295-299
pubmed: 30545621
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2021 Mar;68(3):446-452
pubmed: 32746209
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 May 08;12(5):
pubmed: 35626326
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2020 Nov;15(11):1835-1846
pubmed: 32839888
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2021 Mar;68(3):453-464
pubmed: 32746224
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Feb 16;13(4):
pubmed: 36832237
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015 Apr;34(4):940-9
pubmed: 25420256
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2012 Jan;59(1):40-9
pubmed: 22293734
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Mar 05;18(3):
pubmed: 29510584
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2009 Mar;56(3):489-506
pubmed: 19411209
Ultrasonics. 2022 Dec;126:106832
pubmed: 36027689
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2018 Dec;65(12):2277-2285
pubmed: 29993686
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016 Aug;2016:3223-3226
pubmed: 28268994
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2016 Nov;63(11):1922-1934
pubmed: 27824568
Ultrasonics. 2014 Dec;54(8):2184-92
pubmed: 24965564
Ultrasonics. 2017 Mar;75:216-225
pubmed: 28011340
J Digit Imaging. 2013 Dec;26(6):1071-81
pubmed: 23417308
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2022 Feb;69(2):580-591
pubmed: 34767507
Cardiol Ther. 2022 Jun;11(2):231-247
pubmed: 35362868
Med Phys. 2019 Jan;46(1):215-228
pubmed: 30374980
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020 Jul;46(7):1608-1613
pubmed: 32386846

Auteurs

Asraf Mohamed Moubark (A)

Department of Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia.

Luzhen Nie (L)

School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.

Mohd Hairi Mohd Zaman (MH)

Department of Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia.

Mohammad Tariqul Islam (MT)

Department of Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia.

Mohd Asyraf Zulkifley (MA)

Department of Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia.

Mohd Hafiz Baharuddin (MH)

Department of Electrical, Electronic and Systems Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia.

Zainab Alomari (Z)

Department of Communications Engineering, Electronics Engineering College, Ninevah University, Mosul 41002, Iraq.

Steven Freear (S)

School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.

Classifications MeSH