Refining the Characterization and Outcome of Pathological Complete Responders after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Lessons from the Randomized Phase III VESPER (GETUG-AFU V05) Trial.
cisplatin-based chemotherapy
muscle-invasive bladder cancer
neoadjuvant treatment
pathological complete response
Journal
Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Mar 2023
13 Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
14
02
2023
revised:
06
03
2023
accepted:
07
03
2023
medline:
30
3
2023
entrez:
29
3
2023
pubmed:
30
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection is the optimal treatment for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. In recent years, the VESPER trial showed a statistically significant higher progression-free survival with dd-MVAC (dose dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin) compared to GC (gemcitabine and cisplatin). In the present report, we refine the characterization and outcome of patients whose cystectomy specimens were pathologically free of cancer (pathological complete response, pCR). We confirm that these patients portend a better outcome as compared to patients with invasive disease (≥pT1N0) at cystectomy. Nested variant and lymphovascular invasion were identified as adverse predictive factors of pCR. Progression-free survival probability three years after pCR on cystectomy was about 85%, regardless of the NAC regimen. A lower creatinine clearance and the delivery of less than four cycles were associated with a higher risk of relapse. Predicting the efficacy of NAC remains a major challenge. The planned analysis of molecular subtypes in the VESPER trial could help predict which patients may achieve complete response and better outcome.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36980628
pii: cancers15061742
doi: 10.3390/cancers15061742
pmc: PMC10046214
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jun 20;32(18):1889-94
pubmed: 24821883
Urol Oncol. 2018 Jun;36(6):293-305
pubmed: 29685374
Urology. 2015 Jul;86(1):92-8
pubmed: 26051839
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022 Aug;20(8):866-878
pubmed: 35948037
Eur Urol. 2014 Feb;65(2):350-7
pubmed: 23849998
Eur Urol. 2020 Feb;77(2):223-250
pubmed: 31753752
Eur Urol. 2012 Jun;61(6):1229-38
pubmed: 22189383
Oncologist. 2016 Jun;21(6):708-15
pubmed: 27053504
J Urol. 2006 Dec;176(6 Pt 1):2414-22; discussion 2422
pubmed: 17085118
Eur Urol. 2021 Feb;79(2):214-221
pubmed: 32868138
Nat Med. 2013 Nov;19(11):1450-64
pubmed: 24202397
Eur Urol. 2007 Sep;52(3):769-74
pubmed: 17434254
Eur Urol Focus. 2020 Jul 15;6(4):653-663
pubmed: 31530497
Cancer. 2009 Sep 15;115(18):4104-9
pubmed: 19517476
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Feb 1;19(3):666-75
pubmed: 11157016
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2022 Jun;20(3):199-209
pubmed: 35042666
J Urol. 2018 Jun;199(6):1452-1458
pubmed: 29329894
Eur Urol Oncol. 2019 Nov;2(6):625-642
pubmed: 31601522
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jul 1;36(19):1949-1956
pubmed: 29742009
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Nov 20;34(33):3959-3962
pubmed: 27551115
Urol Oncol. 2020 Jan;38(1):3.e17-3.e27
pubmed: 31676278
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2021 Dec;19(6):554-562
pubmed: 34602349
Cancer. 2015 Aug 1;121(15):2586-93
pubmed: 25872978
Virchows Arch. 2014 Aug;465(2):199-205
pubmed: 24878757
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Nov 1;4(11):1535-1542
pubmed: 30178038
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Jan 30;17:100536
pubmed: 32083220
Cancer. 2019 Sep 15;125(18):3155-3163
pubmed: 31150110
N Engl J Med. 2003 Aug 28;349(9):859-66
pubmed: 12944571
Eur Urol. 2005 Aug;48(2):202-5; discussion 205-6
pubmed: 15939524
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jun 20;32(18):1895-901
pubmed: 24821881
Histopathology. 2019 Dec;75(6):865-875
pubmed: 31348552
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jun 20;40(18):2013-2022
pubmed: 35254888
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun 1;29(16):2171-7
pubmed: 21502557