Non-Destructive Eggshell Strength Assessment Using Hertz Contact Theory Part I: Theory and Applicability.

Hertz contact theory Young’s Modulus eggshell impact eggshell strength non-destructive measurement quasi-static compression

Journal

Foods (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2304-8158
Titre abrégé: Foods
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101670569

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 Mar 2023
Historique:
received: 16 02 2023
revised: 03 03 2023
accepted: 07 03 2023
medline: 30 3 2023
entrez: 29 3 2023
pubmed: 30 3 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

In the egg industry, fast and highly reliable quality measurements are crucial. This study presents a novel method based on Hertz contact theory that allows for non-destructive determination of eggshell strength. The goal of the study was to evaluate the material strength (Young's Modulus) and structural strength (stiffness) of eggshells. To this end, an experimental setup was constructed to measure the collision of an eggshell with a small steel ball, which was recorded using a laser vibrometer. The study analyzed a sample of 120 eggs and found a correlation of 0.85 between the traditional static stiffness measured during quasi-static compression tests and the stiffness obtained from the Hertz contact theory. The results show that Hertz contact theory is valid for small steel spheres impacting eggshells, while a sensitivity analysis indicated that the most important factor in determining the strength of the eggshell is the contact duration between the egg and the impactor. These results open up the possibility of grading eggs based on their shell strength in a non-destructive manner.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36981114
pii: foods12061189
doi: 10.3390/foods12061189
pmc: PMC10048234
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Research Foundation - Flanders
ID : SB project 1SC7219N
Organisme : KU Leuven - Belgium
ID : Industrial Research Fund and postdoctoral grant

Références

Poult Sci. 2006 Sep;85(9):1670-7
pubmed: 16977856
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Nov 02;21(21):
pubmed: 34770605
Br Poult Sci. 1999 May;40(2):227-32
pubmed: 10465390
Scientifica (Cairo). 2022 Oct 30;2022:1393392
pubmed: 36349300
Br Poult Sci. 2002 May;43(2):238-44
pubmed: 12047088
Br Poult Sci. 2005 Jun;46(3):280-6
pubmed: 16050180
Curr Res Food Sci. 2021 Oct 06;4:716-723
pubmed: 34693343

Auteurs

Bart De Ketelaere (B)

Division of Mechatronics, Biostatistics and Sensors (MeBioS)-Department of Biosystems, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg, 30, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.

Matthias Corion (M)

Division of Mechatronics, Biostatistics and Sensors (MeBioS)-Department of Biosystems, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg, 30, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.

Ines Adriaens (I)

Division Animal and Human Health Engineering (A2H)-Department of Biosystems, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kleinhoefstraat 4, 2440 Geel, Belgium.

Paul Van Liedekerke (P)

BIOMATH-Department of Data Analysis and Mathematical Modelling, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.

Wouter Saeys (W)

Division of Mechatronics, Biostatistics and Sensors (MeBioS)-Department of Biosystems, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg, 30, 3001 Leuven, Belgium.

Classifications MeSH