The Effect of Cognitive Training with Neurofeedback on Cognitive Function in Healthy Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

NIRS cognitive function cognitive training memory neurofeedback

Journal

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2227-9032
Titre abrégé: Healthcare (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101666525

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Mar 2023
Historique:
received: 28 01 2023
revised: 01 03 2023
accepted: 10 03 2023
medline: 30 3 2023
entrez: 29 3 2023
pubmed: 30 3 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Cognitive training aims to improve cognitive function through cognitive tasks or training games. Neurofeedback is a technique to monitor brain signals with either visual or auditory feedback. Previous studies suggest that a combination of cognitive training and neurofeedback has a superior effect on cognitive functions compared with cognitive training alone. However, no systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the benefits of cognitive training with neurofeedback (CTNF) exist. The purpose of this study was to examine the beneficial effects of CTNF in healthy adults using a systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis. PubMed, Scopus, PsychoINFO, and MEDLINE were searched for research papers reporting the results of interventions using CTNF. After an initial screening of 234 records, three studies using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and one study using electroencephalography were extracted from the database. We performed a multi-level meta-analysis with three NIRS studies including 166 participants (mean ages ranged from 21.43 to 65.96 years). A multi-level meta-analysis revealed that CTNF has a beneficial effect on the episodic, long-term, and working memory domains. Although three studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis, our results indicate that CTNF using NIRS would lead to improvements in memory functioning.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Cognitive training aims to improve cognitive function through cognitive tasks or training games. Neurofeedback is a technique to monitor brain signals with either visual or auditory feedback. Previous studies suggest that a combination of cognitive training and neurofeedback has a superior effect on cognitive functions compared with cognitive training alone. However, no systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the benefits of cognitive training with neurofeedback (CTNF) exist. The purpose of this study was to examine the beneficial effects of CTNF in healthy adults using a systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis.
METHODS METHODS
PubMed, Scopus, PsychoINFO, and MEDLINE were searched for research papers reporting the results of interventions using CTNF.
RESULTS RESULTS
After an initial screening of 234 records, three studies using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and one study using electroencephalography were extracted from the database. We performed a multi-level meta-analysis with three NIRS studies including 166 participants (mean ages ranged from 21.43 to 65.96 years). A multi-level meta-analysis revealed that CTNF has a beneficial effect on the episodic, long-term, and working memory domains.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Although three studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis, our results indicate that CTNF using NIRS would lead to improvements in memory functioning.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36981504
pii: healthcare11060843
doi: 10.3390/healthcare11060843
pmc: PMC10048721
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : 19H01760
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : 22H01088

Références

Arch Dis Child. 2005 Aug;90(8):837-40
pubmed: 16040884
Front Aging Neurosci. 2016 Dec 23;8:302
pubmed: 28066229
Evid Based Ment Health. 2019 Nov;22(4):153-160
pubmed: 31563865
Psychol Sci. 2007 Jul;18(7):614-21
pubmed: 17614870
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Jun 17;10:301
pubmed: 27378892
Nutrients. 2021 Jan 25;13(2):
pubmed: 33503851
Neuroscientist. 2007 Jun;13(3):280-91
pubmed: 17519370
Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2020 Jul-Sep;9(3):193-205
pubmed: 30734583
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 27;9:401
pubmed: 29636715
Front Psychol. 2021 May 26;12:662139
pubmed: 34122249
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Aug;24(4):1077-1096
pubmed: 28116702
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 19;:
pubmed: 35182242
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2007 Jun 15;7:16
pubmed: 17573961
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71
pubmed: 33782057
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(2):vii-xxxiv
pubmed: 20593321
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2021 Nov;177(9):1133-1144
pubmed: 34674879
Front Neurosci. 2020 Jul 21;14:594
pubmed: 32848528
Child Neuropsychol. 2002 Jun;8(2):71-82
pubmed: 12638061
Neuroimage. 2016 Jul 1;134:153-159
pubmed: 27015711
Ageing Res Rev. 2014 May;15:28-43
pubmed: 24607830
Brain Sci. 2020 Aug 15;10(8):
pubmed: 32824185
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 02;19(9):
pubmed: 35564926
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2010 Sep;16(5):754-60
pubmed: 20673381
Nutrients. 2020 Feb 27;12(3):
pubmed: 32120794
J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 Apr 1;14(3):340-7
pubmed: 11970796
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Jan 05;14:562360
pubmed: 33469422
Aust J Physiother. 2009;55(2):129-33
pubmed: 19463084
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Jun 2;75(6):e69-e77
pubmed: 30657966
Brain Imaging Behav. 2017 Feb;11(1):141-154
pubmed: 26843001
Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Mar 27;6:63
pubmed: 22470330
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Mar 31;14:826672
pubmed: 35431898
Phys Ther. 2003 Aug;83(8):713-21
pubmed: 12882612
J Aging Health. 2022 Aug-Sep;34(4-5):529-538
pubmed: 34620009
Brain Sci. 2021 Dec 21;12(1):
pubmed: 35053748
Cognition. 2013 Feb;126(2):335-40
pubmed: 23122635
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2006 Oct;21(7):623-43
pubmed: 17014981
Psychol Res. 2020 Sep;84(6):1586-1609
pubmed: 31053887
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 03;19(17):
pubmed: 36078752
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Jul 13;9(7):
pubmed: 34356259
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018 Nov;72(11):990-996
pubmed: 29970598
Front Aging Neurosci. 2019 May 07;11:99
pubmed: 31133842
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55518
pubmed: 23405164
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Aug 03;10(8):
pubmed: 36011119
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Sep 14;75(8):e174-e188
pubmed: 32507890
J Cogn Neurosci. 1997 Jul;9(4):462-75
pubmed: 23968211

Auteurs

Yutaka Matsuzaki (Y)

Division of Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Development, Aging, and Cancer (IDAC), Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8575, Japan.

Rui Nouchi (R)

Department of Cognitive Health Science, Institute of Development, Aging, and Cancer (IDAC), Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8575, Japan.
Smart Aging Research Center (S.A.R.C.), Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8575, Japan.

Kohei Sakaki (K)

Department of Functional Brain Imaging, Institute of Development, Aging, and Cancer (IDAC), Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8575, Japan.

Jérôme Dinet (J)

Laboratoire Lorrain de Psychologie et Neurosciences de la Dynamique des Comportements (2LPN), Université de Lorraine, F-54000 Nancy, France.

Ryuta Kawashima (R)

Division of Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, Institute of Development, Aging, and Cancer (IDAC), Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8575, Japan.
Department of Cognitive Health Science, Institute of Development, Aging, and Cancer (IDAC), Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8575, Japan.
Smart Aging Research Center (S.A.R.C.), Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8575, Japan.
Department of Functional Brain Imaging, Institute of Development, Aging, and Cancer (IDAC), Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8575, Japan.

Classifications MeSH