Variability of Visual Recovery with Time in Epiretinal Membrane Surgery: A Predictive Analysis Based on Retinal Layer OCT Thickness Changes.
epiretinal membrane
optical coherence tomography
pattern
prediction
timing
visual recovery
vitrectomy
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 Mar 2023
08 Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
17
12
2022
revised:
13
02
2023
accepted:
01
03
2023
medline:
30
3
2023
entrez:
29
3
2023
pubmed:
30
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To correlate postoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) thickness changes of each retinal layer with different patterns of visual recovery after idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery in a cohort of patients showing no known risk factors for poor visual recovery at preoperative imaging. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and OCT images were acquired preoperatively and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months postoperatively. Patients were divided into four groups according to postoperative BCVA improvement: improvement < 15 ETDRS letters (GROUP 1), immediate improvement of BCVA without further improvements at later follow-ups (GROUP 2), immediate improvement of BCVA with further improvements at later follow-ups (GROUP 3) and delayed improvement of BCVA (GROUP 4). Eighty-five patients were included. GROUP1 was the only one characterized by retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness increase and ganglion cell layer/central macular thickness (GCL/CMT) ratio decrease at 1 month and outer nuclear layer (ONL) thickness decrease at 3 and 6 months. GROUP 2 was the only one showing a decrease in GCL/inner plexiform layer (GCL/IPL) ratio at 1 month. GROUP 3 and 4 showed higher preoperative RNFL thickness compared to the other, and GROUP 4 manifested a late increase in RNFL thickness at 6 months. Different patterns of VA recovery are associated with specific layer thickness changes. If further confirmed, this would help detect those cases characterized by poor or delayed visual recovery despite the absence of other known imaging risk factors.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36983110
pii: jcm12062107
doi: 10.3390/jcm12062107
pmc: PMC10059266
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Retina. 2017 Oct;37(10):1813-1819
pubmed: 28207608
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 16;12(6):e0179105
pubmed: 28622372
Ophthalmology. 2015 Apr;122(4):787-95
pubmed: 25556116
Eye (Lond). 2013 May;27(5):644-51
pubmed: 23449509
Retina. 2011 Jul-Aug;31(7):1366-72
pubmed: 21233786
Retina. 2023 Feb 1;43(2):173-181
pubmed: 36228144
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007 Nov;245(11):1623-31
pubmed: 17479277
Ophthalmology. 1997 Jun;104(6):1033-40
pubmed: 9186446
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Sep;256(9):1573-1580
pubmed: 29948176
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Sep 19;11(9):
pubmed: 34574058
Ophthalmology. 2006 Feb;113(2):280-4
pubmed: 16458094
Retina. 2012 Sep;32 Suppl 2:S200-3; discussion S203-4
pubmed: 22929321
Ophthalmology. 2014 Aug;121(8):1579-87
pubmed: 24703380
Eye (Lond). 2013 Oct;27 Suppl 1:S1-21
pubmed: 24108069
Ophthalmology. 2003 Jan;110(1):62-4
pubmed: 12511347
Retina. 2016 Feb;36(2):305-10
pubmed: 26296145
Eye (Lond). 2008 Oct;22(10):1310-7
pubmed: 18344963
Clin Ophthalmol. 2019 Jul 15;13:1253-1265
pubmed: 31409964
Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Apr;153(4):692-7, 697.e1-2
pubmed: 22137206
Retina. 2013 May;33(5):1026-34
pubmed: 23400080
Retina. 2013 Apr;33(4):776-84
pubmed: 23222390
Br J Ophthalmol. 1981 Jan;65(1):23-8
pubmed: 7448155
Mediators Inflamm. 2013;2013:192582
pubmed: 24324293
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013 Apr;131(4):525-30
pubmed: 23579603
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Apr;251(4):1055-64
pubmed: 22875136
Retina. 2018 Sep;38(9):1777-1785
pubmed: 28699929
Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Apr;153(4):698-704, 704.e1
pubmed: 22245463
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 08;10(9):e0137316
pubmed: 26349053
Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Mar;175:99-113
pubmed: 27993592