Chemotherapy Response Score in Ovarian Cancer Patients: An Overview of Its Clinical Utility.
chemotherapy response
interval debulking surgery
ovarian cancer
overall survival
progression-free survival
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Mar 2023
10 Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
31
01
2023
revised:
04
03
2023
accepted:
08
03
2023
medline:
30
3
2023
entrez:
29
3
2023
pubmed:
30
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The chemotherapy response score has been developed over the last few years as a predictive index of survival outcomes for patients with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing interval debulking surgery. While its importance in predicting patients at risk of developing recurrences earlier seems to be important, its accuracy in determining patients with a shorter overall survival remains arbitrary. Moreover, standardization of the actual scoring system that was initially developed as a 6-tiered score and adopted as a 3-tiered score is still needed, as several studies suggest that a 2-tiered system is preferable. Given its actual importance in detecting patients with shorter progression-free survival, research should also focus on the actual predictive value of determining patients with platinum resistance, as a suboptimal patient response to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy might help determine patients at risk of an earlier recurrence. In the present review, we summarize current knowledge retrieved from studies addressing outcomes related to the chemotherapy response score in epithelial ovarian cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and discuss differences in outcome reporting to help provide directions for further research.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36983157
pii: jcm12062155
doi: 10.3390/jcm12062155
pmc: PMC10054535
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018 Nov;28(9):1676-1682
pubmed: 30256239
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Nov;30(11):1657-1664
pubmed: 33028623
Am J Surg Pathol. 2020 Feb;44(2):206-213
pubmed: 31651523
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 12;12(2):
pubmed: 36675556
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Mar 04;12(3):
pubmed: 35328186
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Dec;19(12):1680-1687
pubmed: 30413383
Front Oncol. 2019 Aug 19;9:778
pubmed: 31482065
Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Aug;154(2):441-448
pubmed: 31118141
Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Jul;106(1):160-3
pubmed: 17490737
Br J Cancer. 2020 Apr;122(8):1219-1230
pubmed: 32099096
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Aug 1;33(22):2457-63
pubmed: 26124480
Ann Oncol. 2019 May 1;30(5):672-705
pubmed: 31046081
J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Dec;197(6):955-63
pubmed: 14644284
J Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Nov;28(6):e73
pubmed: 28758379
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2020 Apr 7;50(4):379-386
pubmed: 32083282
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2008 Sep;6(8):803-10; quiz 811
pubmed: 18926091
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Mar-Apr;66(2):115-32
pubmed: 26808342
Int J Cancer. 2009 Apr 1;124(7):1579-86
pubmed: 19123469
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Sep;14(10):1020-6
pubmed: 23948349
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010 Nov;20(8):1331-40
pubmed: 21051973
Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2019 May;38(3):230-240
pubmed: 29750700
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Sep 07;14(18):
pubmed: 36139523
Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2017 Mar;36(2):172-179
pubmed: 27362902
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):e1-34
pubmed: 19631507