Effect of Changes in Surgical Strategies for the Treatment of Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment on Functional and Anatomical Outcomes: A Retrospective Analysis of 812 Cases from the Years 2004 to 2012.
combined vitrectomy/scleral buckling
primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment
retinal detachment surgery outcomes
scleral buckling
vitrectomy
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Mar 2023
15 Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
13
02
2023
revised:
09
03
2023
accepted:
13
03
2023
medline:
30
3
2023
entrez:
29
3
2023
pubmed:
30
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
At the Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry at the MUV surgical method (scleral buckling, vitrectomy, combined vitrectomy/scleral buckling) and timing (daytime, nighttime) for the treatment of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) changed continuously in the years 2004 to 2012. This study aims to evaluate changes in surgical strategies over time including their impact on functional and anatomical outcomes. Retrospective evaluation of patients operated on primary RRD between the years 2004 and 2012. Baseline demographic data, month 3 best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), surgical method, single success surgery, surgical timing, and intraoperative complications were analyzed. Overall, 812 eyes of 812 patients with a mean (±SD) age of 58.1 ± 13.3 years were included. A total of 413 (51%) patients presented with macula-on and 359 (44%) with macula-off RRD. Month 3 BCVA increased over time, both in macula-on or macula-off groups ( Our data showed that improving functional and single-success surgery outcomes in patients operated on for primary RRD. In the years 2004 to 2012, surgical techniques shifted from scleral buckling to primary vitrectomy and were increasingly scheduled during the daytime.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
At the Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry at the MUV surgical method (scleral buckling, vitrectomy, combined vitrectomy/scleral buckling) and timing (daytime, nighttime) for the treatment of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) changed continuously in the years 2004 to 2012. This study aims to evaluate changes in surgical strategies over time including their impact on functional and anatomical outcomes.
METHODS
METHODS
Retrospective evaluation of patients operated on primary RRD between the years 2004 and 2012. Baseline demographic data, month 3 best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), surgical method, single success surgery, surgical timing, and intraoperative complications were analyzed.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Overall, 812 eyes of 812 patients with a mean (±SD) age of 58.1 ± 13.3 years were included. A total of 413 (51%) patients presented with macula-on and 359 (44%) with macula-off RRD. Month 3 BCVA increased over time, both in macula-on or macula-off groups (
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Our data showed that improving functional and single-success surgery outcomes in patients operated on for primary RRD. In the years 2004 to 2012, surgical techniques shifted from scleral buckling to primary vitrectomy and were increasingly scheduled during the daytime.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36983279
pii: jcm12062278
doi: 10.3390/jcm12062278
pmc: PMC10057392
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Eye (Lond). 2002 Jul;16(4):440-6
pubmed: 12101451
Retina. 2014 Oct;34(10):1917-25
pubmed: 25121930
Ophthalmic Res. 2014;51(1):15-31
pubmed: 24158005
Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1972 Mar-Apr;76(2):462-6
pubmed: 4667660
Ophthalmology. 2013 Sep;120(9):1804-8
pubmed: 23601799
J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:4310643
pubmed: 28584664
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008 Nov;90(8):651-7
pubmed: 18990280
Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1971 Jul-Aug;75(4):813-20
pubmed: 5566980
Ophthalmology. 2007 Dec;114(12):2142-54
pubmed: 18054633
Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 Aug;150(2):205-210.e2
pubmed: 20541738
Br J Ophthalmol. 2013 Feb;97(2):149-52
pubmed: 23159447
Retina. 2018 Jan;38(1):137-147
pubmed: 28099315
Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 Apr;149(4):630-634.e1
pubmed: 20138604
Ophthalmology. 2013 Sep;120(9):1809-13
pubmed: 23601805
Ophthalmology. 2006 Oct;113(10):1734-42
pubmed: 17011955
Br J Ophthalmol. 2010 Jun;94(6):678-84
pubmed: 19515646
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd Augenarztl Fortbild. 1956;129(4):476-95
pubmed: 13386159
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1982;80:475-97
pubmed: 6763802
Am J Ophthalmol. 1972 Jan;73(1):1-7
pubmed: 5007347
Eye (Lond). 2013 Sep;27(9):1063-9
pubmed: 23788207
Ophthalmology. 1992 Sep;99(9):1358-63
pubmed: 1407969
Ophthalmologica. 2006;220(3):174-80
pubmed: 16679792
Retina. 2013 Jan;33(1):105-10
pubmed: 22990323
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 08;3:CD009562
pubmed: 30848830
Ophthalmology. 1986 May;93(5):626-41
pubmed: 3523357
Acta Ophthalmol. 2020 Sep;98(6):603-606
pubmed: 32086859
Eye (Lond). 2006 Sep;20(9):1049-53
pubmed: 16151481
Acta Ophthalmol. 2016 Dec;94(8):824-828
pubmed: 27272714
AMA Arch Ophthalmol. 1957 Dec;58(6):797-811
pubmed: 13478226
Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Apr;139(4):605-10
pubmed: 15808154