Mycelium-Based Composite Materials: Study of Acceptance.

aesthetics bio-design customer perspective eco-aesthetics fast fashion furniture design interior design mycelium-based composites mycomaterials

Journal

Materials (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1996-1944
Titre abrégé: Materials (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101555929

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Mar 2023
Historique:
received: 11 02 2023
revised: 02 03 2023
accepted: 04 03 2023
medline: 30 3 2023
entrez: 29 3 2023
pubmed: 30 3 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Mycelium-based composites (MBCs) are alternative biopolymers for designing sustainable furniture and other interior elements. These innovative biocomposites have many ecological advantages but present a new challenge in aesthetics and human product acceptance. Grown products, made using living mycelium and lignocellulosic substrates, are porous, have irregular surfaces and have irregular coloring. The natural origin of these types of materials and the fear of fungus can be a challenge. This research investigated the level of human acceptance of the new material. Respondents were students of architecture who can be considered as people involved in interior design and competent in the design field. Research has been performed on the authors' prototype products made from MBCs. Three complementary consumer tests were performed. The obtained results measured the human reactions and demonstrated to which extents products made of MBCs were "likeable" and their nonobvious aesthetics were acceptable to the public. The results showed that MBC materials generally had a positive or not-negative assessment. The responses after the pairwise comparison of the MBC with wall cladding samples pointed out the advantage of ceramic reference material above the MBC based on an overall assessment. The respondents also believed that the chamotte clay cladding would be easier to fit into the aesthetics of a modern interior and would in better accordance with its style. Although the MBC was less visually appealing, the respondents nevertheless found it more interesting, original, and environmentally friendly. The experiments suggested that the respondents had double standards regarding MBCs. MBCs were generally accepted as ecological, but not in their own homes. All of these results support current and future applications of MBCs for manufacturing items where enhanced aesthetics are required.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36984044
pii: ma16062164
doi: 10.3390/ma16062164
pmc: PMC10051586
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Références

Materials (Basel). 2022 Sep 09;15(18):
pubmed: 36143594
Biosystems. 2022 Feb;212:104588
pubmed: 34979157
Polymers (Basel). 2021 Dec 31;14(1):
pubmed: 35012167
Biomimetics (Basel). 2022 Apr 14;7(2):
pubmed: 35466261
J Food Sci. 2015 Jan;80(1):S161-70
pubmed: 25559310
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change. 2014 Sep;5(5):587-603
pubmed: 25798197
Fungal Biol Biotechnol. 2019 Oct 26;6:17
pubmed: 31673396
Fungal Biol Biotechnol. 2022 Feb 24;9(1):3
pubmed: 35209958
Environ Health. 2018 Dec 27;17(1):92
pubmed: 30591057

Auteurs

Agata Bonenberg (A)

Institute of Interior Design and Industrial Design, Faculty of Architecture, Poznan University of Technology, 61-131 Poznań, Poland.

Maciej Sydor (M)

Department of Woodworking and Fundamentals of Machine Design, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Poznań University of Life Sciences, 60-637 Poznań, Poland.

Grzegorz Cofta (G)

Department of Chemical Wood Technology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Poznań University of Life Sciences, 60-637 Poznań, Poland.

Beata Doczekalska (B)

Department of Chemical Wood Technology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Poznań University of Life Sciences, 60-637 Poznań, Poland.

Klaudia Grygorowicz-Kosakowska (K)

Institute of Interior Design and Industrial Design, Faculty of Architecture, Poznan University of Technology, 61-131 Poznań, Poland.

Classifications MeSH