Forming intracluster gas in a galaxy protocluster at a redshift of 2.16.
Journal
Nature
ISSN: 1476-4687
Titre abrégé: Nature
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0410462
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2023
03 2023
Historique:
received:
28
05
2022
accepted:
25
01
2023
medline:
31
3
2023
entrez:
29
3
2023
pubmed:
30
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Galaxy clusters are the most massive gravitationally bound structures in the Universe, comprising thousands of galaxies and pervaded by a diffuse, hot intracluster medium (ICM) that dominates the baryonic content of these systems. The formation and evolution of the ICM across cosmic time
Identifiants
pubmed: 36991192
doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05761-x
pii: 10.1038/s41586-023-05761-x
pmc: PMC10060161
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
809-812Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Kravtsov, A. V. & Borgani, S. Formation of galaxy clusters. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 50, 353–409 (2012).
doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125502
Sunyaev, R. A. & Zeldovich, Y. B. The observations of relic radiation as a test of the nature of X-ray radiation from the clusters of galaxies. Comments Astrophys. Space Phys. 4, 173 (1972).
Mroczkowski, T. et al. Astrophysics with the spatially and spectrally resolved Sunyaev-Zeldovich effects: a millimetre/submillimetre probe of the warm and hot universe. Space Sci. Rev. 215, 17 (2019).
doi: 10.1007/s11214-019-0581-2
Overzier, R. A. The realm of the galaxy protoclusters: a review. Astron. Astrophys. Rev. 24, 14 (2016).
doi: 10.1007/s00159-016-0100-3
Zhang, C., Yu, Q. & Lu, Y. A baryonic effect on the merger timescale of galaxy clusters. Astrophys. J. 820, 85 (2016).
doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/820/2/85
Carilli, C. L., Röttgering, H. J. A., van Ojik, R., Miley, G. K. & van Breugel, W. J. M. Radio continuum imaging of high-redshift radio galaxies. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 109, 1–44 (1997).
doi: 10.1086/312973
Pentericci, L., Roettgering, H. J. A., Miley, G. K., Carilli, C. L. & McCarthy, P. The radio galaxy 1138–262 at z=2.2: a giant elliptical galaxy at the center of a proto-cluster? Astron. Astrophys. 326, 580–596 (1997).
Anderson, C. S. et al. The Spiderweb protocluster is being magnetized by its central radio jet. Astrophys. J. 937, 45 (2022).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7ec0
Carilli, C. L. et al. X-ray emission from the jets and lobes of the Spiderweb. Astrophys. J. 928, 59 (2022).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac55a0
Pratt, G. W. et al. The galaxy cluster mass scale and its impact on cosmological constraints from the cluster population. Space Sci. Rev. 215, 25 (2019).
doi: 10.1007/s11214-019-0591-0
Kurk, J. D., Pentericci, L., Röttgering, H. J. A. & Miley, G. K. A search for clusters at high redshift. III. Candidate Hα emitters and EROs in the PKS 1138–262 proto-cluster at z = 2.16. Astron. Astrophys. 428, 793–815 (2004).
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20040075
Kurk, J. D., Pentericci, L., Overzier, R. A., Röttgering, H. J. A. & Miley, G. K. A search for clusters at high redshift. IV. Spectroscopy of Hα emitters in a proto-cluster at z = 2.16. Astron. Astrophys. 428, 817–821 (2004).
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041819
Saro, A. et al. Simulating the formation of a protocluster at z ~ 2. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 392, 795–800 (2009).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14192.x
Kuiper, E. et al. A SINFONI view of flies in the Spiderweb: a galaxy cluster in the making. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 415, 2245–2256 (2011).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18852.x
Shimakawa, R. et al. Identification of the progenitors of rich clusters and member galaxies in rapid formation at z > 2. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 441, L1–L5 (2014).
doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slu029
Di Mascolo, L., Churazov, E. & Mroczkowski, T. A joint ALMA–Bolocam–Planck SZ study of the pressure distribution in RX J1347.5–1145. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 487, 4037–4056 (2019).
Planelles, S. et al. Pressure of the hot gas in simulations of galaxy clusters. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 467, 3827–3847 (2017).
doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx318
Bassini, L. et al. The DIANOGA simulations of galaxy clusters: characterising star formation in protoclusters. Astron. Astrophys. 642, A37 (2020).
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038396
Miley, G. K. et al. The Spiderweb galaxy: a forming massive cluster galaxy at z ~ 2. Astrophys. J. 650, L29–L32 (2006).
doi: 10.1086/508534
Pentericci, L. et al. A search for clusters at high redshift. II. A proto cluster around a radio galaxy at z = 2.16. Astron. Astrophys. 361, L25–L28 (2000).
Hatch, N. A., Overzier, R. A., Röttgering, H. J. A., Kurk, J. D. & Miley, G. K. Diffuse UV light associated with the Spiderweb Galaxy: evidence for in situ star formation outside galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 383, 931–942 (2008).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12626.x
Carilli, C. L. et al. An X-ray cluster at redshift 2.156? Astrophys. J. 494, L143–L146 (1998).
doi: 10.1086/311199
Tozzi, P. et al. The 700 ks Chandra Spiderweb Field. II. Evidence for inverse-Compton and thermal diffuse emission in the Spiderweb galaxy. Astron. Astrophys. 667, A134 (2022).
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244337
Remus, R.-S., Dolag, K. & Dannerbauer, H. The young and the wild: what happens to protoclusters forming at z = 4? Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.01053 (2022)
Tozzi, P. et al. The 700 ks Chandra Spiderweb Field. I. Evidence for widespread nuclear activity in the protocluster. Astron. Astrophys. 662, A54 (2022).
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142333
Overzier, R. A. et al. On the X-ray emission of z ~ 2 radio galaxies: IC scattering of the CMB and no evidence for fully-formed potential wells. Astron. Astrophys. 433, 87–100 (2005).
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041657
Champagne, J. B. et al. Comprehensive gas characterization of a z = 2.5 protocluster: a cluster core caught in the beginning of virialization? Astrophys. J. 913, 110 (2021).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf4e6
Arnaud, M. et al. The universal galaxy cluster pressure profile from a representative sample of nearby systems (REXCESS) and the Y
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913416
Le Brun, A. M. C., McCarthy, I. G. & Melin, J.-B. Testing Sunyaev–Zel’dovich measurements of the hot gas content of dark matter haloes using synthetic skies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 451, 3868–3881 (2015).
doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1172
Kurk, J. D. et al. A search for clusters at high redshift. I. Candidate Lyα emitters near 1138–262 at z = 2.2. Astron. Astrophys. 358, L1–L4 (2000).
Wootten, A. & Thompson, A. R. The Atacama Large Millimeter/Submillimeter Array. Proc. IEEE 97, 1463–1471 (2009).
doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2009.2020572
Iguchi, S. et al. The Atacama Compact Array (ACA). Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 61, 1–12 (2009).
doi: 10.1093/pasj/61.1.1
Emonts, B. H. C. et al. Giant galaxy growing from recycled gas: ALMA maps the circumgalactic molecular medium of the Spiderweb in [C I]. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. Lett. 477, L60–L65 (2018).
doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/sly034
Tadaki, K.-i. et al. Environmental impacts on molecular gas in protocluster galaxies at z ~ 2. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 71, 40 (2019).
doi: 10.1093/pasj/psz005
Jin, S. et al. COALAS. I. ATCA CO(1–0) survey and luminosity function in the Spiderweb protocluster at z = 2.16. Astron. Astrophys. 652, A11 (2021).
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202040232
McMullin, J. P., Waters, B., Schiebel, D., Youn, W. & Golap, K. CASA architecture and applications. ASP Conf. Ser. 376, 127 (2006).
Hatziminaoglou, E. et al. The European ALMA Regional Centre Network: a geographically distributed user support model. Messenger 162, 24–29 (2015).
Petry, D. et al. ALMA data quality assurance and the products it delivers – the contribution of the European ARC. Messenger 181, 16–20 (2020).
Di Mascolo, L. et al. An ALMA+ACA measurement of the shock in the Bullet Cluster. Astron. Astrophys. 628, A100 (2019).
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936184
Di Mascolo, L. et al. The massive and distant clusters of WISE Survey. SZ effect of verification with the Atacama Compact Array – Localization and Cluster Analysis. Astron. Astrophys. 638, A70 (2020).
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202037818
Di Mascolo, L. et al. Multiwavelength view of SPT-CL J2106-5844. The radio galaxies and the thermal and relativistic plasmas in a massive galaxy cluster merger at z ≃ 1.13. Astron. Astrophys. 650, A153 (2021).
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202040260
Barnett, A. H., Magland, J. & af Klinteberg, L. A parallel nonuniform fast Fourier transform library based on an “exponential of semicircle” kernel. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 41, C479–C504 (2019).
doi: 10.1137/18M120885X
Skilling, J. in Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Methods in Science and Engineering (eds Fischer, R., Dose, V., Preuss, R. & von Toussaint, U.) 395–405 (AIP, 2004).
Ashton, G. et al. Nested sampling for physical scientists. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 2, 39 (2022).
doi: 10.1038/s43586-022-00121-x
Speagle, J. S. DYNESTY: a dynamic nested sampling package for estimating Bayesian posteriors and evidences. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 493, 3132–3158 (2020).
doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa278
Bellman, R. & Kalaba, R. A mathematical theory of adaptive control processes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 45, 1288–1290 (1959).
pubmed: 16590506
pmcid: 222712
doi: 10.1073/pnas.45.8.1288
Pentericci, L. et al. HST images of the extremely clumpy radio galaxy 1138–262 at z = 2.2. Astrophys. J. 504, 139–146 (1998).
doi: 10.1086/306087
Carilli, C. L. et al. The X-ray-radio alignment in the z = 2.2 radio galaxy PKS 1138–262. Astrophys. J. 567, 781–789 (2002).
doi: 10.1086/338669
Shimakawa, R. et al. MAHALO Deep Cluster Survey II. Characterizing massive forming galaxies in the Spiderweb protocluster at z = 2.2. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 481, 5630–5650 (2018).
doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2618
Higson, E., Handley, W., Hobson, M. & Lasenby, A. Bayesian sparse reconstruction: a brute-force approach to astronomical imaging and machine learning. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 483, 4828–4846 (2019).
Handley, W. J., Hobson, M. P. & Lasenby, A. N. POLYCHORD: next-generation nested sampling. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 453, 4384–4398 (2015).
doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1911
Nagai, D., Kravtsov, A. V. & Vikhlinin, A. Effects of galaxy formation on thermodynamics of the intracluster medium. Astrophys. J. 668, 1–14 (2007).
doi: 10.1086/521328
Böhringer, H. et al. The representative XMM-Newton cluster structure survey (REXCESS) of an X-ray luminosity selected galaxy cluster sample. Astron. Astrophys. 469, 363–377 (2007).
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066740
McDonald, M. et al. The redshift evolution of the mean temperature, pressure, and entropy profiles in 80 SPT-selected galaxy clusters. Astrophys. J. 794, 67 (2014).
doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/794/1/67
Carlstrom, J. E. et al. The 10 meter South Pole Telescope. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 123, 568 (2011).
doi: 10.1086/659879
Bleem, L. E. et al. Galaxy clusters discovered via the Sunyaev–Zel’dovich effect in the 2500-square-degree SPT-SZ survey. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 216, 27 (2015).
doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/216/2/27
Bleem, L. E. et al. The SPTPoL extended cluster survey. Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 247, 25 (2020).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab6993
Le Brun, A. M. C., McCarthy, I. G., Schaye, J. & Ponman, T. J. Towards a realistic population of simulated galaxy groups and clusters. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 441, 1270–1290 (2014).
doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu608
Fabian, A. C. Observational evidence of active galactic nuclei feedback. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 50, 455–489 (2012).
doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125521
Harrison, C. M. Impact of supermassive black hole growth on star formation. Nat. Astron. 1, 0165 (2017).
doi: 10.1038/s41550-017-0165
Gupta, N., Saro, A., Mohr, J. J., Dolag, K. & Liu, J. SZE observables, pressure profiles and centre offsets in Magneticum simulation galaxy clusters. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 469, 3069–3087 (2017).
doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx715
Doherty, M. et al. Optical and near-IR spectroscopy of candidate red galaxies in two z ~ 2.5 proto-clusters. Astron. Astrophys. 509, A83 (2010).
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912868
Emonts, B. H. C. et al. Molecular gas in the halo fuels the growth of a massive cluster galaxy at high redshift. Science 354, 1128–1130 (2016).
pubmed: 27934760
doi: 10.1126/science.aag0512
Pérez-Martínez, J. M. et al. Signs of environmental effects on star-forming galaxies in the Spiderweb protocluster at z = 2.16. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 518, 1707–1734 (2023).
doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2784
Dannerbauer, H. et al. An excess of dusty starbursts related to the Spiderweb galaxy. Astron. Astrophys. 570, A55 (2014).
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423771
Dannerbauer, H. et al. The implications of the surprising existence of a large, massive CO disk in a distant protocluster. Astron. Astrophys. 608, A48 (2017).
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730449
Mantz, A. B. et al. The XXL Survey. XVII. X-ray and Sunyaev-Zel’dovich properties of the redshift 2.0 galaxy cluster XLSSC 122. Astron. Astrophys. 620, A2 (2018).
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201630096
Gobat, R. et al. Sunyaev-Zel’dovich detection of the galaxy cluster Cl J1449+0856 at z = 1.99: the pressure profile in uv space. Astron. Astrophys. 629, A104 (2019).
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935862
Saro, A., Mohr, J. J., Bazin, G. & Dolag, K. Toward unbiased galaxy cluster masses from line-of-sight velocity dispersions. Astrophys. J. 772, 47 (2013).
doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/772/1/47
Springel, V. et al. Simulations of the formation, evolution and clustering of galaxies and quasars. Nature 435, 629–636 (2005).
pubmed: 15931216
doi: 10.1038/nature03597
Ragagnin, A., Saro, A., Singh, P. & Dolag, K. Cosmology dependence of halo masses and concentrations in hydrodynamic simulations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 500, 5056–5071 (2021).
doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3523
Giocoli, C., Tormen, G. & van den Bosch, F. C. The population of dark matter subhaloes: mass functions and average mass-loss rates. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 386, 2135–2144 (2008).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13182.x
Feroz, F., Hobson, M. P. & Bridges, M. MULTINEST: an efficient and robust Bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 398, 1601–1614 (2009).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14548.x
Koposov, S. et al. joshspeagle/dynesty: v2.0.1. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7215695 (2022).
Hoeting, J. A., Madigan, D., Raftery, A. E. & Volinsky, C. T. Bayesian model averaging: a tutorial. Stat. Sci. 14, 382–401 (1999).
Fragoso, T. M., Bertoli, W. & Louzada, F. Bayesian model averaging: a systematic review and conceptual classification. Int. Stat. Rev. 86, 1–28 (2018).
doi: 10.1111/insr.12243
Poole, G. B. et al. The impact of mergers on relaxed X-ray clusters – II. Effects on global X-ray and Sunyaev-Zel’dovich properties and their scaling relations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 380, 437–454 (2007).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12107.x
Rasia, E. et al. Scaling relation in two situations of extreme mergers. Astrophys. J. 729, 45 (2011).
doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/729/1/45
Krause, E., Pierpaoli, E., Dolag, K. & Borgani, S. Merger-induced scatter and bias in the cluster mass–Sunyaev–Zel’dovich effect scaling relation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 419, 1766–1779 (2012).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19844.x
McDonald, M. et al. The remarkable similarity of massive galaxy clusters from z ~ 0 to z ~ 1.9. Astrophys. J. 843, 28 (2017).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7740
Thompson, A. R., Moran, J. M. & Swenson, G. W. J. Interferometry and Synthesis in Radio Astronomy 3rd edn (Springer, 2017).
Kitayama, T. et al. The Sunyaev–Zel’dovich effect at 5″: RX J1347.5–1145 imaged by ALMA. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 68, 88 (2016).
doi: 10.1093/pasj/psw082
Kitayama, T. et al. Deeply cooled core of the Phoenix galaxy cluster imaged by ALMA with the Sunyaev–Zel’dovich effect. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 72, 33 (2020).
doi: 10.1093/pasj/psaa009
Donoho, D. Compressed sensing. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 52, 1289–1306 (2006).
doi: 10.1109/TIT.2006.871582
Candès, E. J., Romberg, J. K. & Tao, T. Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 59, 1207–1223 (2006).
doi: 10.1002/cpa.20124
Wiaux, Y., Jacques, L., Puy, G., Scaife, A. M. M. & Vandergheynst, P. Compressed sensing imaging techniques for radio interferometry. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 395, 1733–1742 (2009).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14665.x
Bobin, J., Rapin, J., Larue, A. & Starck, J.-L. Sparsity and adaptivity for the blind separation of partially correlated sources. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 63, 1199–1213 (2015).
doi: 10.1109/TSP.2015.2391071
Jiang, M., Bobin, J. & Starck, J.-L. Joint multichannel deconvolution and blind source separation. SIAM J. Imaging Sci. 10, 1997–2021 (2017).
doi: 10.1137/16M1103713
Carrillo, R. E., McEwen, J. D. & Wiaux, Y. Sparsity Averaging Reweighted Analysis (SARA): a novel algorithm for radio-interferometric imaging. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 426, 1223–1234 (2012).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21605.x
Honma, M., Akiyama, K., Uemura, M. & Ikeda, S. Super-resolution imaging with radio interferometry using sparse modeling. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 66, 95 (2014).
doi: 10.1093/pasj/psu070
Akiyama, K. et al. Superresolution full-polarimetric imaging for radio interferometry with sparse modeling. Astron. J. 153, 159 (2017).
doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa6302
Chael, A. A. et al. Interferometric imaging directly with closure phases and closure amplitudes. Astrophys. J. 857, 23 (2018).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aab6a8
Cavaliere, A. & Fusco-Femiano, R. X-rays from hot plasma in clusters of galaxies. Astron. Astrophys. 49, 137–144 (1976).
Huang, N. et al. Galaxy clusters selected via the Sunyaev–Zel’dovich effect in the SPTpol 100-square-degree survey. Astron. J. 159, 110 (2020).
doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab6a96
Nesterov, Y. Efficiency of coordinate descent methods on huge-scale optimization problems. SIAM J. Optim. 22, 341–362 (2012).
doi: 10.1137/100802001
Auslender, A. Asymptotic properties of the Fenchel dual functional and applications to decomposition problems. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 73, 427–449 (1992).
doi: 10.1007/BF00940050
Grippo, L. & Sciandrone, M. On the convergence of the block nonlinear Gauss–Seidel method under convex constraints. Oper. Res. Lett. 26, 127–136 (2000).
doi: 10.1016/S0167-6377(99)00074-7
Razaviyayn, M., Hong, M. & Luo, Z.-Q. A unified convergence analysis of block successive minimization methods for nonsmooth optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 23, 1126–1153 (2013).
doi: 10.1137/120891009
Byrd, R. H., Lu, P., Nocedal, J. & Zhu, C. A limited memory algorithm for bound constrained optimization. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 16, 1190–1208 (1995).
doi: 10.1137/0916069
Zhu, C., Byrd, R. H., Lu, P. & Nocedal, J. Algorithm 778: L-BFGS-B: Fortran subroutines for large-scale bound-constrained optimization. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 23, 550–560 (1997).
doi: 10.1145/279232.279236
Virtanen, P. et al. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python. Nat. Methods 17, 261–272 (2020).
pubmed: 32015543
pmcid: 7056644
doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2
Luo, Z. Q. & Tseng, P. On the convergence of the coordinate descent method for convex differentiable minimization. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 72, 7–35 (1992).
doi: 10.1007/BF00939948
Nutini, J., Schmidt, M., Laradji, I. H., Friedlander, M. & Koepke, H. in Proc. 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning Vol. 37 (eds Bach, F. & Blei, D.) 1632–1641 (PMLR, 2015).
Tibshirani, R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J. R. Stat. Soc. B Stat. Methodol. 58, 267–288 (1996).
Candès, E. J., Wakin, M. B. & Boyd, S. P. Enhancing sparsity by reweighted ℓ
doi: 10.1007/s00041-008-9045-x
Garsden, H. et al. LOFAR sparse image reconstruction. Astron. Astrophys. 575, A90 (2015).
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424504
Kuramochi, K. et al. Superresolution interferometric imaging with sparse modeling using total squared variation: application to imaging the black hole shadow. Astrophys. J. 858, 56 (2018).
doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aab6b5
Starck, J.-L., Fadili, J. & Murtagh, F. The undecimated wavelet decomposition and its reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 16, 297–309 (2007).
pubmed: 17269625
doi: 10.1109/TIP.2006.887733
Li, F., Cornwell, T. J. & de Hoog, F. The application of compressive sampling to radio astronomy. I. Deconvolution. Astron. Astrophys. 528, A31 (2011).
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015045
Dabbech, A. et al. MORESANE: MOdel REconstruction by Synthesis-ANalysis Estimators. A sparse deconvolution algorithm for radio interferometric imaging. Astron. Astrophys. 576, A7 (2015).
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424602
Lovisari, L., Ettori, S., Gaspari, M. & Giles, P. A. Scaling properties of galaxy groups. Universe 7, 139 (2021).
doi: 10.3390/universe7050139
Eisenhauer, F. et al. SINFONI - integral field spectroscopy at 50 milli-arcsecond resolution with the ESO VLT. Proc. SPIE 4842, 1548–1561 (2003).
doi: 10.1117/12.459468
McNamara, B. R. & Nulsen, P. E. J. Mechanical feedback from active galactic nuclei in galaxies, groups and clusters. New J. Phys. 14, 055023 (2012).
doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/14/5/055023
De Breuck, C. et al. Feeding the spider with carbon. [CII] emission from the circumgalactic medium and active galactic nucleus. Astron. Astrophys. 658, L2 (2022).
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141853
Emonts, B. H. C. et al. CO(1–0) detection of molecular gas in the massive Spiderweb Galaxy (z = 2). Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 430, 3465–3471 (2013).
doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt147
Gaibler, V., Krause, M. & Camenzind, M. Very light magnetized jets on large scales – I. Evolution and magnetic fields. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 400, 1785–1802 (2009).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15625.x
Gullberg, B. et al. ALMA finds dew drops in the dusty spider’s web. Astron. Astrophys. 591, A73 (2016).
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527647
Beck, A. M. et al. An improved SPH scheme for cosmological simulations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 455, 2110–2130 (2016).
doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2443
Dolag, K., Hansen, F. K., Roncarelli, M. & Moscardini, L. The imprints of local superclusters on the Sunyaev-Zel’dovich signals and their detectability with Planck. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 363, 29–39 (2005).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09452.x
Harris, C. R. et al. Array programming with NumPy. Nature 585, 357–362 (2020).
pubmed: 32939066
pmcid: 7759461
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2
Hunter, J. D. Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment. Comput. Sci. Eng. 9, 90–95 (2007).
doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55
Robitaille, T. & Bressert, E. APLpy: Astronomical Plotting Library in Python. Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1208.017 (2012).
Robitaille, T. APLpy v2.0: The Astronomical Plotting Library in Python. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2567476 (2019).
The Astropy Collaboration. Astropy: a community Python package for astronomy. Astron. Astrophys. 558, A33 (2013).
doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068
The Astropy Collaboration. The Astropy Project: building an open-science project and status of the v2.0 core package. Astron. J. 156, 123 (2018).
doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f
Bradbury, J. et al. JAX: composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs version 0.2.5. http://github.com/google/jax (2018).
Appenzeller, I. et al. Successful commissioning of FORS1 – the first optical instrument on the VLT. Messenger 94, 1–6 (1998).