Multimodal deep learning to predict prognosis in adult and pediatric brain tumors.


Journal

Communications medicine
ISSN: 2730-664X
Titre abrégé: Commun Med (Lond)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9918250414506676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 Mar 2023
Historique:
received: 16 12 2021
accepted: 14 03 2023
medline: 30 3 2023
entrez: 29 3 2023
pubmed: 30 3 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The introduction of deep learning in both imaging and genomics has significantly advanced the analysis of biomedical data. For complex diseases such as cancer, different data modalities may reveal different disease characteristics, and the integration of imaging with genomic data has the potential to unravel additional information than when using these data sources in isolation. Here, we propose a DL framework that combines these two modalities with the aim to predict brain tumor prognosis. Using two separate glioma cohorts of 783 adults and 305 pediatric patients we developed a DL framework that can fuse histopathology images with gene expression profiles. Three strategies for data fusion were implemented and compared: early, late, and joint fusion. Additional validation of the adult glioma models was done on an independent cohort of 97 adult patients. Here we show that the developed multimodal data models achieve better prediction results compared to the single data models, but also lead to the identification of more relevant biological pathways. When testing our adult models on a third brain tumor dataset, we show our multimodal framework is able to generalize and performs better on new data from different cohorts. Leveraging the concept of transfer learning, we demonstrate how our pediatric multimodal models can be used to predict prognosis for two more rare (less available samples) pediatric brain tumors. Our study illustrates that a multimodal data fusion approach can be successfully implemented and customized to model clinical outcome of adult and pediatric brain tumors. An increasing amount of complex patient data is generated when treating patients with cancer, including histopathology data (where the appearance of a tumor is examined under a microscope) and molecular data (such as analysis of a tumor’s genetic material). Computational methods to integrate these data types might help us to predict outcomes in patients with cancer. Here, we propose a deep learning method which involves computer software learning from patterns in the data, to combine histopathology and molecular data to predict outcomes in patients with brain cancers. Using three cohorts of patients, we show that our method combining the different datasets performs better than models using one data type. Methods like ours might help clinicians to better inform patients about their prognosis and make decisions about their care.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The introduction of deep learning in both imaging and genomics has significantly advanced the analysis of biomedical data. For complex diseases such as cancer, different data modalities may reveal different disease characteristics, and the integration of imaging with genomic data has the potential to unravel additional information than when using these data sources in isolation. Here, we propose a DL framework that combines these two modalities with the aim to predict brain tumor prognosis.
METHODS METHODS
Using two separate glioma cohorts of 783 adults and 305 pediatric patients we developed a DL framework that can fuse histopathology images with gene expression profiles. Three strategies for data fusion were implemented and compared: early, late, and joint fusion. Additional validation of the adult glioma models was done on an independent cohort of 97 adult patients.
RESULTS RESULTS
Here we show that the developed multimodal data models achieve better prediction results compared to the single data models, but also lead to the identification of more relevant biological pathways. When testing our adult models on a third brain tumor dataset, we show our multimodal framework is able to generalize and performs better on new data from different cohorts. Leveraging the concept of transfer learning, we demonstrate how our pediatric multimodal models can be used to predict prognosis for two more rare (less available samples) pediatric brain tumors.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Our study illustrates that a multimodal data fusion approach can be successfully implemented and customized to model clinical outcome of adult and pediatric brain tumors.
An increasing amount of complex patient data is generated when treating patients with cancer, including histopathology data (where the appearance of a tumor is examined under a microscope) and molecular data (such as analysis of a tumor’s genetic material). Computational methods to integrate these data types might help us to predict outcomes in patients with cancer. Here, we propose a deep learning method which involves computer software learning from patterns in the data, to combine histopathology and molecular data to predict outcomes in patients with brain cancers. Using three cohorts of patients, we show that our method combining the different datasets performs better than models using one data type. Methods like ours might help clinicians to better inform patients about their prognosis and make decisions about their care.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
An increasing amount of complex patient data is generated when treating patients with cancer, including histopathology data (where the appearance of a tumor is examined under a microscope) and molecular data (such as analysis of a tumor’s genetic material). Computational methods to integrate these data types might help us to predict outcomes in patients with cancer. Here, we propose a deep learning method which involves computer software learning from patterns in the data, to combine histopathology and molecular data to predict outcomes in patients with brain cancers. Using three cohorts of patients, we show that our method combining the different datasets performs better than models using one data type. Methods like ours might help clinicians to better inform patients about their prognosis and make decisions about their care.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36991216
doi: 10.1038/s43856-023-00276-y
pii: 10.1038/s43856-023-00276-y
pmc: PMC10060397
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

44

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA260271
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Trends Cancer. 2016 Oct;2(10):606-618
pubmed: 27917404
JAMA. 1982 May 14;247(18):2543-6
pubmed: 7069920
J Pathol Inform. 2013 Sep 27;4:27
pubmed: 24244884
J Neurosci Res. 2008 Aug 15;86(11):2450-61
pubmed: 18438928
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Feb 12;13(4):
pubmed: 33673070
Front Neurosci. 2019 Aug 16;13:810
pubmed: 31474816
J Neurooncol. 2018 Oct;140(1):15-26
pubmed: 29916101
J Biomed Inform. 2020 Aug;108:103496
pubmed: 32652236
Stat Med. 1999 Sep 15-30;18(17-18):2529-45
pubmed: 10474158
Acta Neuropathol. 2016 Jun;131(6):803-20
pubmed: 27157931
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Mar 05;12(3):
pubmed: 32150991
J Big Data. 2021;8(1):53
pubmed: 33816053
Br J Cancer. 2003 Aug 4;89(3):431-6
pubmed: 12888808
Front Oncol. 2020 Mar 13;10:310
pubmed: 32232001
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2020 Oct;12265:362-371
pubmed: 33458721
Br J Cancer. 2014 May 13;110(10):2560-8
pubmed: 24691423
NAR Genom Bioinform. 2021 Mar 22;3(1):lqab015
pubmed: 33778491
Med Image Anal. 2019 Dec;58:101544
pubmed: 31466046
Heliyon. 2019 Dec 05;5(12):e02826
pubmed: 31867451
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2022 Apr;41(4):757-770
pubmed: 32881682
Nucleic Acids Res. 2022 Jan 7;50(D1):D687-D692
pubmed: 34788843
Neurosurgery. 2017 Sep 1;64(CN_suppl_1):134-138
pubmed: 28899049
Br J Cancer. 2021 Feb;124(4):686-696
pubmed: 33204028
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jul 20;35(21):2370-2377
pubmed: 28640698
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 27;115(13):E2970-E2979
pubmed: 29531073
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Dec;108:1-8
pubmed: 29132615
Biol Direct. 2019 Feb 13;14(1):4
pubmed: 30760313
Neuro Oncol. 2020 Jan 11;22(1):163-165
pubmed: 31613963
Front Oncol. 2021 Nov 24;11:788740
pubmed: 34900744
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. ;18(1):3-9
pubmed: 28239999
Med Image Anal. 2019 Dec;58:101563
pubmed: 31561183
Nature. 2018 Mar 22;555(7697):469-474
pubmed: 29539639
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2017 Nov 17;3:45
pubmed: 29167821
Cell. 2018 Apr 5;173(2):283-285
pubmed: 29625045
Cell Syst. 2015 Dec 23;1(6):417-425
pubmed: 26771021
Cancer Chemother Rep. 1966 Mar;50(3):163-70
pubmed: 5910392
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jan 08;12(1):
pubmed: 31936239
Cell. 2016 Jan 28;164(3):550-63
pubmed: 26824661
Nat Rev Cancer. 2021 Mar;21(3):199-211
pubmed: 33514930
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 23;11(1):18897
pubmed: 34556677
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Aug 03;11(8):
pubmed: 34441338
Nat Genet. 2013 Oct;45(10):1113-20
pubmed: 24071849
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010 Sep;143(3):331-6
pubmed: 20723767
Bioinformatics. 2011 Nov 15;27(22):3206-8
pubmed: 21903630
Nat Cancer. 2020 Aug;1(8):800-810
pubmed: 35122049
BMC Med Imaging. 2022 Apr 13;22(1):69
pubmed: 35418051
Front Genet. 2019 Mar 08;10:166
pubmed: 30906311
Leukemia. 2022 Jul;36(7):1769-1780
pubmed: 35490198
Cancer Res. 2017 Nov 1;77(21):e91-e100
pubmed: 29092949
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Feb 26;18(1):24
pubmed: 29482517
NAR Genom Bioinform. 2020 Sep;2(3):lqaa078
pubmed: 33015620
PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 Apr 10;14(4):e1006076
pubmed: 29634719

Auteurs

Sandra Steyaert (S)

Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research (BMIR), Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Yeping Lina Qiu (YL)

Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research (BMIR), Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Yuanning Zheng (Y)

Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research (BMIR), Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Pritam Mukherjee (P)

Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research (BMIR), Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Hannes Vogel (H)

Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

Olivier Gevaert (O)

Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research (BMIR), Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. ogevaert@stanford.edu.
Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. ogevaert@stanford.edu.

Classifications MeSH