Homeowner perspectives on the implementation of the Community Homes for Opportunity (CHO) program: an ethnographic group homes study in Southwestern Ontario Canada.

Humans Ontario Group Homes Housing Home Care Services Qualitative Research
Autonomy CHO Community integration HSC Homeowners Housing Recovery Supportive housing

Journal

BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
29 03 2023
Historique:
received: 09 03 2022
accepted: 23 03 2023
medline: 31 3 2023
entrez: 29 3 2023
pubmed: 30 3 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The global extant literature acknowledge that housing serves as a key social determinant of health. Housing interventions that involve group homes have been found to support the recovery of persons with mental illness and those with addiction issues. The current study explored the views of homeowners in relation to a supportive housing program called Community Homes for Opportunity (CHO) that modernised a provincial group home program (Homes for Special Care [HSC]) and provided recommendations for improving the program implementation in other geographical areas of Ontario. We applied ethnographic qualitative techniques to purposefully recruit 36 homeowner participants from 28 group homes in Southwest Ontario, Ontario Canada. Focus group discussions were conducted at two time points, during CHO program implementation (Fall 2018, and post implementation phases (Winter 2019) respectively. Data analysis yielded 5 major themes. These include: (1) general impressions about the modernization process, (2) perceived social, economic and health outcomes, (3) enablers of the modernization program, (4) challenges to implementation of the modernization program, and (5) suggestions for implementation of the CHO in future. A more effective and expanded CHO program will need the effective collaboration of all stakeholders including homeowners for successful implementation.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
The global extant literature acknowledge that housing serves as a key social determinant of health. Housing interventions that involve group homes have been found to support the recovery of persons with mental illness and those with addiction issues. The current study explored the views of homeowners in relation to a supportive housing program called Community Homes for Opportunity (CHO) that modernised a provincial group home program (Homes for Special Care [HSC]) and provided recommendations for improving the program implementation in other geographical areas of Ontario.
METHODS
We applied ethnographic qualitative techniques to purposefully recruit 36 homeowner participants from 28 group homes in Southwest Ontario, Ontario Canada. Focus group discussions were conducted at two time points, during CHO program implementation (Fall 2018, and post implementation phases (Winter 2019) respectively.
RESULTS
Data analysis yielded 5 major themes. These include: (1) general impressions about the modernization process, (2) perceived social, economic and health outcomes, (3) enablers of the modernization program, (4) challenges to implementation of the modernization program, and (5) suggestions for implementation of the CHO in future.
CONCLUSIONS
A more effective and expanded CHO program will need the effective collaboration of all stakeholders including homeowners for successful implementation.

Identifiants

DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-15512-2 PMID: 36991379 PMC: PMC10053089
pubmed: 36991379
doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15512-2
pii: 10.1186/s12889-023-15512-2
pmc: PMC10053089
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

585

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Front Psychiatry. 2019 Nov 22;10:862
pubmed: 31849724
J Soc Social Work Res. 2016 Fall;7(3):507-525
pubmed: 28163830
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2015 Oct;31(5):294-302
pubmed: 26279390
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Mar 20;18(1):190
pubmed: 29558927
Drugs Alcohol Today. 2017;17(3):157-167
pubmed: 29057007
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2018 Jan;45(1):152-162
pubmed: 27900616
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2007 Fall;31(2):115-24
pubmed: 18018955
BMC Public Health. 2011 Aug 10;11:638
pubmed: 21831318
Am J Public Health. 2002 May;92(5):758-68
pubmed: 11988443
BMJ Open. 2011 Nov 14;1(2):e000323
pubmed: 22102645
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jul 20;20(1):1138
pubmed: 32689966
BMC Public Health. 2020 Feb 4;20(1):174
pubmed: 32019535
Health Soc Care Community. 2018 Jan;26(1):e31-e38
pubmed: 28627076
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 09;9(4):e94207
pubmed: 24718585
CMAJ. 2020 Mar 9;192(10):E240-E254
pubmed: 32152052
Front Public Health. 2016 May 30;4:109
pubmed: 27303662
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 29;22(1):614
pubmed: 35351039
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Dec 20;10:850
pubmed: 31992994
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2016 Oct 14;9:537-546
pubmed: 27789958
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2020 Mar 13;14:18
pubmed: 32190106
Can J Nurs Res. 2019 Dec;51(4):264-273
pubmed: 30871371
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:289731
pubmed: 25101268

Auteurs

Cheryl Forchuk (C)

Beryl and Richard Ivey Research Chair in Aging, Mental Health, Rehabilitation and Recovery, Lawson Health Research Institute, Arthur Labatt School of Nursing, Western University London, Parkwood Institute Mental Health Care Building, 550 Wellington Road, Suite B3-110, P.O. Box 5777, London, STN B, N6A 4V2, Canada. cforchuk@uwo.ca.

Sebastian Gyamfi (S)

Lawson Health Research Institute, Arthur Labatt School of Nursing, Parkwood Research Institute, Western University, London, Canada.

Heba Hassan (H)

Lawson Health Research Institute, Parkwood Research Institute, London, ON, Canada.

Bryanna Lucyk (B)

Lawson Health Research Institute, Parkwood Research Institute, London, ON, Canada.

Richard Booth (R)

Lawson Health Research Institute, Arthur Labatt School of Nursing, Western University, London, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female

Evaluation of Low-Value Services Across Major Medicare Advantage Insurers and Traditional Medicare.

Ciara Duggan, Adam L Beckman, Ishani Ganguli et al.
1.00
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C

Effectiveness of Virtual Yoga for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Hallie Tankha, Devyn Gaskins, Amanda Shallcross et al.
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH

questionsmedicales.fr › Eucaryotes › Animaux › Chordés › Vertébrés › Mammifères › Eutheria › Primates › Haplorhini › Catarrhini › Hominidae › Humains › Homeowner perspectives on the implementation...
questionsmedicales.fr › Régions géographiques › Amériques › Amérique du Nord › Canada › Ontario › Homeowner perspectives on the implementation...
questionsmedicales.fr › Établissements, main d'oeuvre et services de soins de santé › Établissements de santé › Établissements de soins de long séjour › Foyers collectifs › Homeowner perspectives on the implementation...
questionsmedicales.fr › Environnement et santé publique › Santé publique › Mesures épidémiologiques › Démographie › Caractéristiques de l'habitat › Logement › Homeowner perspectives on the implementation...
questionsmedicales.fr › Établissements, main d'oeuvre et services de soins de santé › Services de santé › Services de soins infirmiers › Services de soins à domicile › Homeowner perspectives on the implementation...
questionsmedicales.fr › Disciplines des sciences naturelles › Science › Recherche › Recherche empirique › Recherche qualitative › Homeowner perspectives on the implementation...