The r'-Wave Algorithm: A New Diagnostic Tool to Predict the Diagnosis of Brugada Syndrome after a Sodium Channel Blocker Provocation Test.
Brugada syndrome
electrocardiogram
r’-wave
r’-wave algorithm
α-angle
β-angle
Journal
Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1424-8220
Titre abrégé: Sensors (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101204366
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Mar 2023
16 Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
23
02
2023
revised:
10
03
2023
accepted:
13
03
2023
medline:
31
3
2023
entrez:
30
3
2023
pubmed:
31
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A diagnosis of Brugada syndrome (BrS) is based on the presence of a type 1 electrocardiogram (ECG) pattern, either spontaneously or after a Sodium Channel Blocker Provocation Test (SCBPT). Several ECG criteria have been evaluated as predictors of a positive SCBPT, such as the β-angle, the α-angle, the duration of the base of the triangle at 5 mm from the r'-wave (DBT- 5 mm), the duration of the base of the triangle at the isoelectric line (DBT- iso), and the triangle base/height ratio. The aim of our study was to test all previously proposed ECG criteria in a large cohort study and to evaluate an r'-wave algorithm for predicting a BrS diagnosis after an SCBPT. We enrolled all patients who consecutively underwent SCBPT using flecainide from January 2010 to December 2015 in the test cohort and from January 2016 to December 2021 in the validation cohort. We included the ECG criteria with the best diagnostic accuracy in relation to the test cohort in the development of the r'-wave algorithm (β-angle, α-angle, DBT- 5 mm, and DBT- iso.) Of the total of 395 patients enrolled, 72.4% were male and the average age was 44.7 ± 13.5 years. Following the SCBPTs, 24.1% of patients (n = 95) were positive and 75.9% (n = 300) were negative. ROC analysis of the validation cohort showed that the AUC of the r'-wave algorithm (AUC: 0.92; CI 0.85-0.99) was significantly better than the AUC of the β-angle (AUC: 0.82; 95% CI 0.71-0.92), the α-angle (AUC: 0.77; 95% CI 0.66-0.90), the DBT- 5 mm (AUC: 0.75; 95% CI 0.64-0.87), the DBT- iso (AUC: 0.79; 95% CI 0.67-0.91), and the triangle base/height (AUC: 0.61; 95% CI 0.48-0.75) (
Identifiants
pubmed: 36991870
pii: s23063159
doi: 10.3390/s23063159
pmc: PMC10056571
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Sodium Channel Blockers
0
Flecainide
K94FTS1806
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Aug 28;72(9):1046-1059
pubmed: 30139433
Heart Rhythm. 2018 May;15(5):716-724
pubmed: 29325976
Heart Rhythm. 2017 Oct;14(10):1442-1448
pubmed: 28666944
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Nov 22;58(22):2290-8
pubmed: 22093505
J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2010 Oct;49(4):543-53
pubmed: 20659475
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Dec 14;56(25):2143-5
pubmed: 21144977
Europace. 2014 Nov;16(11):1639-45
pubmed: 24603955
Europace. 2021 Dec 7;23(12):2020-2028
pubmed: 34125232
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Nov 15;20(6):1391-6
pubmed: 1309182
Biometrics. 1988 Sep;44(3):837-45
pubmed: 3203132
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2012 Oct;17(4):299-314
pubmed: 23094876
J Electrocardiol. 2016 Mar-Apr;49(2):187-91
pubmed: 26851992
Int Heart J. 2011;52(3):159-63
pubmed: 21646738
Europace. 2017 Apr 1;19(4):665-694
pubmed: 28431071
Minerva Cardiol Angiol. 2021 Aug;69(4):429-434
pubmed: 32657559