Automated Monitoring of Adherence to Evidenced-Based Clinical Guideline Recommendations: Design and Implementation Study.
COVID-19
clinical
clinical decision support
clinical guideline recommendations
computer-interpretable guidelines
data
evidence-based medicine
monitoring
patient
prototype
system
utility
Journal
Journal of medical Internet research
ISSN: 1438-8871
Titre abrégé: J Med Internet Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 100959882
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 05 2023
04 05 2023
Historique:
received:
19
07
2022
accepted:
08
03
2023
revised:
26
01
2023
medline:
8
5
2023
pubmed:
31
3
2023
entrez:
30
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Clinical practice guidelines are systematically developed statements intended to optimize patient care. However, a gapless implementation of guideline recommendations requires health care personnel not only to be aware of the recommendations and to support their content but also to recognize every situation in which they are applicable. To not miss situations in which recommendations should be applied, computerized clinical decision support can be provided through a system that allows an automated monitoring of adherence to clinical guideline recommendations in individual patients. This study aims to collect and analyze the requirements for a system that allows the monitoring of adherence to evidence-based clinical guideline recommendations in individual patients and, based on these requirements, to design and implement a software prototype that integrates guideline recommendations with individual patient data, and to demonstrate the prototype's utility in treatment recommendations. We performed a work process analysis with experienced intensive care clinicians to develop a conceptual model of how to support guideline adherence monitoring in clinical routine and identified which steps in the model could be supported electronically. We then identified the core requirements of a software system to support recommendation adherence monitoring in a consensus-based requirements analysis within the loosely structured focus group work of key stakeholders (clinicians, guideline developers, health data engineers, and software developers). On the basis of these requirements, we designed and implemented a modular system architecture. To demonstrate its utility, we applied the prototype to monitor adherence to a COVID-19 treatment recommendation using clinical data from a large European university hospital. We designed a system that integrates guideline recommendations with real-time clinical data to evaluate individual guideline recommendation adherence and developed a functional prototype. The needs analysis with clinical staff resulted in a flowchart describing the work process of how adherence to recommendations should be monitored. Four core requirements were identified: the ability to decide whether a recommendation is applicable and implemented for a specific patient, the ability to integrate clinical data from different data formats and data structures, the ability to display raw patient data, and the use of a Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources-based format for the representation of clinical practice guidelines to provide an interoperable, standards-based guideline recommendation exchange format. Our system has advantages in terms of individual patient treatment and quality management in hospitals. However, further studies are needed to measure its impact on patient outcomes and evaluate its resource effectiveness in different clinical settings. We specified a modular software architecture that allows experts from different fields to work independently and focus on their area of expertise. We have released the source code of our system under an open-source license and invite for collaborative further development of the system.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Clinical practice guidelines are systematically developed statements intended to optimize patient care. However, a gapless implementation of guideline recommendations requires health care personnel not only to be aware of the recommendations and to support their content but also to recognize every situation in which they are applicable. To not miss situations in which recommendations should be applied, computerized clinical decision support can be provided through a system that allows an automated monitoring of adherence to clinical guideline recommendations in individual patients.
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to collect and analyze the requirements for a system that allows the monitoring of adherence to evidence-based clinical guideline recommendations in individual patients and, based on these requirements, to design and implement a software prototype that integrates guideline recommendations with individual patient data, and to demonstrate the prototype's utility in treatment recommendations.
METHODS
We performed a work process analysis with experienced intensive care clinicians to develop a conceptual model of how to support guideline adherence monitoring in clinical routine and identified which steps in the model could be supported electronically. We then identified the core requirements of a software system to support recommendation adherence monitoring in a consensus-based requirements analysis within the loosely structured focus group work of key stakeholders (clinicians, guideline developers, health data engineers, and software developers). On the basis of these requirements, we designed and implemented a modular system architecture. To demonstrate its utility, we applied the prototype to monitor adherence to a COVID-19 treatment recommendation using clinical data from a large European university hospital.
RESULTS
We designed a system that integrates guideline recommendations with real-time clinical data to evaluate individual guideline recommendation adherence and developed a functional prototype. The needs analysis with clinical staff resulted in a flowchart describing the work process of how adherence to recommendations should be monitored. Four core requirements were identified: the ability to decide whether a recommendation is applicable and implemented for a specific patient, the ability to integrate clinical data from different data formats and data structures, the ability to display raw patient data, and the use of a Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources-based format for the representation of clinical practice guidelines to provide an interoperable, standards-based guideline recommendation exchange format.
CONCLUSIONS
Our system has advantages in terms of individual patient treatment and quality management in hospitals. However, further studies are needed to measure its impact on patient outcomes and evaluate its resource effectiveness in different clinical settings. We specified a modular software architecture that allows experts from different fields to work independently and focus on their area of expertise. We have released the source code of our system under an open-source license and invite for collaborative further development of the system.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36996044
pii: v25i1e41177
doi: 10.2196/41177
pmc: PMC10162484
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e41177Informations de copyright
©Gregor Lichtner, Claudia Spies, Carlo Jurth, Thomas Bienert, Anika Mueller, Oliver Kumpf, Vanessa Piechotta, Nicole Skoetz, Monika Nothacker, Martin Boeker, Joerg J Meerpohl, Falk von Dincklage. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 04.05.2023.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 25;384(8):693-704
pubmed: 32678530
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 May;9(5):e47-e48
pubmed: 33684356
Int J Med Inform. 2002 Dec 18;68(1-3):49-57
pubmed: 12467790
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Feb 6;3:17
pubmed: 32047862
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2001;84(Pt 1):280-4
pubmed: 11604749
Int J Med Inform. 2008 Dec;77(12):787-808
pubmed: 18639485
Pneumologie. 2020 Jun;74(6):358-365
pubmed: 32294763
J Biomed Inform. 2013 Aug;46(4):744-63
pubmed: 23806274
Artif Intell Med. 2019 Sep;100:101713
pubmed: 31607346
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Jan 1;193(1):17-22
pubmed: 26393290
JAMA. 2019 Aug 27;322(8):725-726
pubmed: 31322650
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021 Jan 11;118(Forthcoming):
pubmed: 33531113
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Sep-Oct;14(5):589-98
pubmed: 17600098
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Jan 04;10:2
pubmed: 20047686
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2007 Oct 11;:26-30
pubmed: 18693791
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2007 Jun 15;7:16
pubmed: 17573961
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;235:271-275
pubmed: 28423796
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;135:125-135
pubmed: 33691153
Healthcare (Basel). 2016 Jun 29;4(3):
pubmed: 27417624
Chest. 2013 Aug;144(2):381-389
pubmed: 23918106
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Dec 21;20(1):341
pubmed: 33349259
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Sep;23(5):899-908
pubmed: 26911829
Yearb Med Inform. 2017 Aug;26(1):53-58
pubmed: 28480476
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999 Mar-Apr;6(2):104-14
pubmed: 10094063
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 Dec;16(12):1463-1472
pubmed: 31774323
JAMA. 1999 Oct 20;282(15):1458-65
pubmed: 10535437
Crit Care. 2015 Apr 09;19:157
pubmed: 25888230
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Jun;47(6):713-715
pubmed: 33774712
Int J Med Inform. 2013 Oct;82(10):911-21
pubmed: 23827767
J Biomed Inform. 2004 Jun;37(3):147-61
pubmed: 15196480
J Biomed Inform. 2023 Mar;139:104305
pubmed: 36738871
Int J Med Inform. 2005 Aug;74(7-8):553-62
pubmed: 16043084
Crit Care Med. 2019 Mar;47(3):419-427
pubmed: 30608279
J Biomed Inform. 2012 Aug;45(4):711-8
pubmed: 22342733
Ger Med Sci. 2020 Oct 30;18:Doc09
pubmed: 33214791
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Jul;44(7):1189-1191
pubmed: 29564478
Infection. 2022 Feb;50(1):93-106
pubmed: 34228347
Curr Opin Oncol. 2023 Jan 1;35(1):68-77
pubmed: 36367223
Clin Chem. 2003 Apr;49(4):624-33
pubmed: 12651816
Lancet. 2017 Jul 22;390(10092):415-423
pubmed: 28215660
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 06;7:CD001175
pubmed: 28681432
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2020 Jul;27(2):
pubmed: 32723852