Feasibility and acceptability of at-home play kits for middle school physical activity promotion during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Pandemic
Phyiscal activity
Play kits
Program development
School
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 03 2023
30 03 2023
Historique:
received:
12
09
2022
accepted:
28
02
2023
medline:
3
4
2023
entrez:
30
3
2023
pubmed:
31
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Schools are central to providing opportunities for youth physical activity (PA), however such opportunities were limited during the COVID-19 pandemic. Identifying feasible, acceptable, and effective approaches for school-based PA promotion amid pandemic-related barriers can inform resource allocation efforts in future circumstances necessitating remote instruction. The aims of this study were to: (1) describe the pragmatic, stakeholder-engaged and theory-informed approach employed to adapt one school's PA promotion efforts to pandemic restrictions, leading to the creation of at-home "play kits" for students, and (2) assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of this intervention. Intervention activities occurred in one middle school (enrollment: 847) located in a Federal Opportunity Zone in the Seattle, WA area, with control data from a nearby middle school (enrollment: 640). Students at the intervention school were eligible to receive a play kit during the quarter they were enrolled in physical education (PE) class. Student surveys were completed across the school year (n = 1076), with a primary outcome of days/week that the student engaged in ≥ 60 min of PA. Qualitative interviews (n = 25) were conducted with students, staff, parents, and community partners, and focused on play kit acceptability and feasibility. During remote learning play kits were received by 58% of eligible students. Among students at the intervention school only, students actively enrolled in PE (versus not enrolled) reported significantly more days with ≥ 60 min of PA in the previous week, however the comparison between schools was not statistically significant. In qualitative interviews, most students reported the play kit motivated them to participate in PA, gave them activity ideas, and made virtual PE more enjoyable. Student-reported barriers to using play kits included space (indoors and outdoors), requirements to be quiet at home, necessary but unavailable adult supervision, lack of companions to play outdoors, and inclement weather. A pre-existing community organization-school partnership lent itself to a rapid response to meet student needs at a time when school staff and resources were highly constrained. The intervention developed through this collaborative response-play kits-has potential to support middle school PA during future pandemics or other conditions that necessitate remote schooling, however modifications to the intervention concept and implementation strategy may be needed to improve reach and effectiveness.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Schools are central to providing opportunities for youth physical activity (PA), however such opportunities were limited during the COVID-19 pandemic. Identifying feasible, acceptable, and effective approaches for school-based PA promotion amid pandemic-related barriers can inform resource allocation efforts in future circumstances necessitating remote instruction. The aims of this study were to: (1) describe the pragmatic, stakeholder-engaged and theory-informed approach employed to adapt one school's PA promotion efforts to pandemic restrictions, leading to the creation of at-home "play kits" for students, and (2) assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of this intervention.
METHODS
Intervention activities occurred in one middle school (enrollment: 847) located in a Federal Opportunity Zone in the Seattle, WA area, with control data from a nearby middle school (enrollment: 640). Students at the intervention school were eligible to receive a play kit during the quarter they were enrolled in physical education (PE) class. Student surveys were completed across the school year (n = 1076), with a primary outcome of days/week that the student engaged in ≥ 60 min of PA. Qualitative interviews (n = 25) were conducted with students, staff, parents, and community partners, and focused on play kit acceptability and feasibility.
RESULTS
During remote learning play kits were received by 58% of eligible students. Among students at the intervention school only, students actively enrolled in PE (versus not enrolled) reported significantly more days with ≥ 60 min of PA in the previous week, however the comparison between schools was not statistically significant. In qualitative interviews, most students reported the play kit motivated them to participate in PA, gave them activity ideas, and made virtual PE more enjoyable. Student-reported barriers to using play kits included space (indoors and outdoors), requirements to be quiet at home, necessary but unavailable adult supervision, lack of companions to play outdoors, and inclement weather.
CONCLUSIONS
A pre-existing community organization-school partnership lent itself to a rapid response to meet student needs at a time when school staff and resources were highly constrained. The intervention developed through this collaborative response-play kits-has potential to support middle school PA during future pandemics or other conditions that necessitate remote schooling, however modifications to the intervention concept and implementation strategy may be needed to improve reach and effectiveness.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36997887
doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15338-y
pii: 10.1186/s12889-023-15338-y
pmc: PMC10061390
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
604Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 May 14;5(1):e126
pubmed: 34367671
Am J Prev Med. 2001 Aug;21(2):110-7
pubmed: 11457630
J Phys Act Health. 2015 Oct;12(10):1436-46
pubmed: 25599111
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010 May 11;7:40
pubmed: 20459784
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Nov 3;173(9):767-770
pubmed: 32598162
Prev Med Rep. 2014 Oct 16;1:48-52
pubmed: 26844039
BMJ. 2000 Jan 8;320(7227):114-6
pubmed: 10625273
Can J Public Health. 2010 Sep-Oct;101(5):369-73
pubmed: 21214050
Child Indic Res. 2016;9:771-784
pubmed: 27489572
Prev Med. 2015 Jul;76:58-67
pubmed: 25900802
Qual Health Res. 2019 Aug;29(10):1483-1496
pubmed: 30628545
Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51
pubmed: 24979285
Health Psychol. 2015 Oct;34(10):971-82
pubmed: 25642841
J Sport Health Sci. 2016 Dec;5(4):500-508
pubmed: 30356577
Br J Sports Med. 2015 Jun;49(11):730-6
pubmed: 24273308
Am J Health Promot. 2017 May;31(3):189-191
pubmed: 26559708
Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1322-7
pubmed: 10474547
BMC Public Health. 2020 Sep 4;20(1):1351
pubmed: 32887592