Tick-borne pathogens and body condition of cattle in smallholder rural livestock production systems in East and West Africa.
Anaplasma centrale
Anaplasma marginale
Babesia bigemina
Babesia bovis
Ehrlichia ruminantium
Sub-Sahara Africa
Theileria parva
Vector competence
Journal
Parasites & vectors
ISSN: 1756-3305
Titre abrégé: Parasit Vectors
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101462774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Mar 2023
30 Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
28
11
2022
accepted:
18
02
2023
medline:
3
4
2023
entrez:
30
3
2023
pubmed:
31
3
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The majority of the African population lives in rural areas where they heavily depend on crop and livestock production for their livelihoods. Given their socio-economic importance, we initiated a standardized multi-country (Benin, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Nigeria, Ethiopia Tanzania and Uganda) surveillance study to assess the current status of important tick-borne haemoparasites (TBHPs) of cattle. We assessed pathogen prevalences (Anaplasma marginale, Anaplasma centrale, Babesia bigemina, Babesia bovis, Ehrlichia ruminantium, and Theileria parva) in the blood of 6447 animals spread over fourteen districts (two districts per country). In addition, we screened for intrinsic (sex, weight, body condition) and extrinsic (husbandry, tick exposure) risk factors as predictors of infections with TBHPs. There was a large macro-geographic variation observed in A. marginale, B. bigemina, B. bovis and E. ruminantium prevalences. Most correlated with the co-occurrence of their specific sets of vector-competent ticks. Highest numbers of infected cattle were found in Ghana and Benin, and lowest in Burkina Faso. While T. parva was seldomly found (Uganda only: 3.0%), A. marginale was found in each country with a prevalence of at least 40%. Babesia bovis infected individuals had lower body condition scores. Age (as estimated via body weight) was higher in A. marginale infected cattle, but was negatively correlated with B. bigemina and E. ruminantium prevalences. Ehrlichia ruminantium infection was more often found in males, and A. marginale more often in transhumance farming. High levels of co-infection, especially the combination A. marginale × B. bigemina, were observed in all countries, except for Uganda and Burkina Faso. Babesia bigemina was more or less often observed than expected by chance, when cattle were also co-infected with E. ruminantium or A. marginale, respectively. Tick-borne pathogens of cattle are ubiquitous in African's smallholder cattle production systems. Our standardized study will help a wide range of stakeholders to provide recommendations for TBHP surveillance and prevention in cattle, especially for B. bovis which heavily impacts production and continues its spread over the African continent via the invasive Rhipicephalus microplus tick.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The majority of the African population lives in rural areas where they heavily depend on crop and livestock production for their livelihoods. Given their socio-economic importance, we initiated a standardized multi-country (Benin, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Nigeria, Ethiopia Tanzania and Uganda) surveillance study to assess the current status of important tick-borne haemoparasites (TBHPs) of cattle.
METHODS
METHODS
We assessed pathogen prevalences (Anaplasma marginale, Anaplasma centrale, Babesia bigemina, Babesia bovis, Ehrlichia ruminantium, and Theileria parva) in the blood of 6447 animals spread over fourteen districts (two districts per country). In addition, we screened for intrinsic (sex, weight, body condition) and extrinsic (husbandry, tick exposure) risk factors as predictors of infections with TBHPs.
RESULTS
RESULTS
There was a large macro-geographic variation observed in A. marginale, B. bigemina, B. bovis and E. ruminantium prevalences. Most correlated with the co-occurrence of their specific sets of vector-competent ticks. Highest numbers of infected cattle were found in Ghana and Benin, and lowest in Burkina Faso. While T. parva was seldomly found (Uganda only: 3.0%), A. marginale was found in each country with a prevalence of at least 40%. Babesia bovis infected individuals had lower body condition scores. Age (as estimated via body weight) was higher in A. marginale infected cattle, but was negatively correlated with B. bigemina and E. ruminantium prevalences. Ehrlichia ruminantium infection was more often found in males, and A. marginale more often in transhumance farming. High levels of co-infection, especially the combination A. marginale × B. bigemina, were observed in all countries, except for Uganda and Burkina Faso. Babesia bigemina was more or less often observed than expected by chance, when cattle were also co-infected with E. ruminantium or A. marginale, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Tick-borne pathogens of cattle are ubiquitous in African's smallholder cattle production systems. Our standardized study will help a wide range of stakeholders to provide recommendations for TBHP surveillance and prevention in cattle, especially for B. bovis which heavily impacts production and continues its spread over the African continent via the invasive Rhipicephalus microplus tick.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36998091
doi: 10.1186/s13071-023-05709-0
pii: 10.1186/s13071-023-05709-0
pmc: PMC10064580
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
117Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Parasitology. 2011 Jul;138(8):1011-21
pubmed: 21733259
J Anim Ecol. 2016 Jul;85(4):1025-34
pubmed: 27084785
Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 1981 Dec;48(4):215-23
pubmed: 7345388
Vet Microbiol. 2008 Oct 15;131(3-4):258-65
pubmed: 18511221
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jan 15;105(2):566-70
pubmed: 18182496
Parasit Vectors. 2012 Sep 07;5:194
pubmed: 22958352
Ecol Lett. 2006 Apr;9(4):467-84
pubmed: 16623732
Vet Parasitol. 2010 Feb 10;167(2-4):123-35
pubmed: 19836892
Genet Sel Evol. 2022 Sep 4;54(1):58
pubmed: 36057548
Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2020 Apr 15;12:53-63
pubmed: 32426219
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2008 Sep;20(5):606-11
pubmed: 18776093
Heliyon. 2022 Jan 07;8(1):e08718
pubmed: 35059516
Exp Appl Acarol. 2011 Feb;53(2):139-45
pubmed: 20711801
Parasit Vectors. 2020 Apr 3;13(1):165
pubmed: 32245511
Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2016 Jun;7(4):549-64
pubmed: 26972687
Vet Parasitol. 2011 Feb 10;175(3-4):356-9
pubmed: 21075533
Methods Ecol Evol. 2020 Mar;11(3):442-447
pubmed: 32194928
Vet Parasitol. 2010 Feb 10;167(2-4):95-107
pubmed: 19811876
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2007 Nov;77(5):837-41
pubmed: 17984338
Parasitology. 2016 Jun;143(7):915-930
pubmed: 26302775
Parasitology. 2004;129 Suppl:S247-69
pubmed: 15938514