Hepatocellular carcinomas, exhibiting intratumor fibrosis, express cancer-specific extracellular matrix remodeling and WNT/TGFB signatures, associated with poor outcome.


Journal

Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)
ISSN: 1527-3350
Titre abrégé: Hepatology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8302946

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 09 2023
Historique:
received: 26 07 2022
accepted: 14 02 2023
medline: 21 8 2023
pubmed: 1 4 2023
entrez: 31 3 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

HCC, the third leading cause of cancer-related death, arises in the context of liver fibrosis. Although HCC is generally poorly fibrogenic, some tumors harbor focal intratumor extracellular matrix (ECM) deposits called "fibrous nests." To date, the molecular composition and clinical relevance of these ECM deposits have not been fully defined. We performed quantitative matrisome analysis by tandem mass tags mass spectrometry in 20 human cancer specific matrisome (HCCs) with high or low-grade intratumor fibrosis and matched nontumor tissues, as well as in 12 livers from mice treated with vehicle, carbon tetrachloride, or diethylnitrosamine. We found 94 ECM proteins differentially abundant between high and low-grade fibrous nests, including interstitial and basement membrane components, such as several collagens, glycoproteins, proteoglycans, enzymes involved in ECM stabilization and degradation, and growth factors. Pathway analysis revealed a metabolic switch in high-grade fibrosis, with enhanced glycolysis and decreased oxidative phosphorylation. Integrating the quantitative proteomics with transcriptomics from HCCs and nontumor livers (n = 2,285 samples), we identified a subgroup of fibrous nest HCCs, characterized by cancer-specific ECM remodeling, expression of the WNT/TGFB (S1) subclass signature, and poor patient outcome. Fibrous nest HCCs abundantly expressed an 11-fibrous-nest - protein signature, associated with poor patient outcome, by multivariate Cox analysis, and validated by multiplex immunohistochemistry. Matrisome analysis highlighted cancer-specific ECM deposits, typical of the WNT/TGFB HCC subclass, associated with poor patient outcomes. Hence, histologic reporting of intratumor fibrosis in HCC is of clinical relevance.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND AIMS
HCC, the third leading cause of cancer-related death, arises in the context of liver fibrosis. Although HCC is generally poorly fibrogenic, some tumors harbor focal intratumor extracellular matrix (ECM) deposits called "fibrous nests." To date, the molecular composition and clinical relevance of these ECM deposits have not been fully defined.
APPROACH AND RESULTS
We performed quantitative matrisome analysis by tandem mass tags mass spectrometry in 20 human cancer specific matrisome (HCCs) with high or low-grade intratumor fibrosis and matched nontumor tissues, as well as in 12 livers from mice treated with vehicle, carbon tetrachloride, or diethylnitrosamine. We found 94 ECM proteins differentially abundant between high and low-grade fibrous nests, including interstitial and basement membrane components, such as several collagens, glycoproteins, proteoglycans, enzymes involved in ECM stabilization and degradation, and growth factors. Pathway analysis revealed a metabolic switch in high-grade fibrosis, with enhanced glycolysis and decreased oxidative phosphorylation. Integrating the quantitative proteomics with transcriptomics from HCCs and nontumor livers (n = 2,285 samples), we identified a subgroup of fibrous nest HCCs, characterized by cancer-specific ECM remodeling, expression of the WNT/TGFB (S1) subclass signature, and poor patient outcome. Fibrous nest HCCs abundantly expressed an 11-fibrous-nest - protein signature, associated with poor patient outcome, by multivariate Cox analysis, and validated by multiplex immunohistochemistry.
CONCLUSIONS
Matrisome analysis highlighted cancer-specific ECM deposits, typical of the WNT/TGFB HCC subclass, associated with poor patient outcomes. Hence, histologic reporting of intratumor fibrosis in HCC is of clinical relevance.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36999534
doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000362
pii: 01515467-990000000-00362
doi:

Substances chimiques

Extracellular Matrix Proteins 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

741-757

Subventions

Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : S10 OD027016
Pays : United States

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Références

Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49.
Fattovich G, Stroffolini T, Zagni I, Donato F. Hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: incidence and risk factors. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:S35–50.
Brown ZJ, Heinrich B, Greten TF. Mouse models of hepatocellular carcinoma: an overview and highlights for immunotherapy research. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;15:536–54.
Arriazu E, Ruiz de Galarreta M, Cubero FJ, Varela-Rey M, Perez de Obanos MP, Leung TM, et al. Extracellular matrix and liver disease. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2014;21:1078–97.
Naba A, Clauser KR, Whittaker CA, Carr SA, Tanabe KK, Hynes RO. Extracellular matrix signatures of human primary metastatic colon cancers and their metastases to liver. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:518.
Baiocchini A, Montaldo C, Conigliaro A, Grimaldi A, Correani V, Mura F, et al. Extracellular Matrix Molecular Remodeling in Human Liver Fibrosis Evolution. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0151736.
Daneshgar A, Klein O, Nebrich G, Weinhart M, Tang P, Arnold A, et al. The human liver matrisome—proteomic analysis of native and fibrotic human liver extracellular matrices for organ engineering approaches. Biomaterials. 2020;257:120247.
Naba A, Clauser KR, Hoersch S, Liu H, Carr SA, Hynes RO. The matrisome: in silico definition and in vivo characterization by proteomics of normal and tumor extracellular matrices. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012;11:M111 014647.
Arteel GE, Naba A. The liver matrisome - looking beyond collagens. JHEP Rep. 2020;2:100115.
Desert R, Nieto N, Musso O. Dimensions of hepatocellular carcinoma phenotypic diversity. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24:4536–47.
Desert R, Mebarki S, Desille M, Sicard M, Lavergne E, Renaud S, et al. “Fibrous nests” in human hepatocellular carcinoma express a Wnt-induced gene signature associated with poor clinical outcome. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2016;81:195–207.
Naba A, Clauser KR, Ding H, Whittaker CA, Carr SA, Hynes RO. The extracellular matrix: tools and insights for the “omics” era. Matrix Biol. 2016;49:10–24.
Naba A, Clauser KR, Hynes RO. Enrichment of extracellular matrix proteins from tissues and digestion into peptides for mass spectrometry analysis. J Vis Exp. 2015:e53057.
Carpino G, Overi D, Melandro F, Grimaldi A, Cardinale V, Di Matteo S, et al. Matrisome analysis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma unveils a peculiar cancer-associated extracellular matrix structure. Clin Proteomics. 2019;16:37.
Krasny L, Paul A, Wai P, Howard BA, Natrajan RC, Huang PH. Comparative proteomic assessment of matrisome enrichment methodologies. Biochem J. 2016;473:3979–95.
Huang da W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:44–57.
Roy S, Hooiveld GJ, Seehawer M, Caruso S, Heinzmann F, Schneider AT, et al. microRNA 193a-5p regulates levels of nucleolar- and spindle-associated protein 1 to suppress hepatocarcinogenesis. Gastroenterology. 2018;155:1951–66 e1926.
Theret N, Musso O, Turlin B, Lotrian D, Bioulac-Sage P, Campion JP, et al. Increased extracellular matrix remodeling is associated with tumor progression in human hepatocellular carcinomas. Hepatology. 2001;34:82–8.
Szklarczyk D, Gable AL, Nastou KC, Lyon D, Kirsch R, Pyysalo S, et al. The STRING database in 2021: customizable protein-protein networks, and functional characterization of user-uploaded gene/measurement sets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:D605–12.
Musso O, Theret N, Heljasvaara R, Rehn M, Turlin B, Campion JP, et al. Tumor hepatocytes and basement membrane-Producing cells specifically express two different forms of the endostatin precursor, collagen XVIII, in human liver cancers. Hepatology. 2001;33:868–76.
Pascale RM, Calvisi DF, Simile MM, Feo CF, Feo F. The Warburg effect 97 years after its discovery. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12:2819.
DeWaal D, Nogueira V, Terry AR, Patra KC, Jeon SM, Guzman G, et al. Hexokinase-2 depletion inhibits glycolysis and induces oxidative phosphorylation in hepatocellular carcinoma and sensitizes to metformin. Nat Commun. 2018;9:446.
Filliol A, Saito Y, Nair A, Dapito DH, Yu LX, Ravichandra A, et al. Opposing roles of hepatic stellate cell subpopulations in hepatocarcinogenesis. Nature. 2022;610:356–65.
Shao X, Taha IN, Clauser KR, Gao YT, Naba A. MatrisomeDB: the ECM-protein knowledge database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:D1136–44.
Desert R, Rohart F, Canal F, Sicard M, Desille M, Renaud S, et al. Human hepatocellular carcinomas with a periportal phenotype have the lowest potential for early recurrence after curative resection. Hepatology. 2017;66:1502–18.
Hoshida Y, Villanueva A, Kobayashi M, Peix J, Chiang DY, Camargo A, et al. Gene expression in fixed tissues and outcome in hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1995–2004.
Liao YL, Sun YM, Chau GY, Chau YP, Lai TC, Wang JL, et al. Identification of SOX4 target genes using phylogenetic footprinting-based prediction from expression microarrays suggests that overexpression of SOX4 potentiates metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene. 2008;27:5578–89.
Lee JS, Chu IS, Heo J, Calvisi DF, Sun Z, Roskams T, et al. Classification and prediction of survival in hepatocellular carcinoma by gene expression profiling. Hepatology. 2004;40:667–76.
Cairo S, Armengol C, De Reynies A, Wei Y, Thomas E, Renard CA, et al. Hepatic stem-like phenotype and interplay of Wnt/beta-catenin and Myc signaling in aggressive childhood liver cancer. Cancer Cell. 2008;14:471–84.
Hoshida Y. Nearest template prediction: a single-sample-based flexible class prediction with confidence assessment. PLoS One. 2010;5:e15543.
Hoshida Y, Nijman SM, Kobayashi M, Chan JA, Brunet JP, Chiang DY, et al. Integrative transcriptome analysis reveals common molecular subclasses of human hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2009;69:7385–92.
Hung MH, Lee JS, Ma C, Diggs LP, Heinrich S, Chang CW, et al. Tumor methionine metabolism drives T-cell exhaustion in hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Commun. 2021;12:1455.
Andersen JB, Loi R, Perra A, Factor VM, Ledda-Columbano GM, Columbano A, et al. Progenitor-derived hepatocellular carcinoma model in the rat. Hepatology. 2010;51:1401–9.
Yamashita T, Forgues M, Wang W, Kim JW, Ye Q, Jia H, et al. EpCAM and alpha-fetoprotein expression defines novel prognostic subtypes of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2008;68:1451–61.
Minguez B, Hoshida Y, Villanueva A, Toffanin S, Cabellos L, Thung S, et al. Gene-expression signature of vascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2011;55:1325–31.
Boyault S, Rickman DS, de Reynies A, Balabaud C, Rebouissou S, Jeannot E, et al. Transcriptome classification of HCC is related to gene alterations and to new therapeutic targets. Hepatology. 2007;45:42–52.
Roessler S, Jia HL, Budhu A, Forgues M, Ye QH, Lee JS, et al. A unique metastasis gene signature enables prediction of tumor relapse in early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Cancer Res. 2010;70:10202–12.
Yuan Q, Zhang J, Liu Y, Chen H, Liu H, Wang J, et al. MyD88 in myofibroblasts regulates aerobic glycolysis-driven hepatocarcinogenesis via ERK-dependent PKM2 nuclear relocalization and activation. J Pathol. 2022;256:414–26.
Chen QT, Zhang ZY, Huang QL, Chen HZ, Hong WB, Lin T, et al. HK1 from hepatic stellate cell-derived extracellular vesicles promotes progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Metab. 2022;4:1306–21.
Dubois-Pot-Schneider H, Fekir K, Coulouarn C, Glaise D, Aninat C, Jarnouen K, et al. Inflammatory cytokines promote the retrodifferentiation of tumor-derived hepatocyte-like cells to progenitor cells. Hepatology. 2014;60:2077–90.
Fekir K, Dubois-Pot-Schneider H, Desert R, Daniel Y, Glaise D, Rauch C, et al. Retrodifferentiation of human tumor hepatocytes to stem cells leads to metabolic reprogramming and chemoresistance. Cancer Res. 2019;79:1869–83.
Mebarki S, Desert R, Sulpice L, Sicard M, Desille M, Canal F, et al. De novo HAPLN1 expression hallmarks Wnt-induced stem cell and fibrogenic networks leading to aggressive human hepatocellular carcinomas. Oncotarget. 2016;7:39026–43.
Lin HY, Li CJ, Yang YL, Huang YH, Hsiau YT, Chu PY. Roles of lysyl oxidase family members in the tumor microenvironment and progression of liver cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:9751.
Lamande SR, Bateman JF. Collagen VI disorders: Insights on form and function in the extracellular matrix and beyond. Matrix Biol. 2018;71-72:348–67.
Adebayo Michael AO, Ko S, Tao J, Moghe A, Yang H, Xu M, et al. Inhibiting glutamine-dependent mTORC1 activation ameliorates liver cancers driven by beta-catenin mutations. Cell Metab. 2019;29:1135–50. e1136.
Klaas M, Kangur T, Viil J, Maemets-Allas K, Minajeva A, Vadi K, et al. The alterations in the extracellular matrix composition guide the repair of damaged liver tissue. Sci Rep. 2016;6:27398.

Auteurs

Romain Desert (R)

Department of Pathology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Wei Chen (W)

Department of Pathology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Xiaodong Ge (X)

Department of Pathology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Roselyne Viel (R)

Univ Rennes, CNRS, INSERM, UMS Biosit, Rennes, France.

Hui Han (H)

Department of Pathology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Dipti Athavale (D)

Department of Pathology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Sukanta Das (S)

Department of Pathology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Zhuolun Song (Z)

Department of Pathology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Daniel Lantvit (D)

Department of Pathology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Luis Cano (L)

INSERM, Univ Rennes, Nutrition, Métabolismes et Cancer (NuMeCan), 2 Rue Henri le Guilloux, Rennes, France.

Alexandra Naba (A)

Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
University of Illinois Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Orlando Musso (O)

INSERM, Univ Rennes, Nutrition, Métabolismes et Cancer (NuMeCan), 2 Rue Henri le Guilloux, Rennes, France.

Natalia Nieto (N)

Department of Pathology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
University of Illinois Cancer Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH