What is the rate of successful closed reduction of dislocated dual mobility cups following complex revision hip arthroplasty?
Aseptic loosening
Closed reduction
Dual mobility cups
Hip dislocation
Hip replacement
Hip revision
Open reduction
Periprosthetic joint infection
Re-revision THA
Total hip arthroplasty
Journal
Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
ISSN: 1434-3916
Titre abrégé: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9011043
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2023
Oct 2023
Historique:
received:
18
12
2022
accepted:
26
02
2023
medline:
11
9
2023
pubmed:
1
4
2023
entrez:
31
3
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to assess the difference in success rates of closed reduction in septic and aseptic revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed with a dual mobility (DM) implant. Our objective was to answer the following questions: (1) Is there a difference in success rates of closed reduction between septic and aseptic revision THA with a DM implant? (2) Is closed or open reduction more successful in preventing re-dislocation? Between January 2009 and October 2021, 924 revisions were performed with a DM implant. All patients presenting to our institution with a dislocation following septic or aseptic revision THA using a cemented DM cup were included in this study. We analyzed 106 cases of dislocation in 74 patients. For all patients, we collected reason for revision, and classified index surgery as septic or aseptic. Overall, 106 dislocations occurred (106/924, 11.5%). Thirty-nine cases (52.7%) had a dislocation after a septic exchange THA, while in 35 patients (47.3%), a dislocation occurred after an aseptic rTHA. In 29 patients (39.2%), successful closed reduction under general anesthesia was feasible, while the majority of cases required open reduction. In 31 of these patients (67.4%), open reduction was combined with a revision arthroplasty. In case of DM cup dislocation, there is a low success rate of closed reduction. To prevent re-dislocation, total revision leads to a significantly reduced risk compared to open or closed reduction alone. Careful X-ray analysis for a halo sign showing intra-prosthetic DM cup dislocation is mandatory to avoid futile reduction attempts. III.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37000267
doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04826-w
pii: 10.1007/s00402-023-04826-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
6439-6445Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Ethgen O, Bruyère O, Richy F et al (2004) Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:963–974. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200405000-00012
doi: 10.2106/00004623-200405000-00012
pubmed: 15118039
Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C (2007) The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet 370:1508–1519. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60457-7
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60457-7
pubmed: 17964352
Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E et al (2009) The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:128–133. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00155
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00155
pubmed: 19122087
Springer BD, Fehring TK, Griffin WL et al (2009) Why revision total hip arthroplasty fails. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:166–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0566-z
doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0566-z
pubmed: 18975043
Schwartz AM, Farley KX, Guild GN, Bradbury TL (2020) Projections and epidemiology of revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States to 2030. J Arthroplasty 35:S79–S85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.030
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.02.030
pubmed: 32151524
pmcid: 7239745
Gwam CU, Mistry JB, Mohamed NS et al (2017) Current epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States: national inpatient sample 2009 to 2013. J Arthroplasty 32:2088–2092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.046
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.046
pubmed: 28336249
Berend KR, Sporer SM, Sierra RJ et al (2010) Achieving stability and lower-limb length in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:2737–2752
pubmed: 21084587
Parvizi J, Picinic E, Sharkey PF (2008) Revision total hip arthroplasty for instability: surgical techniques and principles. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:1134–1142
pubmed: 18451408
Enocson A, Pettersson H, Ponzer S et al (2009) Quality of life after dislocation of hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study on 319 patients with femoral neck fractures with a one-year follow-up. Qual Life Res 18:1177–1184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9531-x
doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9531-x
pubmed: 19714486
Abdel MP, Cross MB, Yasen AT, Haddad FS (2015) The functional and financial impact of isolated and recurrent dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 97-B:1046–1049. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.97B8.34952
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B8.34952
pubmed: 26224819
Davis AM, Wood AM, Keenan ACM et al (2011) Does body mass index affect clinical outcome post-operatively and at five years after primary unilateral total hip replacement performed for osteoarthritis? A multivariate analysis of prospective data. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:1178–1182. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.93B9.26873
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B9.26873
pubmed: 21911527
Delaunay C, Hamadouche M, Girard J, Duhamel A (2013) What are the causes for failures of primary hip arthroplasties in france? Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:3863–3869. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-013-2935-5
doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2935-5
pubmed: 23529633
pmcid: 3825891
Miller LE, Gondusky JS, Kamath AF et al (2018) Influence of surgical approach on complication risk in primary total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop 89:289–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2018.1438694
doi: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1438694
pubmed: 29451051
pmcid: 6055783
Newington DP, Bannister GC, Fordyce M (1990) Primary total hip replacement in patients over 80 years of age. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72:450–452. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.72B3.2341446
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.72B3.2341446
pubmed: 2341446
Woolson ST, Rahimtoola ZO (1999) Risk factors for dislocation during the first 3 months after primary total hip replacement. J Arthroplasty 14:662–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-5403(99)90219-x
doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(99)90219-x
pubmed: 10512436
Pai F-Y, Ma H-H, Chou T-FA et al (2021) Risk factors and modes of failure in the modern dual mobility implant. A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22:541. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04404-4
doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04404-4
pubmed: 34126990
pmcid: 8204435
Romagnoli M, Grassi A, Costa GG et al (2019) The efficacy of dual-mobility cup in preventing dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Int Orthop 43:1071–1082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4062-0
doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4062-0
pubmed: 30032356
You D, Sepehri A, Kooner S et al (2020) Outcomes of total hip arthroplasty using dual mobility components in patients with a femoral neck fracture. Bone Joint J 102-B:811–821. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.102B7.BJJ-2019-1486.R1
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B7.BJJ-2019-1486.R1
pubmed: 32600134
Canton G, Moghnie A, Cleva M et al (2019) Dual mobility total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a retrospective evaluation at mid-term follow-up. Acta Biomed 90:98–103. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v90i1-S.8070
doi: 10.23750/abm.v90i1-S.8070
pubmed: 30715006
Hernigou P, Dubory A, Potage D et al (2017) Dual-mobility arthroplasty failure: a rationale review of causes and technical considerations for revision. Int Orthop 41:481–490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-016-3328-7
doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3328-7
pubmed: 27872981
De Martino I, D’Apolito R, Soranoglou VG et al (2017) Dislocation following total hip arthroplasty using dual mobility acetabular components: a systematic review. Bone Joint J 99-B:18–24. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0398.R1
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0398.R1
pubmed: 28042114
Unter Ecker N, Kocaoğlu H, Zahar A et al (2021) What is the dislocation and revision rate of dual-mobility cups used in complex revision THAs? Clin Orthop Relat Res 479:280–285. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001467
doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001467
pubmed: 32898046
Plummer DR, Haughom BD, Della Valle CJ (2014) Dual mobility in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 45:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2013.08.004
doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2013.08.004
pubmed: 24267202
Castiello E, Moghnie A, Tigani D, Affatato S (2022) Dual mobility cup in hip arthroplasty: an in-depth analysis of joint registries. Artif Organs 46:804–812. https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.14015
doi: 10.1111/aor.14015
pubmed: 34153137
Cuthbert R, Wong J, Mitchell P, Kumar Jaiswal P (2019) Dual mobility in primary total hip arthroplasty: current concepts. EFORT Open Rev 4:640–646. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.180089
doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180089
pubmed: 31754471
pmcid: 6851525
Daney BT, Aman ZS, Krob JJ et al (2019) Utilization of transtibial centralization suture best minimizes extrusion and restores tibiofemoral contact mechanics for anatomic medial meniscal root repairs in a cadaveric model. Am J Sports Med 47:1591–1600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546519844250
doi: 10.1177/0363546519844250
pubmed: 31091129
Huten D, Fournier Y, Gicquel T et al (2019) Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty with a dual-mobility cup. Matched case-control study (16 cases vs. 48 controls). Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 105:1303–1309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2019.01.020
doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.01.020
pubmed: 31153859
Yun A, Qutami M, Carles E (2021) Modular dual mobility constructs used for recurrent hip instability. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18251
doi: 10.7759/cureus.18251
pubmed: 34722041
pmcid: 8547603
Mohammed R, Hayward K, Mulay S et al (2015) Outcomes of dual-mobility acetabular cup for instability in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Traumatol 16:9–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-014-0324-9
doi: 10.1007/s10195-014-0324-9
pubmed: 25330736
Forsythe ME, Whitehouse SL, Dick J, Crawford RW (2007) Functional outcomes after nonrecurrent dislocation of primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22:227–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2006.06.003
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.06.003
pubmed: 17275638
Maxwell HA, Turner PG (1994) Dislocation of the Austin Moore hemiarthroplasty: is closed manipulation justified? J R Coll Surg Edinb 39:370–371
pubmed: 7869293
Odumala AO, Iqbal MR, Middleton RG (2010) Failure of closed reduction after dislocation of Austin Moore hemiarthroplasty: an analysis of risk factors a 6-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 25:781–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.035
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.035
pubmed: 19604664
Terjesen T (2018) Long-term outcome of closed reduction in late-detected hip dislocation: 60 patients aged six to 36 months at diagnosis followed to a mean age of 58 years. J Child Orthop 12:369–374. https://doi.org/10.1302/1863-2548.12.180024
doi: 10.1302/1863-2548.12.180024
pubmed: 30154928
pmcid: 6090184
Hamadouche M, Biau DJ, Huten D et al (2010) The use of a cemented dual mobility socket to treat recurrent dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:3248–3254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1404-7
doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1404-7
pubmed: 20532718
pmcid: 2974879
Saragaglia D, Ruatti S, Refaie R (2013) Relevance of a press-fit dual mobility cup to deal with recurrent dislocation of conventional total hip arthroplasty: a 29-case series. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 23:431–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-012-1002-3
doi: 10.1007/s00590-012-1002-3
pubmed: 23412147
Simian E, Chatellard R, Druon J et al (2015) Dual mobility cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: dislocation rate and survival after 5 years. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 101:577–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2015.05.002
doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.05.002
pubmed: 26138633
Tigani D, Banci L, Valtorta R, Amendola L (2022) Hip stability parameters with dual mobility, modular dual mobility and fixed bearing in total hip arthroplasty: an analytical evaluation. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 23:373. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05280-2
doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05280-2
pubmed: 35443656
pmcid: 9022332
Lawrie CM, Barrack RL, Nunley RM (2021) Modular dual mobility total hip arthroplasty is a viable option for young, active patients: a mid-term follow-up study. Bone Joint J 103-B:73–77. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.103B7.BJJ-2021-0145.R1
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B7.BJJ-2021-0145.R1
pubmed: 34192909
Gaines RJ, Hardenbrook M (2009) Closed reduction of a dislocated total hip arthroplasty with a constrained acetabular component. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 38:523–525
pubmed: 20011742
Gioe TJ (2002) Dislocation following revision total hip arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 31:225–227
pubmed: 12008856
Loubignac F, Boissier F (1997) Cup dissociation after reduction of a dislocated hip hemiarthroplasty. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 83:469–472
pubmed: 9452801
Mehta N, Selvaratnam V, Alsousou J et al (2021) Outcome of revision surgery in recurrent dislocation of primary total hip arthroplasty. Hip Int 31:644–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/1120700020911146
doi: 10.1177/1120700020911146
pubmed: 32157907