Sampling of Atlantic salmon using the Norwegian Quality cut (NQC) vs. Whole fillet; differences in contaminant and nutrient contents.
Atlantic salmon
Contaminants
Norwegian quality cut
Nutrients
Sampling
Journal
Food chemistry
ISSN: 1873-7072
Titre abrégé: Food Chem
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7702639
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Aug 2023
30 Aug 2023
Historique:
received:
13
04
2022
revised:
24
02
2023
accepted:
26
03
2023
medline:
19
4
2023
pubmed:
2
4
2023
entrez:
1
4
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Risk- benefit assessments of seafood require high-quality food composition data. In accordance with EU regulations, Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) has conventionally been sampled using the Norwegian Quality Cut (NQC), a sub-cut of the middle section of the fish, in Norwegian surveillance programs. By comparing the contents of nutrients and contaminants in 34 samples of farmed Atlantic salmon, we aimed to evaluate the representativeness of the NQC compared with the whole fillet. Of the 129 analytes evaluated, eight single analytes, in addition to 25 different fatty acids, showed significant differences between the cuts. Significant differences were evident for total fat, including eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), and sum PCB-6, but not for the sum of dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs. We further suggest that the NQC may still be used in large-scale sampling of Atlantic salmon, and that the whole fillet would be preferable when analysing the content of nutrients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37003200
pii: S0308-8146(23)00674-X
doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136056
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
DFC2HB4I0K
Dioxins
0
Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
136056Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.