The regional evolution of job insecurity during the first COVID-19 wave in relation to the pandemic intensity.
COVID-19 pandemic
European Union
Job insecurity
Spatial model
Journal
Letters in spatial and resource sciences
ISSN: 1864-404X
Titre abrégé: Lett Spat Resour Sci
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101773684
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
21
09
2022
accepted:
10
03
2023
medline:
4
4
2023
entrez:
3
4
2023
pubmed:
4
4
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
As the COVID-19 pandemic hit the European continent at the beginning of 2020, one of the most significant socio-economic effects that immediately become the central focus of media and governing bodies was the unemployment and the sudden transformations suffered by the job market. This effect created major concerns for citizens and governing structures, as the pandemic generated a new and unparalleled economic context, where the short and medium-term future of several sectors seemed unpredictable. The concern acted upon the job insecurity of individuals, a perceived threat to the continuity and stability of their employment. Based on a self-reported survey covering the first pandemic wave, our study classifies the regions (NUTS2 level) from six EU countries according to their performance in terms of job insecurity, but also the shock intensity (death rates and case fatality ratio), and identifies the overall over and under performers. The results show that the regional evolution of the job insecurity could be linked to the pandemic evolution, especially in the stronger economies. However, the model does not follow a classic economic core-periphery pattern. The model is challenged especially by a stronger performance of several less performant regions from Italy, Romania, or France. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12076-023-00337-9.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37006656
doi: 10.1007/s12076-023-00337-9
pii: 337
pmc: PMC10042419
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
13Informations de copyright
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Compliance with ethical standardsThe authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Références
J Occup Health Psychol. 2002 Jul;7(3):242-64
pubmed: 12148956
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Mar;70(6):867-74
pubmed: 20060634
J Occup Health Psychol. 2014 Jul;19(3):269-90
pubmed: 24796228
Occup Environ Med. 2020 Nov 18;:
pubmed: 33208409
Int J Health Serv. 2016 Oct;46(4):656-92
pubmed: 27604540
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 16;10:694
pubmed: 31040802
Clin Psychol Sci. 2019 Sep;7(5):900-913
pubmed: 32775044
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2017 Oct;90(7):663-671
pubmed: 28509941
J Adolesc Health. 2021 Jan;68(1):53-56
pubmed: 33183926
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 18;10:286
pubmed: 30833919
J Occup Environ Med. 2020 Sep;62(9):686-691
pubmed: 32890205
Health Psychol. 2009 Jan;28(1):91-100
pubmed: 19210022
Int J Surg. 2020 Jun;78:185-193
pubmed: 32305533
Eur J Health Econ. 2018 Jan;19(1):59-73
pubmed: 28091762
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 12;10:799
pubmed: 31031675
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2016 Mar;3(1):81-91
pubmed: 27239427
Ind Health. 2008 Dec;46(6):613-9
pubmed: 19088414
Front Psychol. 2021 Jul 15;12:632265
pubmed: 34335356
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 13;12:648572
pubmed: 34484024
GeoJournal. 2022 Mar 11;:1-8
pubmed: 35309019
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Mar;101(3):450-62
pubmed: 26348477
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 11;12:647972
pubmed: 34177703