What does non-standard employment look like in the United States? An empirical typology of employment quality.
Employment quality
labor market segmentation
latent class analysis
nonstandard employment
precarious employment
Journal
Social indicators research
ISSN: 0303-8300
Titre abrégé: Soc Indic Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7501244
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2022
Sep 2022
Historique:
medline:
4
4
2023
entrez:
3
4
2023
pubmed:
4
4
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Despite significant interest in the changing nature of employment as a critical social and economic challenge facing society-especially the decline in the so-called Standard Employment Relationship (SER) and rise in more insecure, precarious forms of employment-scholars have struggled to operationalize the multifaceted and heterogeneous nature of contemporary worker-employer relationships within empirical analyses. Here we investigate the character and distribution of employment relationships in the U.S., drawing on a representative sample of wage-earners and self-employed from the General Social Survey (2002 - 2018). We use the multidimensional construct of employment quality (EQ), which includes both contractual (e.g., wages, contract type) and relational (e.g., employee representation and participation) aspects of employment. We further employ a typological measurement approach, using latent class analysis, to explicitly examine how the multiple aspects of employment cluster together in modern labor markets. We present eight distinct employment types in the U.S., including one resembling the historical conception of the SER model (24% of the total workforce), and others representing various constellations of favorable and adverse employment features. These employment types are unevenly distributed across society, in terms of who works these jobs and where they are found in the labor market. Importantly, women, those with lower education, and younger workers are more likely to be in precarious forms of employment. More generally, our typology reveals limitations associated with binary conceptions of standard vs. non-standard employment, or insider-outsider dichotomies envisioned within dual labor market theories.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37006816
doi: 10.1007/s11205-022-02907-8
pmc: PMC10062421
mid: NIHMS1881172
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
555-583Subventions
Organisme : Intramural CDC HHS
ID : CC999999
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMHD NIH HHS
ID : F31 MD013357
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG060011
Pays : United States
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declarations Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Références
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Nov;264:113327
pubmed: 32919256
Work. 2014;49(1):143-61
pubmed: 23803435
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Jun;158:132-40
pubmed: 27135543
Ann Work Expo Health. 2019 Jul 24;63(6):619-623
pubmed: 31225592
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2021 Mar 1;47(2):117-126
pubmed: 32997147
RSF. 2019 Sep;5(4):258-281
pubmed: 31548990
Am Sociol Rev. 2019 Feb 1;84(1):82-114
pubmed: 33311716
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2020 May 1;46(3):321-329
pubmed: 31735974
SSM Popul Health. 2021 Jul 09;15:100868
pubmed: 34553014
Gac Sanit. 2015 Sep-Oct;29(5):379-82
pubmed: 26253337
Econ Soc Rev (Irel). 2018 Fall;49(3):241-258
pubmed: 31435077
Annu Rev Public Health. 2014;35:229-53
pubmed: 24641559
Front Sociol. 2020 May 22;5:34
pubmed: 33869441
Arch Public Health. 2017 Aug 24;75:55
pubmed: 28852501
Int J Health Serv. 2017 Jul;47(3):389-409
pubmed: 28449605
Dev Psychopathol. 1997 Spring;9(2):291-319
pubmed: 9201446
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2021 Apr 1;47(3):171-180
pubmed: 33283874