Diagnostic accuracy of the NOVA Tuberculosis Total Antibody Rapid test for detection of pulmonary tuberculosis and infection with
Diagnostic accuracy
Lateral flow
Mycobacteria
Sensitivity
Specificity
Tuberculosis
Journal
Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases
ISSN: 2405-5794
Titre abrégé: J Clin Tuberc Other Mycobact Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101682877
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2023
May 2023
Historique:
medline:
4
4
2023
entrez:
3
4
2023
pubmed:
4
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The NOVA Tuberculosis Total Antibody Rapid Test is a commercially available lateral flow serological assay that is intended to be used as an aid in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. We conducted a study to estimate diagnostic accuracy of this assay for diagnosis of active pulmonary tuberculosis disease and for detection of This study used existing frozen plasma specimens that had been obtained previously from consenting HIV-negative adults in Cambodia, South Africa, and Vietnam whose tuberculosis status was rigorously characterized using sputum mycobacterial cultures and blood interferon gamma release assay. The investigational assay was performed in a single laboratory by laboratory staff specifically trained to conduct the assays according to the manufacturer's procedures. In addition, intensity of the test band was subjectively assessed. Plasma specimens from 150 participants were tested. All testing attempts yielded a determinate result of either positive or negative. For diagnosis of active pulmonary tuberculosis disease, test sensitivity and specificity were 40.0 % (20/50, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 27.6 % to 53.8 %) and 85.0 % (95 % CI 76.7 % to 90.7 %), respectively. For detection of Study findings do not support a role for the NOVA Tuberculosis Test in current tuberculosis diagnostic algorithms.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
The NOVA Tuberculosis Total Antibody Rapid Test is a commercially available lateral flow serological assay that is intended to be used as an aid in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. We conducted a study to estimate diagnostic accuracy of this assay for diagnosis of active pulmonary tuberculosis disease and for detection of
Methods
UNASSIGNED
This study used existing frozen plasma specimens that had been obtained previously from consenting HIV-negative adults in Cambodia, South Africa, and Vietnam whose tuberculosis status was rigorously characterized using sputum mycobacterial cultures and blood interferon gamma release assay. The investigational assay was performed in a single laboratory by laboratory staff specifically trained to conduct the assays according to the manufacturer's procedures. In addition, intensity of the test band was subjectively assessed.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Plasma specimens from 150 participants were tested. All testing attempts yielded a determinate result of either positive or negative. For diagnosis of active pulmonary tuberculosis disease, test sensitivity and specificity were 40.0 % (20/50, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 27.6 % to 53.8 %) and 85.0 % (95 % CI 76.7 % to 90.7 %), respectively. For detection of
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
Study findings do not support a role for the NOVA Tuberculosis Test in current tuberculosis diagnostic algorithms.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37006993
doi: 10.1016/j.jctube.2023.100362
pii: S2405-5794(23)00018-9
pmc: PMC10064436
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100362Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : U01 AI152084
Pays : United States
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Atlas Link Technology donated the NOVA Tuberculosis Tests for this study but had no role in study design, study conduct, data analysis or decision to publish study results.
Références
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Mar 17;9(3):
pubmed: 33802846
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 16;9:760795
pubmed: 34976922
Vet J. 2009 Jun;180(3):325-9
pubmed: 18783968
Arch Bronconeumol. 2021 Apr;57:5-6
pubmed: 34629626
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2021 Jan;36(1):13-17
pubmed: 32857892
J Virol Methods. 1988 Jun;20(2):127-32
pubmed: 3166465