Long-term outcomes of third-line therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia: A real-life experience.
chronic myeloid leukemia
chronic phase
complete cytogenetic response
efficacy of therapy
third-line therapy
Journal
Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
23
01
2023
accepted:
01
03
2023
medline:
4
4
2023
entrez:
3
4
2023
pubmed:
4
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy has greatly improved the prognosis of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), improving the survival expectancy of patients with chronic phase (CP) CML to that of the general population. However, despite these advances, nearly 50% of patients with CP CML experience failure to respond to frontline therapy, and most fail to respond to the subsequent second-line TKI. Treatment guidelines for patients failing second-line therapy are lacking. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of TKIs as third-line therapy in a "real-world" clinical practice setting and identify factors favorably influencing the long-term outcomes of therapy. We have retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 100 patients with CP CML. The median age of the patients was 51 (range, 21-88) years, and 36% of the patients were men. The median duration of the third-line TKI therapy was 22 (range, 1- 147) months. Overall, the rate of achieving complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) was 35%. Among the four patient groups with different levels of responses at baseline, the best results were achieved in the groups with any CyR at the baseline of third-line therapy. Thus, СCyR was reached in all 15 and 8/ 16 (50%) patients with partial cytogenetic response (PCyR) or minimal or minor CyR (mmCyR), respectively, whereas CCyR was detected only in 12/69 (17%) patients without any CyR at baseline (p < 0.001). Univariate regression analysis revealed that the factors negatively associated with CCyR achievement in thirdline TKI therapy were the absence of any CyR on first- or second-line TKI therapy (p < 0.001), absence of CHR prior to third-line TKI (p = 0.003), and absence of any CyR prior to third-line TKI (p < 0.001). During the median observation time from treatment initiation to the last visit [56 (4-180) months], 27% of cases progressed into accelerated phase or blast phase CML, and 32% of patients died. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly higher in patients with CCyR on third-line than in the group without CCyR on third-line therapy. At the last visit, third-line TKI therapy was ongoing in 18% of patients, with a median time of treatment exposure of 58 (range, 6-140) months; 83% of these patients had stable and durable CCyR, suggesting that patients without CHR at baseline and without CCyR at least by 12 months on third-line TKI should be candidates for allogeneic stem cell transplantation, third-generation TKIs, or experimental therapies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37007128
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1138683
pmc: PMC10061114
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1138683Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Chitanava, Matvienko, Shuvaev, Voloshin, Martynkevich, Vlasova, Efremova, Mileeva, Pirkhalo, Makarova, Vlasik, Karyagina, Il`ina, Medvedeva, Dorofeeva, Shneider, Siordiya, Kulemina, Sbityakova, Lazorko, Alexeeva, Motorin, Morozova and Lomaia.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
EL received fees for lecturing and expert opinion from Novartis, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Fusion Pharma. VS received fees for lecturing and expert opinion from Novartis, Pfizer, Amgen, and AbbVie. SV received fees for lecturing and expert opinion from Pfizer, Novartis, Janssen, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Biocad, and Sotex. DM received fees for lecturing and expert opinion from Novartis, Pfizer, Janssen, and AstraZeneca. JA received fees for lecturing and expert opinion from AbbVie and Pfizer. IrM received fees for lecturing and expert opinion from Novartis, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Fusion Pharma, Janssen, AstraZeneca, and Sanofi. YV received fees for lecturing and expert opinion from Novartis and Pfizer. NM received fees for lecturing and expert opinion from Janssen, Sanofi, and Sotex. ElM received fees for lecturing and expert opinion from Novartis, Pfizer, and Amgen. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Haematologica. 2018 Aug;103(8):1298-1307
pubmed: 29773593
Blood. 2010 Dec 16;116(25):5497-500
pubmed: 20833982
Blood. 2009 Nov 12;114(20):4361-8
pubmed: 19729517
Haematologica. 2013 Mar;98(3):399-403
pubmed: 22801965
Semin Hematol. 2003 Apr;40(2 Suppl 2):56-61
pubmed: 12783377
Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2019 Jul - Sep;41(3):222-228
pubmed: 31085148
Am J Hematol. 2022 Sep;97(9):1236-1256
pubmed: 35751859
Leukemia. 2021 Feb;35(2):440-453
pubmed: 33414482
Blood. 2014 Apr 10;123(15):2317-24
pubmed: 24569263
J Hematol Oncol. 2021 Mar 18;14(1):44
pubmed: 33736651
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma. 2009 Jun;9(3):217-22
pubmed: 19525190
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2015 Jun;15(6):323-34
pubmed: 25971713
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2014 Nov;140(11):1965-9
pubmed: 24952896
Leukemia. 2020 Apr;34(4):966-984
pubmed: 32127639
Hematology. 2018 May;23(4):212-220
pubmed: 28990873
Leukemia. 2020 Jun;34(6):1495-1502
pubmed: 32366938
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2015 Aug;70(8):550-5
pubmed: 26247667
Blood. 2013 Aug 8;122(6):872-84
pubmed: 23803709
Ann Hematol. 2019 Feb;98(2):321-330
pubmed: 30446802
Am J Hematol. 2016 Dec;91(12):1206-1214
pubmed: 27531525
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug 20;34(24):2851-7
pubmed: 27325849
Leukemia. 2013 Jan;27(1):107-12
pubmed: 22763385
Leukemia. 2016 Jan;30(1):48-56
pubmed: 26416462