3D electron microscopy and volume-based bouton sorting reveal the selectivity of inputs onto geniculate relay cell and interneuron dendrite segments.
LGN
SBEM
corticogeniculate
retinogeniculate
unbiased sampling
visual thalamus
Journal
Frontiers in neuroanatomy
ISSN: 1662-5129
Titre abrégé: Front Neuroanat
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101477943
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
24
01
2023
accepted:
27
02
2023
medline:
4
4
2023
entrez:
3
4
2023
pubmed:
4
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The visual signals evoked at the retinal ganglion cells are modified and modulated by various synaptic inputs that impinge on lateral geniculate nucleus cells before they are sent to the cortex. The selectivity of geniculate inputs for clustering or forming microcircuits on discrete dendritic segments of geniculate cell types may provide the structural basis for network properties of the geniculate circuitry and differential signal processing through the parallel pathways of vision. In our study, we aimed to reveal the patterns of input selectivity on morphologically discernable relay cell types and interneurons in the mouse lateral geniculate nucleus. We used two sets of Scanning Blockface Electron Microscopy (SBEM) image stacks and Reconstruct software to manually reconstruct of terminal boutons and dendrite segments. First, using an unbiased terminal sampling (UTS) approach and statistical modeling, we identified the criteria for volume-based sorting of geniculate boutons into their putative origins. Geniculate terminal boutons that were sorted in retinal and non-retinal categories based on previously described mitochondrial morphology, could further be sorted into multiple subpopulations based on their bouton volume distributions. Terminals deemed non-retinal based on the morphological criteria consisted of five distinct subpopulations, including small-sized putative corticothalamic and cholinergic boutons, two medium-sized putative GABAergic inputs, and a large-sized bouton type that contains dark mitochondria. Retinal terminals also consisted of four distinct subpopulations. The cutoff criteria for these subpopulations were then applied to datasets of terminals that synapse on reconstructed dendrite segments of relay cells or interneurons. Using a network analysis approach, we found an almost complete segregation of retinal and cortical terminals on putative X-type cell dendrite segments characterized by grape-like appendages and triads. On these cells, interneuron appendages intermingle with retinal and other medium size terminals to form triads within glomeruli. In contrast, a second, presumed Y-type cell displayed dendrodendritic puncta adherentia and received all terminal types without a selectivity for synapse location; these were not engaged in triads. Furthermore, the contribution of retinal and cortical synapses received by X-, Y- and interneuron dendrites differed such that over 60% of inputs to interneuron dendrites were from the retina, as opposed to 20% and 7% to X- and Y-type cells, respectively. The results underlie differences in network properties of synaptic inputs from distinct origins on geniculate cell types.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37007643
doi: 10.3389/fnana.2023.1150747
pmc: PMC10064015
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1150747Subventions
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : UF1 NS122040
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Maher, Briegel, Imtiaz, Fox, Golino and Erisir.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Comp Neurol. 1998 Jan 12;390(2):247-55
pubmed: 9453668
Neuron. 2004 Apr 22;42(2):253-68
pubmed: 15091341
J Comp Neurol. 1970 Mar;138(3):339-66
pubmed: 5442835
J Hirnforsch. 1981;22(1):59-74
pubmed: 7240727
J Comp Neurol. 2000 Jan 24;416(4):509-20
pubmed: 10660881
J Comp Neurol. 1985 Dec 22;242(4):561-83
pubmed: 2418081
Cell Rep. 2017 Feb 21;18(8):2058-2072
pubmed: 28228269
J Neurophysiol. 2013 Jul;110(2):470-80
pubmed: 23615551
J Microsc. 1984 May;134(Pt 2):127-36
pubmed: 6737468
J Neurosci. 1989 Aug;9(8):2931-53
pubmed: 2769372
J Hirnforsch. 1979;20(6):561-80
pubmed: 121133
Mol Cell Neurosci. 2018 Oct;92:40-49
pubmed: 29969655
Vis Neurosci. 2017 Jan;34:E008
pubmed: 28965501
Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1984 Jun 22;221(1225):411-36
pubmed: 6146984
Exp Brain Res. 1966;2(4):283-301
pubmed: 5957903
J Comp Neurol. 1987 May 8;259(2):165-92
pubmed: 3584556
Nature. 1985 Oct 17-23;317(6038):618-21
pubmed: 4058571
J Anat. 1966 Jul;100(Pt 3):451-86
pubmed: 5965439
J Physiol. 1987 Nov;392:147-65
pubmed: 2833597
R J. 2016 Aug;8(1):289-317
pubmed: 27818791
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Jun 9;95(12):7121-6
pubmed: 9618549
J Neurophysiol. 1996 Sep;76(3):1367-95
pubmed: 8890259
Neurosci Lett. 2002 Apr 26;323(2):141-5
pubmed: 11950513
J Comp Neurol. 2003 Jun 2;460(3):368-79
pubmed: 12692855
J Microsc. 2005 Apr;218(Pt 1):52-61
pubmed: 15817063
J Comp Neurol. 1989 Oct 22;288(4):647-75
pubmed: 2478594
J Comp Neurol. 1986 Dec 8;254(2):228-45
pubmed: 3540041
J Microsc. 2002 Apr;206(Pt 1):54-64
pubmed: 12000563
Neuroscience. 2015 Sep 10;303:604-29
pubmed: 26188286
Exp Brain Res. 1991;86(2):257-70
pubmed: 1756802
Cell. 2016 Mar 24;165(1):192-206
pubmed: 27015312
Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1969 Mar 11;172(1027):153-71
pubmed: 4388107
J Comp Neurol. 1994 Dec 8;350(2):281-301
pubmed: 7884043
J Comp Neurol. 1984 Mar 10;223(4):515-34
pubmed: 6715570
Brain Behav Evol. 1985;26(1):10-48
pubmed: 3902145
Neurol Sci. 2011 Dec;32(6):1047-56
pubmed: 21544663
J Comp Neurol. 2008 May 10;508(2):264-85
pubmed: 18314907
Prog Brain Res. 2002;136:333-57
pubmed: 12143393
J Neurophysiol. 1981 Jul;46(1):80-129
pubmed: 7264710
J Histochem Cytochem. 2019 May;67(5):351-360
pubmed: 30624131
Neuron. 2020 May 6;106(3):468-481.e2
pubmed: 32142646
J Comp Neurol. 2010 Mar 1;518(5):622-35
pubmed: 20034053
Trends Neurosci. 2004 Nov;27(11):670-5
pubmed: 15474167
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49161
pubmed: 23139837
Front Synaptic Neurosci. 2010 Mar 15;2:2
pubmed: 21423488
J Neurosci. 1996 Oct 1;16(19):5923-41
pubmed: 8815875
J Anat. 1974 Jul;117(Pt 3):487-516
pubmed: 4370696
J Neurosci. 2012 Dec 5;32(49):17894-908
pubmed: 23223308
J Neurophysiol. 2020 Aug 1;124(2):404-417
pubmed: 32609582
J Comp Neurol. 2015 Aug 15;523(12):1792-808
pubmed: 25521420
Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1969;96(1):1-38
pubmed: 5772028
Front Psychol. 2011 Aug 22;2:193
pubmed: 22007176
Front Neuroanat. 2021 Dec 15;15:781314
pubmed: 34975419
Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 28;6:24904
pubmed: 27121468
J Neurophysiol. 2018 Jul 1;120(1):211-225
pubmed: 29641300
Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat. 1964 Apr 9;62:333-55
pubmed: 14218147
Cell Rep. 2015 Sep 8;12(10):1575-83
pubmed: 26321636
J Comp Neurol. 1989 May 22;283(4):541-58
pubmed: 2745753
PLoS Biol. 2004 Nov;2(11):e329
pubmed: 15514700
J Neurosci. 2013 Jan 9;33(2):507-22
pubmed: 23303931
J Comp Neurol. 1997 Jan 27;377(4):535-49
pubmed: 9007191
J Comp Neurol. 2001 Jan 29;430(1):85-100
pubmed: 11135247
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Feb 18;94(4):1517-20
pubmed: 9037085
J Comp Neurol. 2001 Nov 26;440(4):321-41
pubmed: 11745627
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2015 Jul 8;38:221-46
pubmed: 25897874
Nature. 2016 Jan 21;529(7586):345-50
pubmed: 26735013
Front Neural Circuits. 2016 Jan 12;9:86
pubmed: 26793068
Brain Res. 1983 Dec 12;288(1-2):344-8
pubmed: 6198031
J Microsc. 1987 Sep;147(Pt 3):229-63
pubmed: 3430576
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008 Dec;18(6):633-41
pubmed: 19361979
Neural Dev. 2014 Jul 10;9:16
pubmed: 25011644
J Neurosci. 2011 Nov 30;31(48):17437-48
pubmed: 22131405
Eur J Neurosci. 2019 Apr;49(7):938-947
pubmed: 29575193
J Neurosci. 2007 Sep 26;27(39):10434-44
pubmed: 17898215
J Comp Neurol. 1999 Oct 11;413(1):83-100
pubmed: 10464372
J Comp Neurol. 2000 Sep 4;424(4):701-17
pubmed: 10931491
J Comp Neurol. 1988 Feb 15;268(3):448-68
pubmed: 3360998