Impacts of commingling preconditioned and auction-derived beef calves on bovine respiratory disease related morbidity, mortality, and weight gain.

auction-derived average daily gain (ADG) fence-line weaning health performance mixing preconditioning

Journal

Frontiers in veterinary science
ISSN: 2297-1769
Titre abrégé: Front Vet Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101666658

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 04 01 2023
accepted: 27 02 2023
medline: 4 4 2023
entrez: 3 4 2023
pubmed: 4 4 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Stressors predisposing to bovine respiratory disease (BRD) upon arrival in the feedlot, include the ranch to feedlot transition and mixing cattle from multiple sources. Preconditioning (PC) reduces multiple stressors, but commingling PC and auction-derived (AD) calves in a feedlot may increase BRD risk. Our objective was to evaluate PC calf performance over the first 40 days in the feedlot and determine impacts of commingling with varying proportions of AD calves (25, 50, and 75%). Calves were either preconditioned at one ranch ( Over 40 days, morbidity in pen 100 PC was lower compared to 0 PC (24 vs. 50%, In conclusion, PC calves had lower morbidity over the first 40 days, irrespective of commingling. With larger variations in arrival weight, there was no advantage of PC for ADG in the first 40 days. The unknown weaning strategies and comparable arrival weights of AD calves may have contributed to greater ADG in AD calves.

Identifiants

pubmed: 37008349
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1137078
pmc: PMC10063904
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1137078

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Mijar, van der Meer, Pajor, Hodder, Louden, Thompson and Orsel.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

J Anim Sci. 2006 Aug;84(8):1999-2008
pubmed: 16864858
Anim Health Res Rev. 2009 Dec;10(2):131-9
pubmed: 20003649
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2010 Jul;26(2):381-94
pubmed: 20619191
Can Vet J. 2010 Dec;51(12):1351-9
pubmed: 21358927
Anim Health Res Rev. 2009 Dec;10(2):105-8
pubmed: 20003642
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 1997 Nov;13(3):367-77
pubmed: 9368983
J Anim Sci. 2007 Mar;85(3):823-40
pubmed: 17085724
J Anim Sci. 2008 Nov;86(11):3146-58
pubmed: 18567723
Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2010 Jul;26(2):273-84
pubmed: 20619184
Anim Health Res Rev. 2014 Dec;15(2):186-8
pubmed: 25417920
J Anim Sci. 2010 Feb;88(2):802-10
pubmed: 19854991
Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2021;75(7):102
pubmed: 34177046
Anim Health Res Rev. 2014 Dec;15(2):166-8
pubmed: 25351390

Auteurs

Sanjaya Mijar (S)

Department of Production Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Frank van der Meer (F)

Department of Ecosystem and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Ed Pajor (E)

Department of Production Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Abigail Hodder (A)

Department of Production Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Julia Morgan Louden (JM)

Department of Production Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Sean Thompson (S)

Technology Access Centre for Livestock Production, Olds College Centre for Innovation, Olds College, Olds, AB, Canada.

Karin Orsel (K)

Department of Production Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Classifications MeSH