Sex impacts pain behaviour but not emotional reactivity of lambs following ring tail docking.


Journal

PeerJ
ISSN: 2167-8359
Titre abrégé: PeerJ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101603425

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 14 11 2022
accepted: 27 02 2023
medline: 4 4 2023
entrez: 3 4 2023
pubmed: 4 4 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Studies in humans have shown sex differences in response to painful events, however, little is known in relation to sex differences in sheep. Understanding sex differences would enable improved experimental design and interpretation of studies of painful procedures in sheep. To examine sex differences in response to pain, 80 lambs were tested across five cohorts of 16. The lambs were penned in groups containing two male and two female lambs with their respective mothers. Lambs were randomly allocated from within each block to one of four treatment groups; FRing-Female lamb, ring tail docked without analgesia, MRing-Male lamb, ring tail docked without analgesia, FSham-Female lamb, tail manipulated and MSham-Male lamb, tail manipulated. Following treatment, lambs were returned to their pen and were video recorded for 45 mins for behavioural observations of acute pain and posture. An hour after treatment, lambs then underwent an emotional reactivity test that consisted of three phases: Isolation, Novelty and Startle. Following treatment, Ring lambs displayed more abnormal postures (mean = 2.5 ± 0.5) compared to Sham lambs (mean = 0.05 ± 0.4,

Identifiants

pubmed: 37009150
doi: 10.7717/peerj.15092
pii: 15092
pmc: PMC10064992
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e15092

Informations de copyright

©2023 Marini et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Références

PeerJ. 2015 Dec 14;3:e1510
pubmed: 26713255
Pain. 2022 Jun 1;163(6):e697-e714
pubmed: 34510132
Aust J Biol Sci. 1987;40(1):97-103
pubmed: 2978899
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2011 Mar;38(2):134-45
pubmed: 21303445
Vet J. 2006 Sep;172(2):274-83
pubmed: 16051508
Vet Rec. 1994 Apr 30;134(18):463-7
pubmed: 8059511
Animals (Basel). 2020 Jul 30;10(8):
pubmed: 32751689
Behav Processes. 1999 Nov;48(1-2):101-10
pubmed: 24897566
Res Vet Sci. 1989 May;46(3):387-91
pubmed: 2544971
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 04;8(12):e80556
pubmed: 24324609
Curr Biol. 2014 May 19;24(10):1121-5
pubmed: 24814149
Am J Physiol. 1998 Oct;275(4):E671-8
pubmed: 9755087
Vet J. 2007 Sep;174(2):227-39
pubmed: 17553712
Res Vet Sci. 1992 May;52(3):389-90
pubmed: 1620975
PeerJ. 2020 Oct 6;8:e10081
pubmed: 33083137
Front Neurosci. 2022 May 19;16:887042
pubmed: 35663552
Res Vet Sci. 2020 Dec;133:210-218
pubmed: 33017801
Res Vet Sci. 1993 Sep;55(2):236-45
pubmed: 8235093
N Z Vet J. 1996 Apr;44(2):45-54
pubmed: 16031893
Dev Psychobiol. 2003 Mar;42(2):131-47
pubmed: 12555278
J Anim Sci. 2022 Apr 1;100(4):
pubmed: 35275597
Biol Lett. 2016 Jun;12(6):
pubmed: 27277950
Genet Sel Evol. 2005 Jul-Aug;37(4):381-401
pubmed: 15943918
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2020 Jul;21(7):353-365
pubmed: 32440016
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Jun;125:168-192
pubmed: 33582232
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 Jul;14(7):502-11
pubmed: 23719569
Curr Opin Physiol. 2019 Oct;11:42-50
pubmed: 32322780
Front Behav Neurosci. 2018 Oct 23;12:246
pubmed: 30405371
N Z Vet J. 2000 Apr;48(2):33-43
pubmed: 16032116
Physiol Behav. 2011 Mar 28;102(5):503-10
pubmed: 21236279
Curr Biol. 2020 Aug 3;30(15):R866-R867
pubmed: 32750341
Behav Brain Res. 2004 May 5;151(1-2):25-35
pubmed: 15084418
Vet J. 1998 Jan;155(1):39-51
pubmed: 9455158
Animals (Basel). 2021 Jul 30;11(8):
pubmed: 34438699
Animals (Basel). 2018 Aug 07;8(8):
pubmed: 30087230
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2008 Aug;199(3):421-37
pubmed: 18058089
Aust Vet J. 2000 May;78(5):339-43
pubmed: 10904820
Vet Rec. 2001 Sep 15;149(11):321-4
pubmed: 11583126
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 20;10(1):3007
pubmed: 32080271
Aust Vet J. 2014 Oct;92(10):381-8
pubmed: 25256843
J Endocrinol. 2006 Mar;188(3):443-9
pubmed: 16522725
Behav Processes. 2016 Nov;132:49-56
pubmed: 27693533
Aust Vet J. 2011 Dec;89(12):477-89
pubmed: 22103946
Behav Processes. 2022 Sep;201:104709
pubmed: 35878682

Auteurs

Danila Marini (D)

Agriculture and Food, The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.
Davies Livestock Research Centre, School of Animal and Veterinary Science, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Jessica E Monk (JE)

Agriculture and Food, The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.
School of Environmental and Rural Science, The University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.

Dana L M Campbell (DLM)

Agriculture and Food, The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.

Caroline Lee (C)

Agriculture and Food, The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.

Sue Belson (S)

Agriculture and Food, The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.

Alison Small (A)

Agriculture and Food, The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH