The relationship between parental behavior and the reproductive strategy of daughter is mediated by the development of machiavellianism personality.
Female
Machiavellianism
Parental rejection
Psychosocial acceleration theory
Short-term reproductive strategy
Journal
Heliyon
ISSN: 2405-8440
Titre abrégé: Heliyon
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672560
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2023
Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
09
08
2022
revised:
07
03
2023
accepted:
14
03
2023
medline:
4
4
2023
entrez:
3
4
2023
pubmed:
4
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Females who receive harsh, rejective, and inconsistent nurturing behavior from parents, are predicted to adopt mating strategies, such as short-term and unstable pair bonds with males. The speculation that, the rejective behavior a female receives during the early days, and their short-term mating strategy is mediated by the development of Machiavellianism personality, is not well confirmed. In this study, we investigated the relationship between parenting behavior, experienced by female college students (n = 168) in their early days, Machiavellianism personality, and behavior related to short-term reproductive strategy. The results revealed that, both maternal rejective behavior received by women in their childhood and Machiavellianism, have a relationship with the number of males that the female has ever romantically involved. Moreover, the mediation effect of Machiavellianism between maternal rejection in participants' childhood, and the number of males romantically involved, was marginally significant. This suggests that girls rejected by their mothers developed Machiavellianism. Consequently, this results in unstable female pair-bonding with the males.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37009329
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14672
pii: S2405-8440(23)01879-0
pmc: PMC10060177
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e14672Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Front Evol Neurosci. 2011 Dec 22;3:10
pubmed: 22203802
Horm Behav. 2022 Feb;138:105101
pubmed: 35124424
Child Dev. 2000 Mar-Apr;71(2):485-501
pubmed: 10834479
Dev Psychol. 2010 Jan;46(1):120-8
pubmed: 20053011
Psychol Assess. 2010 Jun;22(2):420-32
pubmed: 20528068
Health Care Women Int. 2017 Jul;38(7):732-752
pubmed: 28557583
Child Dev. 2003 May-Jun;74(3):801-21
pubmed: 12795391
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 22;10:547
pubmed: 31001156
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1980 Apr;61(4):265-74
pubmed: 7446184
Adolescence. 1993 Winter;28(112):913-24
pubmed: 8266844
Psychol Bull. 2004 Nov;130(6):920-58
pubmed: 15535743
Psychol Med. 1998 Nov;28(6):1443-55
pubmed: 9854285
Child Dev. 1991 Aug;62(4):647-70
pubmed: 1935336
Eur J Psychol. 2017 Aug 31;13(3):491-502
pubmed: 28904597
Behav Brain Sci. 2005 Apr;28(2):247-75; discussion 275-311
pubmed: 16201459
Horm Behav. 2013 Jul;64(2):262-9
pubmed: 23998670