Upper limb home-based robotic rehabilitation in chronic stroke patients: A pilot study.
home-based
rehabilitation
robotic device
stroke
technologies
upper limb
Journal
Frontiers in neurorobotics
ISSN: 1662-5218
Titre abrégé: Front Neurorobot
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101477958
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
23
12
2022
accepted:
27
02
2023
medline:
4
4
2023
entrez:
3
4
2023
pubmed:
4
4
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Robotic therapy allow to propose sessions of controlled and identical exercises, customizing settings, and characteristics on the individual patient. The effectiveness of robotic assisted therapy is still under study and the use of robots in clinical practice is still limited. Moreover, the possibility of treatment at home allows to reduce the economic costs and time to be borne by the patient and the caregiver and is a valid tool during periods of pandemic such as covid. The aim of this study is to assess whether a robotic home-based treatment rehabilitation using the iCONE robotic device has effects on a stroke population, despite the chronic condition of patients involved and the absence of a therapist next to the patient while performing the exercises. All patients underwent an initial (T0) and final (T1) assessment with the iCONE robotic device and clinical scales. After T0 evaluation, the robot was delivered to the patient's home for 10 days of at-home treatment (5 days a week for 2 weeks). Comparison between T0 and T1 evaluations revealed some significant improvements in robot-evaluated indices such as Independence and Size for the Circle Drawing exercise and Movement Duration for Point-to-Point exercise, but also in the MAS of the elbow. From the analysis of the acceptability questionnaire, a general appreciation of the robot emerged: patients spontaneously asked for the addition of further sessions and to continue therapy. Telerehabilitation of patients suffering from a chronic stroke is an area that is still little explored. From our experience, this is one of the first studies to carry out a telerehabilitation with these characteristics. The use of robots can become a method to reduce the rehabilitation health costs, to ensure continuity of care, and to arrive in more distant places or where the availability of resources is limited. From the data obtained, this rehabilitation seems to be promising for this population. Moreover, promoting the recovery of the upper limb, iCONE can improve patient's quality of life. It would be interesting to conduct RCT studies to compare a conventional treatment in structure with a robotic telematics treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37009638
doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2023.1130770
pmc: PMC10061073
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1130770Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Bressi, Campagnola, Cricenti, Santacaterina, Miccinilli, Di Pino, Fiori, D'Alonzo, Di Lazzaro, Ricci, Capone, Pacilli, Sterzi and Bravi.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
AP was employed by Heaxel, the company that supplied the robot, and was involved in the management of the robot at home, so she had direct contact with patients. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Prog Brain Res. 1987;71:249-66
pubmed: 3588947
Clin EEG Neurosci. 2015 Oct;46(4):310-20
pubmed: 24756025
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Jan;29(1):104463
pubmed: 31740027
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Jun 19;11:104
pubmed: 24946799
J Physiother. 2014 Mar;60(1):61
pubmed: 24856948
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015 Oct 09;12:89
pubmed: 26452749
Lancet. 2016 Oct 8;388(10053):1459-1544
pubmed: 27733281
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 22;(4):CD001920
pubmed: 24756870
Stroke. 2017 Jul;48(7):2007-2012
pubmed: 28626052
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Jan 09;11:3
pubmed: 24401110
J Rehabil Med. 2017 Jun 28;49(6):449-460
pubmed: 28597018
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:520374
pubmed: 24991557
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Mar;123:11-22
pubmed: 30654899
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Feb 23;18(1):41
pubmed: 33622344
Neurology. 2000 May 23;54(10):1938-44
pubmed: 10822433
JAMA Neurol. 2019 Sep 01;76(9):1079-1087
pubmed: 31233135
Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Sep;41(19):2317-2323
pubmed: 29688080
Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:153872
pubmed: 24350244
Lancet Neurol. 2006 Jul;5(7):603-12
pubmed: 16781990
Semin Neurol. 2018 Apr;38(2):208-211
pubmed: 29791947
Lancet Respir Med. 2017 Sep;5(9):691-706
pubmed: 28822787
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2008 Apr;20(2):103-8
pubmed: 18431076
J Physiother. 2022 Oct;68(4):281
pubmed: 35715375
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 May-Jun;22(3):305-10
pubmed: 18184932
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 31;1:CD010255
pubmed: 32002991
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2022 Sep;29(6):449-463
pubmed: 34281494