Convolutional neural networks on risk stratification of patients with suspected coronary artery disease undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography.
Convolutional neural networks
Coronary artery disease
Coronary computed tomography angiography
Prognosis
Journal
The international journal of cardiovascular imaging
ISSN: 1875-8312
Titre abrégé: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100969716
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Jun 2023
Historique:
received:
27
09
2022
accepted:
26
02
2023
medline:
29
5
2023
pubmed:
4
4
2023
entrez:
3
4
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess the prognostic value of convolutional neural networks (CNN) on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) in comparison to conventional computed tomography (CT) reporting and clinical risk scores. 5468 patients who underwent CCTA with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) were included. Primary endpoint was defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina or late revascularization (> 90 days after CCTA). Early revascularization was additionally included as a training endpoint for the CNN algorithm. Cardiovascular risk stratification was based on Morise score and the extent of CAD (eoCAD) as assessed on CCTA. Semiautomatic post-processing was performed for vessel delineation and annotation of calcified and non-calcified plaque areas. Using a two-step training of a DenseNet-121 CNN the entire network was trained with the training endpoint, followed by training the feature layer with the primary endpoint. During a median follow-up of 7.2 years, the primary endpoint occurred in 334 patients. CNN showed an AUC of 0.631 ± 0.015 for prediction of the combined primary endpoint, while combining it with conventional CT and clinical risk scores showed an improvement of AUC from 0.646 ± 0.014 (based on eoCAD only) to 0.680 ± 0.015 (p < 0.0001) and from 0.619 ± 0.0149 (based on Morise Score only) to 0.6812 ± 0.0145 (p < 0.0001), respectively. In a stepwise model including all prediction methods, it was found an AUC of 0.680 ± 0.0148. CNN analysis showed to improve conventional CCTA-derived and clinical risk stratification when evaluating CCTA of patients with suspected CAD.
Identifiants
pubmed: 37010650
doi: 10.1007/s10554-023-02824-y
pii: 10.1007/s10554-023-02824-y
pmc: PMC10220106
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1209-1216Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Lancet Digit Health. 2022 Apr;4(4):e256-e265
pubmed: 35337643
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2021 Jul-Aug;15(4):333-338
pubmed: 33423941
Radiology. 2020 Apr;295(1):136-145
pubmed: 32013791
CJC Open. 2021 Sep 30;4(2):189-196
pubmed: 35198936
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Dec;10(12):
pubmed: 29233836
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Apr;6(4):448-57
pubmed: 23498679
Radiographics. 2017 Nov-Dec;37(7):2113-2131
pubmed: 29131760
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2022 Dec;44(12):8704-8716
pubmed: 31135351
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jun 30;54(1):49-57
pubmed: 19555840
Eur Heart J. 2019 Jun 21;40(24):1975-1986
pubmed: 30060039
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Oct;13(10):2162-2173
pubmed: 32682719
Eur Radiol. 2018 Jun;28(6):2655-2664
pubmed: 29352380
Open Heart. 2015 May 19;2(1):e000234
pubmed: 26019881
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2019 Jul;38(7):1588-1598
pubmed: 30507498
Med Image Anal. 2017 Dec;42:60-88
pubmed: 28778026
Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 14;41(3):407-477
pubmed: 31504439
Am J Med. 1997 Apr;102(4):350-6
pubmed: 9217616
Nat Med. 2019 Jan;25(1):24-29
pubmed: 30617335
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Feb 07;10:944135
pubmed: 36824452
Eur Heart J. 2017 Feb 14;38(7):500-507
pubmed: 27252451